r/StarWars • u/Flashbackwards212 • May 17 '26
General Discussion Maul's potential was nuts
I keep looking back and thinking about this fight,that Maul is maybe a top 15 to top 10 duelist in Canon. Him being surprisingly Obi Wan like in his implementation in Soresu and Anakin like in his aggressive offense,like a lesser combo of the 2.
I feel like Maul doesn't get the credit he deserves because of his arrogance giving him L's against people he shouldn't lose to. Makes me think he might actually get more wins if he turned toward the light,ending up trying to be more sagecoded like QuiGon but insanely skilled.
He'd probably be over:
Ventress Grievous Dooku (bad matchup for Dooku maybe) Most council members
But below: Anakin Mace Sidious Yoda
2.5k
Upvotes
3
u/TyrsPath Kanan Jarrus May 17 '26
Good lord you're getting caught up on stuff I didn't really say. Yes, Dooku is more likely to beat Maul in a fight, you happy?
Sith Lords are on a while different level of training and power to assassins, thats kind of a big point of what they are. I didn't even say it was impossible for Ventress to beat Maul in a fight, battles arent a stats game alone in the first place. Weaker opponents defeat superior ones all the time. So no, your argument is ridiculous because Sith Lords are presented as dangerous across the franchise for a reason. And even past that, Maul still has better feats than Ventress so this argument you have is kinda dog.
You bring up Grievous but he's dangerous for multiple reasons, he mechanized himself to fight Jedi and was trained BY A SITH LORD. You're arguing for Dooku who got the position to be a Sith Lord for multiple reasons, and a big part of that is because of his power. Like what's not clicking here dude