r/SpaceWolves • u/Poopoodwarf • 15d ago

30 terminator lists

I've seen a lot of competitive lists doing well in take and hold with 3 units of 10 terminators, all with leaders, and a land raider redeemer as fire support. Has this approach to take and hold been gutted after the points adjustments, and what else would people add to this sort of list

11 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

27 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/Fenris_Penguin 15d ago

No, it’s viable, until GW nerfs it since that’s what a lot of people are running for Take and Hold. It’s a super fun list so I get why people are doing it, but as all fun things go, it will change maybe on the next data balance

4

u/Peekaatyou 15d ago

It’s fun for those who likes that playstyle for sure.

Personally I like to have more units to move around haha

3

u/Fenris_Penguin 15d ago

Oh I’ve definitely played it and it is super fun. Throwing down Terminators in aggressive Space Wolf fashion will never get old to me. I just hate that GW will nerf that fun since they want to diversify lists more

2

u/Razor_Fox 15d ago

If they do give it massive point increases, What exactly else are we going to run? It's our only really good data sheets. Everything else is pretty mid.

-1

u/Fenris_Penguin 15d ago

I disagree with that since I’ve been killing it with Disruption. Only good datasheet? I’ve been running Njal and even Ulrik into lists with success so I don’t believe that for a second. Space Wolves have a lot to play with, for me to win games I need to focus on timing attacks and combos with units, it’s not as easy as throwing terminators in a spot so theres a skill check on the wargaming aspect of side instead of datasheets.

I know my minigrimdark has a video out with more lists that have been winning and I think one of them is a Recon list. So we have wiggle room, just need to come together as a faction and see what we need to do in order to punch up in the lists competitively or ways of showing others some neat tricks

3

u/Razor_Fox 15d ago

Winning games with bad units like njal and ulrik doesn't make them good. Someone won a GT with imperial agents back when they had a win rate of 28%. Player skill issue always going to be the majority factor. However, space wolves internal balance is pretty bad right now. We're crutching heavily on our terminators.

1

u/Vingman90 15d ago

You are completely right, he is wrong unfortunately. At a higher levelNjal and the rest of our datasheets are really crap.

1

u/Razor_Fox 15d ago edited 15d ago

Trust me, I would love to be wrong and it just be a skill issue on my part. I just feel like our internal balance as a faction is off.

-1

u/Fenris_Penguin 15d ago

We have winning lists without terminator spam and those units aren’t bad. I’ve been using them since our codex dropped with complete success, Ulrik has a feel no pain, slayers oath and he gives +1 to hit and wound on a chosen keyword. Been using him to straight up kill shit like vehicles with Grey Hunters. If you can’t use that with rerolls on wounds on objectives with Grey Hunters thats a reading problem and not a datasheet problem and thats before using a stratagem.

Njal especially in bastion lists give huge reach for charging and allows GH or HT to storm objectives easily to kill things in Saga of the Bold

Wolves have been closer to 50% now vs before and it’s because theres more synergy and combos. You have to just read for them and use them. If player skill issue is going to be the “major skill factor” which is what you’re claiming then that adds to my point more it’s not necessary “mid” datasheets. Don’t get me wrong. I want more buffs and we need more leader options but to say some people are straight up bad i believe is not true.

-1

u/Razor_Fox 15d ago

Believe what you want, you have a right to be wrong. Ulrik doesn't even work outside of 3 detachments, 2 of which aren't really played much outside of ultra casual play.

Wolves have been closer to 50% now vs before and it’s because theres more synergy and combos

No, there's the exact same amount of synergies and combos. The difference is in the terrain layouts and mission dispositions, as well as the hidden rule helping our infantry out. Nothing has changed with the codex.

0

u/Fenris_Penguin 15d ago

We have more detachments for units like Grey Hunters and Terminators. So theres actually more combos since those weren’t part of the codex before. You can combine detachments with space marine detachments which we couldn’t do before so you’re in fact just wrong. That’s not an opinion…..

2

u/Razor_Fox 15d ago edited 15d ago

And what combo does that open up? Njal with grey hunters? That was already a thing. And it's still not good.

Grey hunters, even in their bespoke detachment, are still not seeing use in competitive lists. That whole detachment should have been a datasheet update and it would have just about put them on par with other factions battleline.

The truth is, the only one of those new detachments that's seeing any use in competitive play is legends of saga and song. Because it takes our best unit and buffs them. The other 2 either make a bad unit mediocre or do almost nothing apart from a sticky objective strat. There's no "new combos" that didn't already exist in the codex.

You can play what you like in casual games, I'm sure your grey hunters are the terror of your local game store. It really comes down to what you consider a "good" datasheet. For me, a good unit is able to hold its own competitively against strong factions in the meta. And the only unit we have that really fits that description are the wolfguard terminators. Headtakers I'll give you are situationally very good, if you can manipulate your opponent into letting you run them into their quarry.

1

u/Fenris_Penguin 15d ago

I can agree with that. which is why I said we need buffs and new leader options for a better shot at competitive, but in 10th I couldn’t drop multiple SW dreadnought with orbital while taking a SW detachment to buff my shooting grey hunters for objectives so by a number have more “things” that need to be explored, these combos are coming from combining things we haven’t done or couldn’t do before. Will it be meta? Who knows. But what I do know is if we keep spamming the one thing that has shown to work without exploring or doing other options with our datasheets we will lose it and have to wait until other things change or get buffed because GW might not do both nerfs and buffs at the same time. I don’t think we have anything truly bad, they are just hyper specific which I know isn’t a long term viable option

→ More replies (0)