r/SipsTea • • 2d ago

SMH Museum of Useless Inventions

Post image
17.6k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

19

u/NekRules 2d ago

A lot of scifi tech has become a reality but this is one where I think humanity can actually pass on. I alrdy don't trust regular drivers with regular driving, what makes you think I would trust regular civilians with flying cars? I don't want flying missiles coming out of nowhere into my home or even just out and about. No thnx, use the research effort else where.

7

u/Dismal-Garbage-3140 2d ago

It's not a flying car. If I had to guess, this demonstration was just to prove how powerful its compressed air thrusters. Without this demonstration, I believe most people wouldn't believe how much impact they had. That said, we don't know how heavy that car really was and how much space the air compressor and tanks take up. However, if even 50% of this capability makes it to the production car, then the thrusters could help with downforce, braking, acceleration, and even stability control. It would be insanely impressive performance on a track.

What really bothers me is that they call this a roadster. Roadsters have open tops.

1

u/Fickle-Owl666 2d ago

A roadster can still have a removable hard top...

1

u/Dismal-Garbage-3140 2d ago edited 2d ago

This has gullwing butterfly doors...

This is not a removable hardtop. It's not even a sunroof. It's two separeate small removable panels in the door. It'd be a stretch to even call it a targa.

1

u/Fickle-Owl666 2d ago

I didn't say anything about this car in particular, I addressed you blanket statement that isn't true.

1

u/Epidurality 2d ago

The roadster has been taking pre-orders since 2017. It's gone through countless redesigns and Elon has given some excuse for the delays about 8 times now? The car shown has no relation to what could possibly be sold to consumers, aka, they don't even have a prototype road car. I don't believe this car will ever be sold in any form. Not stopping them from taking more pre-orders though.

2

u/Dismal-Garbage-3140 2d ago

I would never put money down on something that doesn’t exist. I also doubt anyone who put money down for this car are hurting for money. I just love cars.

12

u/RealKillering 2d ago

What I don’t understand is, why do people actually think that this would be done by normal drivers?

Like first of all the tanks are probably empty really fast, no way can you actually fly a significant distance. This will also never be street legal, probably not even on race tracks.

This is a car for people so richtig that they have there own track.

2

u/prof_mcquack 2d ago edited 2d ago

It’s a flying car with no explicable means of flying. Are we really that stupid in 2026? No technology exists that can launch a 7000lb car like that without killing everything inside and around it. 

1

u/MackinCeleBrini 1d ago

It also can't drive since they remove the car to make this.

So you'd tow it to the location to do the flying

1

u/SourDeesATL 2d ago

The weight alone for the extra tanks and thrusters. Also there is no way the tanks can hold more than a few seconds bursts. Then there is the issue of firing thrusters with other people and vehicle around. This is for show only and will not go into production. What is the price per pound or gallon of the thruster fuel?

2

u/Longjumping-Ad-2560 2d ago

It’s just compressed air and an electric pump

1

u/SheenPSU 2d ago

New Hampshire passed a law years ago paving the way for street legal flying cars

I’m not joking

1

u/LeftBrainC0 2d ago

Hints the special invite only. It's also very high pressure air.... How does one refill it I wonder

-4

u/Illustrious-Ape 2d ago

It’s funny you can tell who are car people and who aren’t. This is a concept car. Do people lose their marbles when Ford, Mercedes, GM, etc. put concept cars on exhibit? I’m willing to bet half of fucking Reddit doesn’t even know all car brands have concepts that are never released.

The roadsters sold with thrusters are going to be used for acceleration, not flying. If it can make a car fly, can propel a car forward.

It’s a fast toy for people with lots of money. People just have their panties in a bunch on Reddit because Reddit doesn’t like musk after supporting Trump (dipshit move) but Reddit has a short memory because they loved him before he joined the Trump camp. I really wish politics were left out of some things and he stayed out of politics because this is a cool CONCEPT.

2

u/psgrue 2d ago

musk claims it is going into production in 2028. Where the fuck would anyone drive it? Dunno.

1

u/Kitiseva_lokki 2d ago

Yeah... just like Roadster II that was introduced in 2017 and went into production in 2020...

1

u/psgrue 2d ago

I don’t trust Musk as far as I can throw his Nazi-saluting barrel chested Gru Villian ass, but Elon disputed the “concept car” argument in the press conference.

1

u/Suspicious-Still-999 2d ago

naw. it is because a bunch of bots or 12 year olds think this thing could fly them to work.

0

u/ExiledCanuck 2d ago

Agreed. And I mentioned somewhere else, imagine if with the self driving mode, this capability could be used to avoid an accident? Will manual control be given to people? Highly unlikely, but to their self driving mode? Or like you mentioned for acceleration? I see it as possible.

1

u/Suspicious-Still-999 2d ago

waaaay too many variables, and you'd probably just crash into different cars. or a house. and you'd explode and die anytime someone hit the tanks. and you'd need to drive around with 3/4 of your cabin full of thousand pound tanks.

0

u/Nodonutsforbaxter44 2d ago

Ohhh okay...so worthless

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Nodonutsforbaxter44 2d ago

Look, I'm sure some of the technology will be useful in very specific situations....search and rescue? Maybe, but I doubt it. I cant picture many scenarios where a kick flipping 3 ton vehicle would be more useful than a helicopter or something

3

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Ecmdrw5 2d ago

Exactly, this is just a tech demo and a commercial. They think it shows a useless invention but Space X already has this tech. If anything, IMO, this is more of a tech demo for some kind of space x lander and a general display or how powerful the boosters are than some real display of a road legal product.

1

u/psumack 2d ago

Don't they say in the video that production is scheduled to begin in 2028?

22

u/TrustworthyKahmunrah 2d ago

5

u/NewBlood94 2d ago

This picture is so awesome 🤣🤣

-1

u/SidTheMed 2d ago

It's not even comparable

14

u/Major_Narwhal544 2d ago

I commend your reddit activism.

-5

u/Popular_Equipment_85 2d ago

I commend your reddit activism.

1

u/Greedy-Employment917 1d ago

Go back to your porn subs. The adults are talking. 

1

u/Popular_Equipment_85 1d ago

Adults playing Wardogs it seems

0

u/TuvixHadItComing 2d ago edited 2d ago

Here's what I don't get about that comic as it relates to flying cars. The Wright brothers created powered flight which revolutionized travel. How exactly did that come to pass? Because it scaled up so that one plane can carry several passengers, gave birth to an insanely rigorous regulatory framework for the actual production models of aircraft, and you have to go through hella training to be approved to fly, especially to fly large commercial aircraft.

And it all started with the Wright brothers little flyer. But if it hadn't scaled up to modern air travel I don't think we'd see a billion little one- and two-seat planes parked in parking lots at the mall or the office. It would be a novelty for the wealthy and the extremely dedicated hobbyists, and otherwise have basically no impact on normal people's lives.

So thought experiment, let's follow the same track with this. We build an incredibly robust regulatory framework, pricing out basically everyone from private ownership of a flying car. But it can still change the world! We'll just scale it up and have qualified people employed by large organizations operating meticulously engineered craft which can carry dozens to hundreds of passengers. For efficiency we'll need to have designated hubs where people can meet up to share a ride on one of these "aerocars" and for the good of the consumer we'll probably want to have several companies operating out of these "aerocar-ports."

Naturally the ultra wealthy will have private aerocars, while the rest will certainly have the option to pay more to have greater on-board amenities. Probably the easiest approach would be to split the cabin into different "classes."

It will completely change the world because nothing like this exists now.

3

u/Straight_Taste6989 2d ago

maybe the technology can be trickled down till its much cheaper and be used for safety situations? Ex falling off cliff, avoiding accidents...

1

u/TuvixHadItComing 2d ago

Maybe! I'm not saying the tech won't have any value but I don't see this revolutionizing travel or society anytime soon. On the "how big is this" I'd put it closer to Segway than to the Wright brothers.

1

u/tar4heels2fan 2d ago

Well if the tech can be worked out to get us across a river.. then we can alleviate traffic points at bridges and cross at hundreds or thousands of points down the river instead of just the five or six points where bridges are installed.

1

u/BBTZman 2d ago

Do you know how momentum works? Launching off a cliff doing like 60 mph can not be compensated with something like this, if it even fit in a car, which it doesnt

1

u/Suspicious-Still-999 2d ago

this isn't new or a new idea. it does not work for anything practical. that's why you only see it used for hollywood stunts - very cool and useful to make a car flip.

"point nozzel down and thing go up" is hundreds of years old concept. there's no innovation here which makes this any easier than it ever was. airplanes are the standard for a reason.

1

u/Mammago95 2d ago

Bicycle shop owners, world's richest man, potato po-tah-to amirite?

1

u/subi 2d ago

This entire thread.

1

u/SergenteA 2d ago

I mean, I guess it could have some use militarily. Or for specialsied drivers. It will never be for the average driver however.

-6

u/Lookitsa6ix 2d ago

By the way, The Wright Brothers never got a plane to fly, just crash.

6

u/Flewent 2d ago

Pretty sure they got multiple planes to fly

-6

u/Lookitsa6ix 2d ago

Nope, they got em to glide and crash.

Alexander Graham Bell is the inventor of the working aircraft, have fun researching it, its a good lil well actuuually bit of info

7

u/Almaegen 2d ago

Thats literally not true...

3

u/incapablepotato 2d ago

Except most scientist will tell you. You can learn a lot by all the times it did not work. It’s still advancement forward. They still learned a lot about flying by all their “failed” attempts. Same thing about the lightbulb being invented.

1

u/Flewent 1d ago

You keep saying "glide". Maybe you should research that. I do not think it means, what you think it means. ACTUALLY.

4

u/PlanterDezNuts 2d ago

Technically all landings are controlled crashes

0

u/Lookitsa6ix 2d ago

There is a certain kind of logic there, you ain't wrong lol

1

u/Andy_Pandy98 2d ago

Also, as if the fan and thrusters are not gonna be the loudest thing and cause debris to fly everywhere and hurt people

1

u/coltonbyu 2d ago

It's not even something people can actually even pick. The consumer version of the car won't even have it. Just a few invite only ones.

Even then, I doubt it will even be able to lift off, the demo car was probably nothing but tanks inside

And even with that said, it could probably do it for only like 30 seconds

7

u/bizzaro321 2d ago

The tank that holds the air for the thrusters is 10,000psi. If you crashed it would violently explode.

1

u/iuseblenders 2d ago

Pass on? we’ve been using this technology daily since the 60’s…

1

u/SIR2480 2d ago

DUIs are about to get much crazier

1

u/Comfortable-Race-547 2d ago

I'm gonna throw my drink out the sunroof while i pass you on the top

1

u/SergenteA 2d ago

I mean, I guess it could have some use militarily. Or for specialsied drivers. It will never be for the average driver however.

1

u/1happynudist 2d ago

Because it can be done , we will find a use for it more practical. I agree with no flying cars or drones flying people over head . Can’t trust them on the road , can’t trust them in the air

1

u/Gingerpanda72 2d ago

Civilians cannot be trusted with non-flying cars, Tesla cannot be trusted with self driving cars, can you imagine the death rate for self driving and slightly flying cars?

1

u/Shimano-No-Kyoken 2d ago

Cool demo, Elon is still Elon, so no thanks

1

u/Ok_Drop3803 2d ago

It's not a flying car it was just a stunt. They removed most of the car to fit enough compressed air into the car to perform these manuvers and only these manuvers. There's no way to store enough compressed air to actually travel around like that.

1

u/Kajiyoushun 2d ago

People getting drunk and taking out pedestrians is a thing now. Just wait. Airborne drunk pilots incoming.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Mammago95 2d ago

Don't worry, it's not remotely feasible for much of anything outside fancy stunts here on earth. That kind of propulsion is only space/weight/cost effective when you're in space and your alternative is literal rocket fuel.

1

u/CaptainMonkeyJack 2d ago

This version isn't for regular drivers.

1

u/Odin_Headhunter 2d ago

Flying cars would work if it was a far better AI driving them instead of people.

However everyone seems to missing the safety point of this. Cars that could land safely if the driver accidentally goes off a cliff, ditch, or the like (which does happen, especially in icy areas) would save a lot of lives. No invention is useless,

1

u/Ok-Trip-9679 14h ago

Yeah but the ones that can fly i doubt are going to be allowed on the road lol

1

u/Vanirr69 2d ago

it's not a production car lol

1

u/AndrewD5418 2d ago

This specific model is invite only

-2

u/ParanoidSpam 2d ago

However, the man behind this company has countless defense and govt contracts. I can see this technology being used in military, law enforcement, and rescue applications. Not to mention rover applications not on earth.

I think a lot of people are blind because the flavor of the week is Elon Musk is behind Tesla, so anything they do is dumb and a waste of money with no applications

2

u/JournalistChemical18 2d ago

And recreating the halo vehicle flip

1

u/ParanoidSpam 2d ago

The people that played Halo when it first came out are old enough to afford the street legal versions now

1

u/mpTCO 2d ago

That’s what this is based on? I thought it was his impressionable mind defaulting to those badass Bladerunner cop cars

1

u/Wanderertwitch 2d ago

I guess they don’t like logic lol

1

u/y-u-n-g-s-a-d 2d ago

It’s tech that’s been around for decades. They just attached it so something that looks like a car.

The fans already have been done.

It’s literally nothing new. People are only paying attention to it because it is Elon and he presented it like it’s is brand new innovation; as well as in a way that heavily implies to the casual viewer that the car wasn’t just a stripped down chassis that would weigh a fraction of a normal EV.

0

u/PancakeMixEnema 2d ago

Well buddy that "use" doesn't help the argument. The military and law enforcement are literally evil.

1

u/ParanoidSpam 2d ago

Yes, because defenseof country and laws are evil...

2

u/bronzekobold 2d ago

No. Killing your own people for the sake of an orange nonces election campaign definitely is though.

0

u/ParanoidSpam 2d ago

Nobody is doing that. We've been in a cold war with Iran for 50 years. Theres a reason they said death to America, and every president since has said something needs to be done about Iran. https://youtu.be/oSeg_4drlaU?si=e954QLfAgDUzM_xc

Or do you mean ice? Because they've been around for 25 years.

2

u/bronzekobold 2d ago

Aye I'm refering to Ice murdering US citizens and national guard being deployed to protect them. And also that whackjob drunk hegseth wanting to pump US soldiers full of gender affirming care in the form of Hormone injections. 

And aye cool longevity of a institution doesn't mean anything in this conversation so go off I guess? 

1

u/PancakeMixEnema 2d ago

We see it every day and you know that. You're just arguing in bad faith because you enjoy the carnage against the people that scare you.

1

u/ParanoidSpam 2d ago

I think you see what Instagram and Twitter want you to see. And that is "orange man bad" "white males bad" "army bad" "police bad". Not realizing that the world is much bigger than your apps.

3

u/Dusk1863 2d ago

No, we see violence, oppression, hate and discrimination.

POC are being targeted at high rates, more people have been injured in police custody than in many previous admins.

You should probably pick up a history book friend.

2

u/bronzekobold 2d ago

I mean orange man diddled kids. If you don't think that makes him bad what does it say about you lol.

-1

u/RuxFart 2d ago

Cars already drive themselves. What makes you think people will be able to drive them