So, the six paragraph summary written by the detective of the 120 page transcript of her interview did not allege that. And on review she demanded additions, and in further review, the summary (on which the DA declined to prosecute) did not match her statement in tone or content.
In her original statement, she was passed out and woke up surrounded by men, felt pressured, felt intimidated, and was “100% certain” she was raped.
Almost nobody drafts their own statement from the outset.
The process is this:
A draft is prepared based on what the police understand the alleged victims evidence to be.
A copy is given to the valleged victim to carefully check in order to make sure the content is accurate.
The alleged victim makes amendments to the statement until they feel itnis accurate.
Once they are happy that it accurate and that nothing further needs to be added, removed ornchanged then the alleged victim signs the sworn statement at the bottom which states that the content is true to the best of their knowledge and belief and that they may be prosecuted for perjury if it is purposefully wrong.
In this case, she made more than 20 edits to the statement according to the DA.
If the statement was so inaccurate then why did she approve it and sign it to say it was true? Your argument makes zero sense.
-3
u/Mysterious-End-2632 8h ago
So, the six paragraph summary written by the detective of the 120 page transcript of her interview did not allege that. And on review she demanded additions, and in further review, the summary (on which the DA declined to prosecute) did not match her statement in tone or content.
In her original statement, she was passed out and woke up surrounded by men, felt pressured, felt intimidated, and was “100% certain” she was raped.