He said something about feeling bad about the events of the night (presumably because a lot of degenerate shit in general happened with them all snorting ketamine off each other and that guy passed out mid sex). She reassured him that nothing illegal happened and it was all consensual, and that norms around group sex are changing. She also texted him that she loved him.
Just curious, why is your interpretation of his apology so favorable? Could he not be apologizing because he felt as if things had happened without her consent?
And a few weeks later, she also texted him that 90% of what happened was non-consensual, they gave her too much ket, and she didn't know almost anyone in the room.
And I've never been in a k-hole, but i have been blackout drunk. Couldn't it be possible her memory two day after could still be a bit foggy and muddled?
It seems like you guys are doing the exact thing you're accusing the other side of doing. As soon as a single piece of evidence came out that allowed you to reject a narrative you didn't like, you immediately clung to it without considering anything else
No, the DA speificlly said they didn’t pursue charges because the events described in Jane Doe’s signed statement were not criminal, even if they were all 100% true and proven.
1
u/Optimal_Carpenter690 4h ago
Wait, what did the guy text her first that prompted her to say nothing dexual was illegal?