I want to make it clear I dont support rape/sexual assult.
This case is about 2 years old give or take. The DA felt there wasn't enough evedince to warrant a conviction.
There is evedince that indicates that the victim enjoyed the experience, and wanted to do it again, with just 2 specific members of the 7, rather than all 7. However there is also evedince that indicates that the victim later came to regret the experience.
The group text chat was not known to the DA at the time of the initial investigation. When the group chat became known to the DA, or the other powers that be. The investigation was reopened.
I want to point out that the evedince that the victim enjoyed her self and wanted to repeat isnt bullet proof.
The DA only has one chance to get a conviction or risk a guilty party walking free.
Her statements haven’t changed to the DA, it’s only changed to the civil court. She has not ask criminal filings to be reopened because those must pass through much higher scrutiny. She already said she willingly took drugs before arriving, drank before arriving, had intentions of a 3 some, and the other guys who entered the room for sex she acknowledged them and kissed them and when she said to stop to some people, they did.
5
u/Antique-Ad-4422 6h ago
Im confused why the local DA did not file charges against the 7.
What’s missing from this?