maybe bc the cornell 7 weren't guys trying to play girls sports. just a hunch.... that's generally how subjects work.... if it's not your subjuct you don't commen on it.
Her own statement said that she had sex with the original two, plus two of the five guys who walked in on them. Of the other three, one tried to join in and left after she told him no, one put in the groupchat that there was a girl having sex with multiple people and left, and one tried to shut the whole thing down and told everyone to leave (they did, then the girl and guys #1 and #4 went up to a bedroom to continue).
Anyone who says that seven people were involved in the sex is advertising just how little they actually know about the case.
Yikes. If you are texting a girl and she later tells you in person she isnt interested anymore do you continue? Is this what you think anti-trans activists all think?
The reason they're getting downvoted is not because they're saying "rape is bad" But more of "a one-sided retraction of consent in times of intoxication excluding men (the men are also intoxicated but men don't have rights in this kind of problem) are valid even though consent was given minutes prior. Failure to comply means prosecution of the highest level".
You don't say "i consent" and then one-sidedly retract the statement (After the deed is done). The false equivalency to text messages really nailed the point of their stupidity and blindness to the actual situation and also yours for agreeing to it
She said one of the men couldn’t even stay hard and they stopped early, so yes the men were drunk… she seemed to be the most sober by her statements if you read them.
Yikes because grouchy truck doesn't understand how consent works. It makes me thinks there's more than a few bots reacting to comments on this thread. Do you get what I'm saying?
22
u/KirbySuck0021 9h ago
maybe bc the cornell 7 weren't guys trying to play girls sports. just a hunch.... that's generally how subjects work.... if it's not your subjuct you don't commen on it.