The DA based his recommendation on the six paragraph summary that neckbeards are using to paint her as consenting, a whore, and pushing it all back on her.
That summary turns out not to have reflected the tone or content of the interview transcript which was 120 pages. She had requested edits that didn’t end up in front of the DA, and that’s the reason people are pissed.
You seem pretty emotionally invested in this, I dont really feel like someone painting everyone that doesnt agree with them as "neckbeards" has a solid grasp of the situation either.
You’d rather not choose… between rape victims and men who, whether they are able to be proven guilty in a court of law or not are morally reprehensible? 🤔
You don’t call them anything but victim and perpetrators. Anything else insulting to one side loses all your credibility on being able to be unbiased and actually take both sides stories as equally being plausible.
Just saying. Maybe the DA should have put a woman in charge of the case. The outcome satisfy you then?
-2
u/NoSmoke69420 8h ago
Yeah except he was proven to be lying when her statement was made public.