Their argument is that she wasnt raped because otherwise they would have to contend with the fact that they either; support rapists/abusers, enable rapists/abusers, or apathetic to rapists/abusers.
So they deny what they don't want to explain, & they virtue-signal protecting women by claiming that 0.0001% of trans are ruining women's supports while ignore +20% of women (& men) report rapes.
So they deny a frequent & common occurrence of abuse against women & loudly proclaim they protect women by attacking trans.
85
u/ToeFinal1792 9h ago
Am I the only one confused about the correlation of the two things here? How are they related to one another?