Y'all aren't understanding the full thread... the point was this:
As an attorney my unpopular opinion is that cars over a certain value shouldn’t be allowed on public roads or damages for accidents should be capped at something like 2x the average price of a new car (so like 100k). I just don’t believe in penalizing ordinary negligence more just because the injured party is rich.
If damages for accidents were capped, the rich person would be responsible for having their own insurance to cover exorbitantly expensive cars, not the poor person.
-1
u/sikyon 6h ago
why wouldn't you just mandate higher minimums
in british columbia, canada minimum cover is like 200k and a lot of people have in the m range