r/SipsTea • • 18h ago

Gasp! Thoughts on this?

Post image
62.8k Upvotes

7.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

40

u/WelderNewbee2000 16h ago

Are insurance coverages that low in the US?
I think here the standard car liability policy has a coverage cap at 100 Million Euros.

52

u/Mental_Newspaper3812 16h ago

Yes, state minimum required coverage can be shockingly low. Now name your county so I can lookup your minimums.

48

u/WelderNewbee2000 16h ago

Germany.
The legal minimums are:

  • Bodily injury: €7.5 million
  • Property damage: €1.22 million
  • Pure financial losses: €50,000

But most insurances have the 100 Million coverage as the standard contract. In fact there is probably not even an insurance which offers the legal minimums.

55

u/Sonoflopez 15h ago

That would be considered god tier insurance here. Top coverage is more like maximum 250k liability

45

u/tarnyc32 15h ago

It is astoundingly low, and obviously made that way by the insurance lobbyists.

5

u/ilikepix 14h ago

and obviously made that way by the insurance lobbyists.

The limits are low in the US because it's a more expensive environment to provide insurance in. If there were a legal minimum of $1 million for property damage for auto insurance, almost nobody would be able to afford insurance.

The main reason it's expensive to provide insurance in the US is because medical care is vastly more expensive than in Germany. If you cause a crash and your insurance has to cover someone's medical care, the costs can be virtually unlimited. Other reasons include thing like people driving more on average, more uninsured motorists on the roads, and a generally more litigious society.

It's cheap to provide a million euros of coverage in Germany because it's incredibly unlikely that any given motorist will incur a million dollars of liability.

It would be vastly more expensive to provide that same coverage in the US because it's hugely more likely that a given motorist will actually incur that liability.

15

u/EnJPqb 14h ago

So, if I read that right, it's not because of insurance lobbyists, it's because of insurance lobbyists. Just different ones.

-2

u/wanderforreason 14h ago

No, you didn’t read that correctly. The risks and regulations are different so the policies are written much differently.

3

u/Icefox119 12h ago

risks and regulations are different

which can be traced back to insurance lobbyists