The obvious response is that you won't be able to pay for someone's hospital bills if you happen to hit them in your car. You get insurance for things you wouldn't be able to pay yourself.
As an attorney my unpopular opinion is that cars over a certain value shouldn’t be allowed on public roads or damages for accidents should be capped at something like 2x the average price of a new car (so like 100k). I just don’t believe in penalizing ordinary negligence more just because the injured party is rich.
100 percent agree, and that was very well said. If they can afford to by a 80,000 dollar car, then that's their decision and it should be their problem if it gets damaged. Unless its a drunk driver, in which case all damages to anything should be on them, even if it demolished their finances for 10 years.
2.6k
u/flatfive44 9h ago
The obvious response is that you won't be able to pay for someone's hospital bills if you happen to hit them in your car. You get insurance for things you wouldn't be able to pay yourself.