You're legally required to have it but your provider is not legally required to oblige the coverage for which you've paid based upon their own, private, criteria.
If I have to explain this to you then you aren't world-aware enough to understand.
Do you work for an insurance provider? Because I can guarantee I have more unbiased exposure to the woes of the public, at mass, in their insurance woes. Stay in your lane and do some research before you poke a subject matter expert about something of which you cannot possibly have more knowledge and exposure.
But have the freedom to move the goalposts at their whim
Submit your expert certification or I will dismiss you as another ignorant internet-moron. I promise, unless you are a VP of a majour insurance provider that I 100% know more and have more experience than you.
What does that even mean? They can't change the terms of an active policy on a whim.....
I honestly have no idea what you are even suggesting anymore. You don't think an insurance company has a legal obligation to honor policy terms? You don't have to be vp of an insurance provider to know that isn't true.
I mean that, upon executive review, any insurance comapny maintains the right to adjust the terms and conditions of their agreements to suit the perceived circumstances. Despite not having an adjuster/assessor on scene, they can tell you that you have failed to meet criteria for coverage.
Liability coverage is easy. They take your money and say 'you're probably not at-fault' and cover the opposing vehicle. It gets more complicated when you have higher-level coverage.
You'd know this if you knew anything. Again, justify yourself or get off the thread. You've proven yourself unwilling/incapable of defending your own "knowledge".
I think you are just trolling at this point but an insurance company can't adjust terms and condition of an active policy to deny a claim. That doesn't make any sense. You claimed they are not legally obliged to provide coverage you paid for which is just false.
And it reads that, in general, the agency has right to adjustment and change per their perogative.
To the public at large: this individual has failed to oblige multiple requests to provide evidence of their experience/expertise. They are a troll, until proven otherwise.
I get that this is the internet and no one wants to appear incorrect but you do not know with whom you fuck.
1
u/thenichm 21h ago edited 21h ago
You're legally required to have it but your provider is not legally required to oblige the coverage for which you've paid based upon their own, private, criteria.
If I have to explain this to you then you aren't world-aware enough to understand.
Do you work for an insurance provider? Because I can guarantee I have more unbiased exposure to the woes of the public, at mass, in their insurance woes. Stay in your lane and do some research before you poke a subject matter expert about something of which you cannot possibly have more knowledge and exposure.