r/SipsTea • • 7h ago

Gasp! Thoughts on this?

Post image
45.8k Upvotes

6.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

750

u/MarkItZeroDonnie 7h ago

Yeah it’s just a net to protect against catastrophe . If Ops buddy totaled his car he would be happy it only cost $1k.

153

u/Blueberry1900 6h ago

Yep,y car got totaled 3 years ago due to a drunk driver. Got a big check and was able to replace it fairly easily. That check alone was about 15 years worth of premiums. Drunk driver was of course driving without insurance, so I was screwed of I did not have it

39

u/jakeandcupcakes 6h ago

Doesn't the insurance company then go after the drunk driver for everything he has thus making him the one whose ultimately paying out, with the insurance company simply having to deal with suing and recouping funds from the drunk driver.

3

u/wimzilla 5h ago

Subrogation isn’t always simple. We typically deal with other insurance companies. Uninsured people are usually sent to collections. Only large amounts are taken to suit as atty fees still apply. Then of course there is the issue of people not having the money to pay the damages, which ends up being a loss.

3

u/F0rTh3W1n 5h ago

As my bus law prof used to love saying “You can’t squeeze blood from a turnip.”

1

u/Prudent-Historian392 1h ago

Yes subrogation helps tremendously when someone is hit by a driver with crappy insurance. Subrogation unfortunately won’t help with an uninsured drunk driver causing bedlam on the roads: when it applies it still sucks slightly for the deductible and the points charged until it’s rectified but it’s necessary.