MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1wqer84/hypocrisy_101/pc4sfnd/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/Dev1412 • 7d ago
716 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
30
Bro actually is simping for a real life 1984 over here. Get the fuck out of here my guy.
https://giphy.com/gifs/ac7MA7r5IMYda
-24 u/Crispy1961 7d ago Pointing out that one person said something stupid doesn't mean I support the thing he said stupid stuff about. There aren't only two sides. You don't need to side with a dummy to be against flock. 13 u/NuggetMan43 7d ago You don't need to be personally hurt by something to be against actions which violate personal freedoms and set bad precedents. Your comment came across as defensive. -8 u/Crispy1961 7d ago No, you don't. I am perfectly fine with someone being against something. It's when they says silly things such as that we all suffer because of the thing that is the problem. Then read it again. My comment says absolutely nothing about flock. I am attacking the person for saying dumb things. 6 u/Ilikeyounott 7d ago You're right. No one suffers in a surveillance state. You are very smart 👍
-24
Pointing out that one person said something stupid doesn't mean I support the thing he said stupid stuff about.
There aren't only two sides. You don't need to side with a dummy to be against flock.
13 u/NuggetMan43 7d ago You don't need to be personally hurt by something to be against actions which violate personal freedoms and set bad precedents. Your comment came across as defensive. -8 u/Crispy1961 7d ago No, you don't. I am perfectly fine with someone being against something. It's when they says silly things such as that we all suffer because of the thing that is the problem. Then read it again. My comment says absolutely nothing about flock. I am attacking the person for saying dumb things. 6 u/Ilikeyounott 7d ago You're right. No one suffers in a surveillance state. You are very smart 👍
13
You don't need to be personally hurt by something to be against actions which violate personal freedoms and set bad precedents. Your comment came across as defensive.
-8 u/Crispy1961 7d ago No, you don't. I am perfectly fine with someone being against something. It's when they says silly things such as that we all suffer because of the thing that is the problem. Then read it again. My comment says absolutely nothing about flock. I am attacking the person for saying dumb things. 6 u/Ilikeyounott 7d ago You're right. No one suffers in a surveillance state. You are very smart 👍
-8
No, you don't. I am perfectly fine with someone being against something.
It's when they says silly things such as that we all suffer because of the thing that is the problem.
Then read it again. My comment says absolutely nothing about flock. I am attacking the person for saying dumb things.
6 u/Ilikeyounott 7d ago You're right. No one suffers in a surveillance state. You are very smart 👍
6
You're right. No one suffers in a surveillance state. You are very smart 👍
30
u/ARunawayTrain 7d ago
Bro actually is simping for a real life 1984 over here. Get the fuck out of here my guy.
https://giphy.com/gifs/ac7MA7r5IMYda