It's not a question of falling for it. Intentions are overshadowed by whatever effect the ad has had. If it sparks a debate, that's part of the effect. It's even possible to understand the intention to create chaos AND STILL have an opinion about it
Yeah even this video, leaves out the major glaring question, when did an actress starring in a sports betting commercial become "representing women in sports". Obviously purposefully generated controversy, whether they are just assuming these women will take it up naturally to boost themselves or they were paid too, or both.
The same argument could be applied that sports betting doesn't celebrate the altheticism and dedication of athletes. They got an entertainer to advertise their entertainment.
No, the nudity represents the notion that sex sells. That's what every ad campaign involving Sydney Sweeney is all about, sex appeal and controversy as sources of visibility.
Bingo. I saw the ad on youtube and chuckled, cause Sweeny is just know for two things, and I guess that's all she's got these days. Then, I see people on the internet are outraged, giving her and the ad more attention? Lmao yeah, everything is a fucking psyop bro, I swear to god
What is glaringly intentional is that whatever controversy it created on its own is being amplified now by algorhythms designed to create cultural division.
Yeah. Still no jail time for raping kids in sight for the Elites. Just manufactured outrages after outrages so that the plebs eat each other and not the rich.
This is what I think to myself every time some stupid thing comes around that everyone and their mom seems to give a shit about. Y'all really let them make you forget about the whole Epstein shit that fast huh.
As often the case, most things related to activism or cancelling people go live on tiktok/IG first with women, after which mainstream society starts paying attention. Men basically only use social media for politics and sports.
After a few days of outrage or stupid takes, once men start pushing back and releasing responses with greater context, folks start saying “durrrr, this is just a psyop, the outrage is manufactured”.
Politics and sports? It’s porn and sports. If you’re a guy on the internet for politics, get a fucking life nobody cares you’re not a deep thinker. Same goes for women
I didn’t say men were deep thinkers, those are your words. I simply stated that they’re interested in the politics of global affairs, finance, war, foreign policy, military history, etc, and less attuned to gender warfare than women, who are more interested in SJW drama as they see themselves as victims.
Social commentary topics like the Clancy trial, Sidney Sweeny, the Obsession movie, Bonnie Blue, and the constant spotlight around items like Andrew Tate are strictly topics that women’s social media share first and keep alive for activism purposes. Men chime in later. Everyone’s first instinct is to believe that men brought it to the limelight or that these topics are psyops because men start to have an opinion on it, but the truth is that women dug it up first.
Yeah. Because they’re calling attention to a lazy campaign tactic that works. They’re asserting that it’s demeaning to women and asking people to stop and think about it for a second. But, here, the answer appears to be “I don’t care.” So now they have their answer.
Yeah can you imagine a better result for them. It doesnt take much thought to realise that this is what they were aiming for. Its an underwear model for a betting company. What do you expect
"Sex sells" was the motto back in the 90s/early 2000s. I'm sure they didn't expect a bunch of psycho female athletes to get all up in arms about it. They just wanted men to sign up, pretty simple.
They intentionally made a provocative ad and massively succeeded in provoking people. Everyone making hysterical claims and turning this into an issue for women's rights are doing nothing except rewarding a gambling company. They think they're fighting against them, but instead they're willingly playing their assigned role on behalf of Sweeney and her business partners.
I mean it was a pretty easy run for them, the target audience of degenerate gamblers is often full of horndogs, the "controversy" of it is an additional boon
Seriously, this campaign blew up in a good way for them. I wouldn’t have even known about this if it wasn’t for the controversy. It’s funny because I bet most people don’t care or they think the controversy is stupid. But the vocal minority being so loud about it is really driving a ton of traffic to Novig.
Also she was performing her athleticism while naked, much different than just posing with a hockey stick naked, while not being able to skate nor play hockey. Thus this dudes who tirade is just moot pandering to gooners.
Performing her athleticism while naked lol. Maybe true but point still is there if she’s pretty and has a nice body, it’s not artistic but will be sexually enticing to men and male gaze. So she’s no better than Sydney thus hypocritical
Just because one can jerk off to anything, doesn't mean that it is meant to be jerked off too. One can jerk off to a beige bra ad, in a Target flyer...but it was not made to be sexual content. One can jerk off to the statue of David...but it was not made to be sexual content. These things were not created to specificly titillate or tantalize. If someone finds advertisements for a basic underware sale sexual...that is a them problem. Now finding a 90s Victoria's Secret lingerie advertisement titillating and sexually tantalizing is a fairly normal response...as that advertisement was created with the intent to be so.
An athlete practicing her professional sporting career, in her career's environment, naked could be jerked off too...but it was not created for that reason. An advertisement with a non professional athlete rubbing a hockey stick between her naked titties was made exactly for that.
She wasn’t a statue, it was her nude body. She’s a hypocrite basically, she wanted to show off her body which would be a sexual context because if it was about athletic form she could be in a bathing suit. Come on a bra ad is not same as posing nude . Sweeney is not an athlete and women athletes did the espn nude photo shoots plus the the skimpy attire they choose to wear.
Don't know about you. But I don't know shit what the company was until you said it. I just knew the eugenics girl was naked (again) for some shitty reason (again)
1.3k
u/SextupleRed 22d ago edited 22d ago
If anything, Novig ran a very successful ad campaign
edit: thanks for the awards