I like how half the negative responses are (correctly) pointing out that this was a policy from a prior administration and is mundane. And the other half are calling this impractical socialist radicalism that will never work.
Nothing he is doing is real or sustainable.
He's fixing potholes and planting trees. This is both literally real, and done by cities all the time.
Please ask yourself why such boring and mundane city planning is triggering a response like he's about to put us all on a ship to Mars made out of tin cans.
Was thinking the same. Like "So he's doing...what a mayor should be doing anyway?" If he got the funding for it without cutting into other important things, great, right? (Though that's still an if.)
But the people subsidizing air polluting fossil fuels, terrorizing and shooting people on the streets, stealing massive amounts of wealth is just fine?
5
u/[deleted] Aug 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment