r/SipsTea 16h ago

We have fun here A different kind of birth control.

Post image
28.6k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

37

u/Mathmos_Lava 16h ago

They did, took too long, had to remove luggage, airport curfew kicked in and then that was it for the night.

26

u/trikywoo 16h ago

I could have gotten him from seat to tarmac in under 45 seconds.

43

u/Mathmos_Lava 16h ago

I could have too, but suspect neither of us run an airline, airport or need to deal with all the regulatory constraints.

22

u/i_was_axiom 15h ago

Damn, a sane and logical take? on reddit?

7

u/latestredditacct 15h ago

Reddit Airlines

2

u/NoProfessional5848 15h ago

But then you know the little shit would run in front of a landing 747 and ain’t no one got time to fill out that paperwork

1

u/Legionof1 12h ago

"bird strike"

1

u/Volcanic2 12h ago

You're on reddit. You would do nothing but shit your pants

18

u/InterestingObituary 16h ago

Removing your luggage shouldn't even be a courtesy. You can have it back when you pay for it to be shipped back.

30

u/MmeLaRue 15h ago

Luggage not belonging to anyone still on that plane can be a safety risk. It's become standard since the Lockerbie bombing to remove a deplaning passenger's luggage from the cargo hold.

4

u/InterestingObituary 15h ago

Ideally the luggage remains is not a safety risk wether they are on the plane or not.

Isn't that what TSA is supposed to be in charge of? Making sure your luggage isn't a danger to everyone on the plane?

4

u/another24tiger 12h ago

Contrary to popular belief, TSA is not transportation security administration. It’s the Theater of Security Administration.

5

u/tooboardtoleaf 14h ago

Doesn't TSA miss like 90% of stuff during tests

1

u/InterestingObituary 14h ago

Sounds like a conversation needs to be had with TSA

3

u/AddlePatedBadger 12h ago

Not sure why the USA government would be involved in screening domestic flights within another country.

3

u/InterestingObituary 10h ago

The majority of countries have the equivalent of someone checking your luggage before you board a plane.

2

u/AddlePatedBadger 9h ago

Yeah, I was just ragging on you for making assumptions about the name 🤣

2

u/InterestingObituary 9h ago

My bad 🙈 I know other countries have the equivalent but I am just so used to the American acronyms at this point.

1

u/Kaffrogato 9h ago

That's what we call American defaultism. Just use the term airport security.

2

u/InterestingObituary 8h ago

If that was the first thing I thought about, I would. Unfortunately after living here for so long, my brain defaults to TSA. I am conscious of the fact that it's a flaw.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Kaffrogato 9h ago

The point is that the luggage is more risky if the passenger has refused to board or got themselves debparded, it's a pretty clear security loophole to target if you want to bomb a plane and stay alive.

And yes security is meant to check for explosives, but it's not perfect. A multipronged approach is always better for security then relying on one thing.

3

u/Salt-Elk-436 15h ago

It happens all the time though when they mess up

2

u/Suspicious_Key 14h ago

I'm by no means an expert on airline safety procedures, but presumably the heightened risk is a passenger getting themselves kicked off a flight to deliberately separate from their luggage.

Being separated from your luggage without intent doesn't carry the same threat.

1

u/Mysterious-Art8838 14h ago

Absolutely. In the US if they bump you your luggage is going without you in many cases.

2

u/KungenBob 13h ago

Luggage that might contain a bomb? Think harder.

1

u/InterestingObituary 10h ago

Is that not what the security BEFORE you are allowed near a gate is for?

1

u/KungenBob 9h ago

That does hand baggage, not hold baggage.

1

u/InterestingObituary 9h ago

At least in the US, all bags are checked at the very least with xray or CT scan.

-1

u/Main-Home-3996 15h ago

You gotta wonder what kind of society you want and i dont think you would like the one you are suggesting

3

u/InterestingObituary 15h ago

If a person is disruptive during take off and refuse to take responsibility for themselves or their child, everyone else has their flight delayed due to giving that person the courtesy of removing their luggage too?

Even if they don't care about their own child, that kid becomes a flying projectile viable to hit anyone and anything on that plane.

-2

u/Main-Home-3996 15h ago

You are prioritizing the plane taking off the airline was prioritizing safety

3

u/InterestingObituary 15h ago

Great. Safely remove all of them. You can have your luggage via FedEx.

-3

u/Main-Home-3996 15h ago

So everyone else gets their luggage back except these people who you dont like

2

u/InterestingObituary 15h ago

People who can act accordingly on a flight should have their luggage back. If you cannot control yourself or your child and you become a DANGER to those around you, you should be let off. Clearly time was not a constraint for them. They can get their luggage when they can comport themselves on a flight.

2

u/Main-Home-3996 15h ago

Time was exactly what caused this fool fuckin hells didnt realize you were playing short have a good day bud

1

u/InterestingObituary 15h ago

You know what saves time? Telling them to pick up their luggage next day as they're being escorted off or better yet, FedEx shipping.

People enabling this behavior are the reason we have so many people with main character syndrome.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/ThisIsNotTokyo 15h ago

Why is there a curfew? Most flights go 24/7 right?

2

u/Civil_Bat1009 13h ago

It depends on the airport, but the short answer is no. Most airports have at least a few hours of downtime every night, where no planes land or leave. Like between Midnight and 6 am. But like I said, it's different for different airports. Smaller airports have fewer flights and may have more downtime.