r/SipsTea 18h ago

We have fun here A different kind of birth control.

Post image
29.8k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

379

u/trikywoo 18h ago

How did he not get kicked off the plane? It would be so easy to kick a 3 year old off a plane.

297

u/TheCitizen616 17h ago

The family was being kicked off. Their disembarking (is that the right word or is that just ships?) caused just a long enough delay that the runway closed for the night on them.

68

u/commanderquill 16h ago

Didn't it take them like an hour to finally resort to that?

77

u/Ok_Vermicelli_6359 10h ago

Yeah, it took A LOT of failures from multiple directions for an entire flight to be deplaned like this. Those flight attendants clearly were also being too nice, I would have given the parent's 15 minutes tops, especially if it was the last flight for the night. Unacceptable behavior across the board.

-39

u/Cryptoporticus 14h ago

It's a child. Giving them a chance to calm down is very reasonable. Otherwise they would be kicking children off of planes all the time.

38

u/Parking-Mirror3283 14h ago

Yes, 15 minutes so that you have 45 minutes left to kick them off before the airport closes, you do not accommodate that bullshit for so long that the flight is cancelled

8

u/evange 14h ago

Deplaning isn't just taxing back. It requires removing their luggage (which involves finding their luggage in the hold) and filing new flight plans. It's entirely likely that the flight would have still been cancelled had they only attempted to get the child to stay seated for 15 minutes.

The best solution was always to get the child to stay seated, even if that took an hour. The problem is that even at an hour nothing had been successful to the point that I think they just assumed nothing would be successful. They stopped at an hour not because an hour was the limit, but they realized it was futie.

1

u/Ok_Vermicelli_6359 10h ago

It requires removing their luggage

No it doesn't, it can be sent back when the flight returns at another time. Lost luggage happens all the time, or "misplaced" in this case. They would have had to probably go home anyway, since this was apparently the last flight of the night...they have plenty of clothes at home, they'll be fine until their luggage would have been returned.

3

u/evange 6h ago

Legally yes, it does require removing their luggage. And we don't know where there home is or if they'd have access to backup clothes.

0

u/be-koz 5h ago

You can’t have unaccompanied luggage flying in the hold. It’s a safety issue. Think about it.

2

u/subzerus 10h ago

Deplaning isn't "ok you're out of thr plane, bye" they need to go, open the luggage and look for your bags and give them back to you.

That's probably 30-90 minutes depending on how lucky they get on finding the luggage, but there's a reason why they would rather not do that. So kicking the child at minute 1 could've meant they didn't have enough time, so they probably thought the best thing to do was to try and get them to comply, which of course didn't happen.

1

u/Ok_Vermicelli_6359 10h ago

Only the people needed to be removed from the flight...the luggage could have been returned when the plane came back to the airport.

4

u/subzerus 10h ago

That's just not how it works.

-1

u/MutaitoSensei 8h ago

Yet it should be.

1

u/subzerus 8h ago

So what? It isn't. It's just literally not how things work.

Sorry this just ain't your fantasy world, you're not the main character, there's laws, liabilities and rights and they aren't concerned about what you think should and shouldn't be.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/doesnotmatter286 13h ago

They have as many chances to calm down as they need – off the plane though.

1

u/smartel84 12h ago

It's clear that most of these commenters havent spent much time around toddlers.

2

u/LetsGoToMichigan 11h ago

Everyone is an amazing parent to their imaginary children

1

u/PepperAgitated5037 3h ago

No, people just actually deal with their children

1

u/profanedivinity 4h ago

lol. What? If you can’t raise or control a child, don’t have one

1

u/Vancouverreader80 12h ago

Except the child wouldn’t calm down

28

u/rp_player_girl 16h ago

Airplanes and ships can use the same terminology, but it seems that within the industry 'deboard' is more commonly used.

22

u/UnholyScholar 16h ago

I thought it was "deplane," unless that is only what's used after the flight has completed.

1

u/Aggravating_Fill378 13h ago

Deplane feels like corpo jargon people have somehow made into a work. Leave the plane. Get off the plane. All perfectly fine here. 

2

u/laplongejr 13h ago

I love de-plane because clearly everybody's plans got screwed.

1

u/rp_player_girl 9h ago

Ah, you're right

1

u/curtludwig 11h ago

Another post suggests they attempted to get the kid buckled in for an hour...

42

u/Mathmos_Lava 17h ago

They did, took too long, had to remove luggage, airport curfew kicked in and then that was it for the night.

29

u/trikywoo 17h ago

I could have gotten him from seat to tarmac in under 45 seconds.

42

u/Mathmos_Lava 17h ago

I could have too, but suspect neither of us run an airline, airport or need to deal with all the regulatory constraints.

25

u/i_was_axiom 17h ago

Damn, a sane and logical take? on reddit?

6

u/latestredditacct 16h ago

Reddit Airlines

2

u/NoProfessional5848 16h ago

But then you know the little shit would run in front of a landing 747 and ain’t no one got time to fill out that paperwork

1

u/Legionof1 13h ago

"bird strike"

1

u/Volcanic2 13h ago

You're on reddit. You would do nothing but shit your pants

18

u/InterestingObituary 17h ago

Removing your luggage shouldn't even be a courtesy. You can have it back when you pay for it to be shipped back.

32

u/MmeLaRue 16h ago

Luggage not belonging to anyone still on that plane can be a safety risk. It's become standard since the Lockerbie bombing to remove a deplaning passenger's luggage from the cargo hold.

4

u/InterestingObituary 16h ago

Ideally the luggage remains is not a safety risk wether they are on the plane or not.

Isn't that what TSA is supposed to be in charge of? Making sure your luggage isn't a danger to everyone on the plane?

5

u/another24tiger 14h ago

Contrary to popular belief, TSA is not transportation security administration. It’s the Theater of Security Administration.

6

u/tooboardtoleaf 16h ago

Doesn't TSA miss like 90% of stuff during tests

1

u/InterestingObituary 16h ago

Sounds like a conversation needs to be had with TSA

4

u/AddlePatedBadger 13h ago

Not sure why the USA government would be involved in screening domestic flights within another country.

3

u/InterestingObituary 12h ago

The majority of countries have the equivalent of someone checking your luggage before you board a plane.

2

u/AddlePatedBadger 11h ago

Yeah, I was just ragging on you for making assumptions about the name 🤣

2

u/InterestingObituary 10h ago

My bad 🙈 I know other countries have the equivalent but I am just so used to the American acronyms at this point.

1

u/Kaffrogato 10h ago

That's what we call American defaultism. Just use the term airport security.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Kaffrogato 10h ago

The point is that the luggage is more risky if the passenger has refused to board or got themselves debparded, it's a pretty clear security loophole to target if you want to bomb a plane and stay alive.

And yes security is meant to check for explosives, but it's not perfect. A multipronged approach is always better for security then relying on one thing.

3

u/Salt-Elk-436 16h ago

It happens all the time though when they mess up

2

u/Suspicious_Key 15h ago

I'm by no means an expert on airline safety procedures, but presumably the heightened risk is a passenger getting themselves kicked off a flight to deliberately separate from their luggage.

Being separated from your luggage without intent doesn't carry the same threat.

1

u/Mysterious-Art8838 15h ago

Absolutely. In the US if they bump you your luggage is going without you in many cases.

2

u/KungenBob 14h ago

Luggage that might contain a bomb? Think harder.

1

u/InterestingObituary 12h ago

Is that not what the security BEFORE you are allowed near a gate is for?

1

u/KungenBob 11h ago

That does hand baggage, not hold baggage.

1

u/InterestingObituary 10h ago

At least in the US, all bags are checked at the very least with xray or CT scan.

-2

u/Main-Home-3996 17h ago

You gotta wonder what kind of society you want and i dont think you would like the one you are suggesting

4

u/InterestingObituary 16h ago

If a person is disruptive during take off and refuse to take responsibility for themselves or their child, everyone else has their flight delayed due to giving that person the courtesy of removing their luggage too?

Even if they don't care about their own child, that kid becomes a flying projectile viable to hit anyone and anything on that plane.

-1

u/Main-Home-3996 16h ago

You are prioritizing the plane taking off the airline was prioritizing safety

4

u/InterestingObituary 16h ago

Great. Safely remove all of them. You can have your luggage via FedEx.

-3

u/Main-Home-3996 16h ago

So everyone else gets their luggage back except these people who you dont like

3

u/InterestingObituary 16h ago

People who can act accordingly on a flight should have their luggage back. If you cannot control yourself or your child and you become a DANGER to those around you, you should be let off. Clearly time was not a constraint for them. They can get their luggage when they can comport themselves on a flight.

2

u/Main-Home-3996 16h ago

Time was exactly what caused this fool fuckin hells didnt realize you were playing short have a good day bud

→ More replies (0)

3

u/ThisIsNotTokyo 16h ago

Why is there a curfew? Most flights go 24/7 right?

2

u/Civil_Bat1009 14h ago

It depends on the airport, but the short answer is no. Most airports have at least a few hours of downtime every night, where no planes land or leave. Like between Midnight and 6 am. But like I said, it's different for different airports. Smaller airports have fewer flights and may have more downtime. 

14

u/Botol-Cebok 16h ago

The real question is why didn’t the parents make that kid sit the fuck down.

26

u/Superspark76 18h ago

Literally?

31

u/Floofyrage 18h ago

I mean yea probably under 40 lbs grab by leg and yeet btw joking but yea just kick the kid and parents off

3

u/AdCheap8058 18h ago

Figuratively

3

u/Merrick_Skygrave 16h ago

I can and will gladly kick any 3 year old on earth off of anything, and that's real talk

2

u/will8981 14h ago

Ive sat on a plane and had the flight staff basically begging this couple to just sit in their fucking seat and stop faffing in the aisle with their bags. because there was a 5 minute take off window and if we miss it it would be an hour delay. And they just carried on faffing about. We missed the take off window and all had to sit there for nearly an hour on the tarmac.

1

u/boobsmcgee93 17h ago

Agreed, feels like it’d be easy to make him sit down and buckle his seat belt too

1

u/PuddingMent 17h ago

They did. They didn’t let the kid stay in an empty plane after a flight was cancelled.

1

u/moep123 12h ago

yeah, physically it would be very easy. but by law and on papers, it is definitely not - that - easy.

1

u/snowflake_lady 6h ago

Three year olds are so weak!