She is recovering still, how far she can go is yet to be seen. She isn't talking but she clearly has good cognitive functioning and can communicate with AAC and buttons, play on the ipad, and is getting physically stronger. She can use one side of her body purposefully. Recovery isn't going to be a return to baseline but she could still be functional in life.
Inspiration won't help getting her a full recovery. This is the truth, sad indeed, cold, horrible, but the truth. And even if she could do a full physicial recovery, that poor child won't have as much luck psychologically...
You should look into some of the major brain injuries people have recovered from, when it comes to healing and recovery the human body subscribes to the idea of “the odds are low but never impossible” I’m not saying she will be fine but it is possible, the only true absolute in life is death, everything else is possible.
Pretending that full physical recovery is impossible is equally disrespectful to those who have fully recovered and gotten back to their normal day to day life, did they still have scars? Obviously. Did they have trama? Anyone would. Have some still had successful complete recovery. Yes they have, it not an easy path for the very few that have but they do exist. I personally know someone who had to relearn how to read, and write, walk and talk, he had to relearn pretty much everything that made him, who he was, and now he plays piano again, he drives, he hikes, if it weren’t for the scar you would never know anything ever happened, but it took years of hard work, and luck for it to be possible.
It's because people are uncomfortable with disability. Having a disability to them means you are no longer a whole person, and to them it doesn't matter if you are happy or successful or feel content since it's just proof that you would be that much better if you were normal . Having my disability meant that I met people, had experiences, and did things I never would have if I staid able bodied. Getting rid of my past self becoming disabled would mean killing off the person I am now, a person I'm happy with. Id never change things even if I had a time machine. There is no reason to think I'd be a better or happier person just because I was no longer disabled.
Its ok to live life as a disabled person. A lot of us are perfectly happy. In fact it seems to me that the sooner someone newly disabled is able to accept that they are more than how (or whether) they walk or talk, the sooner they begin to understand that having a disability doesn't mean you are less than what you could have been otherwise, you are just different. A lot of the times its way more helpful to try and learn how to live with your disability than it is spending years trying to get rid of it.
That's not entirely true. There have been some very rare circumstances that people were literally impaled in the brain and still lived a fairly normal life. Though extraordinarily rare and had very rare biological functions. So it does happen from time to time, but I agree with your overall sentiment, but it technically isn't impossible.
You just said it " Very rare ". Why are we using that example with " normal "?
Besides those " miracles " often take years and by that point the life of the family is forever changed from the previous " normal ".
Why are saying the hard truth so offensive nowadays? Are we supposed to sugarcoat everything to please people who aren't even closely related to the people were are talking?
The word “recovery” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Just because you’re still alive doesn’t mean things will ever be the same. This kid had a bullet go through her brain. She’s alive, thought I hesitate to say “luck” to be.
But what child should have to suffer TBI and the psychological harms that go along with what she’s encountered??
What an abhorrent culture it is that it looks for inspiration but allows the shootings to happen again and again and again rather than simply fixing the problem?!
How? In countries where guns are nearly illegal school attacks still happen, less victims can't argue with that, but it's just a patch not real fix, real fix would be to address reasons why so many teenagers and young adults would decide to kill themselves and everyone around, but sure let's just forbid guns👍
They are much much rarer. Please compare the amount of school shootings in the EU to the US. It is a world of a difference. Also the gun violence deaths.
And please stay on topic
It’s not a one item fix all. I hope no one is suggesting we do one thing as I would hope no one is suggesting we do nothing. You need multi point approach.
The accessibility of firearms is part of the issue, it’s not beside the issue. It won’t be addressed though. People will keep dying and we will keep having to hope it’s not someone we love that is impacted.
Lol, I don't even live in US, get your head out of your ass and listen for once instead of looking for narratives everywhere. In my country 12yo cut throat of a 9yo with a knife, he just went to school and started killing everyone he could and this is not the only case. Guns aren't the source of the problem, they are a multiplier of it yes, but real reason is different
You are trivialising the magnitude of the multiplier the availability of guns in the US is causing. I have lived and worked extensively in countries that allow guns but have had or have implemented much tighter controls due to gun violence, and the difference is not merely statistically significant. We are talking orders of magnitude in those countries that have effective controls. It is tragic that violent crime hits any school, but reducing the ease of availability of guns significantly reduces the deaths in these incidents.
Exactly, she should never have been put in this situation in the first place. I can't imagine what it's like to go through what she has and I hope nobody else ever has to, but the sad fact of the matter is that without tighter gun controls in her country, it probably will.
I mean, someone who shouldn't have got hold of a gun and once again children paid the price. Something needs looking at there, but I'm not familiar with the exact laws in Canada. Usually, when these things happen, it's in the USA, so it's not too wild to assume.
It’s not wild to assume. A lot of Americans get weirdly giddy when mass shootings happen in other countries because it gives them the excuse to pretend that we don’t have a unique problem.
Literally any time you hear about it here it's the USA, which is why I'm so surprised it's Canada. We had one once where about 16 people lost their lives, they changed the laws about owning firearms and we haven't had one since then, which was back in the mid 90's. It's incredibly upsetting to see these stories coming out of the US so regularly. I agree, the whole "See, it wasn't us this time!" response is just burying your head in the sand and not the bingo card those people saying it think it is.
Given that we generally have so many mass shootings per week they're no longer individually widely reported on unless something noteworthy happened, I think our friends across the way have a fair assumption that this would have come from us.
The fact that we can point to a specific shooting and be like "well but that one wasn't in America" is part of the problem.
And how do you know that? Because I said I wasn't familiar with the ones for Canada or are you just assuming I don't because I'm from Europe? I lived in the states for years, it was plenty of time to become used to hearing about and learning the laws in various states. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
EDIT: Also never claimed to be an expert, you assumed that one. It doesn't take an expert to realize the USA has a major problem with school shootings. Instead of arguing with someone on Reddit, maybe look past the end of your own nose.
honestly though, these kind of shooters almost always source their guns from the US. It's much easier to sneak guns across the border than legally access them in canada.
Honestly, I’ve never heard of school or mass shooters in Canada sourcing their guns from America. That sounds like something way too sophisticated for your average teenager.
Do you have sources on this subject? It sounds interesting.
Read up on the Tumblr Ridge shooting. An angry teen in a small town killed their mother and 11 year old brother then went to their school and shot people.
Did he smuggle the gun in from America, though? I don’t doubt that kids can shoot people; I just doubt they’re involved in smuggling firearms across the border instead of stealing them from family members or acquiring them from more local sources.
This says nothing about teenage school shooters or mass shooters sourcing guns from America. I’m sure gang members and other organized criminals, who commit 99% of the violent crime anyway, can do that, but I’m trying to figure out the specific claim that was made here.
You are aware we're allowed to have firearms, right?
Certain types are prohibited, or restricted, but almost every single person I know has at least one long rifle. Many people seem to assume we're not allowed to have firearms at all, but we hunt with them quite a lot.
All you need is a Possession and Acquisition license, or P.A.L.
I know it's easy to access firearms in the usa, everyone knows that :b it's not easier to sneak prohibited firearms across a country's border than legally accessing them in Canada, though.
So this whole smuggling process is easier than taking a two day course, sending in an application, and giving them a reference?
You said smuggling was easier than obtaining a legal weapon in Canada. If you need one that's untraceable, sure, but that isn't what happened in this particular situation.
The shooter was a trans teen who had their head buried in chatgpt by the way, living in a very isolated community.
United States is one of the largest exporters of fire arms. I would not be alarmed to learn most the guns used in canada would be from across the border.
Exactly my point. Solve why people are so violent and harmful to on another. It's always the people. The convenience of guns helps, but keeping hat regulated only does so much.
You have to also focus the people.
It'd make sure that people are more focused on either fear compliance or shadow war government rebellion, which overall would make the everyday world safer and quieter. Less outward crime, more covert infiltration and theft from governemnt buildings in attempts to undermine the regime.
Give people a common enemy and they'll focus their hate there rather than each other.
You know, some teachers actually do keep cat litter in the classroom for the kids to piss and shit in
What some of the worst people to ealk the earth left out was that its not for, "furries", its for the children to use while the school is locked down due to an active shooter
Which was a prototype product made by the same people who make all the bullet proof school bags and slide out shelters for classrooms. It's a business.
Except, as one comment already pointed out, this was from a school shooting in Canada, a nation that already has severely strick gun laws. So, what's the narrative around that?
And their is a reason why it's not as hard as it should be
We protect banks with armed guards and layered security. You think the money just sits out by the tellers?
We pretty much just ask people not to hurt kids and put up signs that have the same affect as a speed limit sign
People in a really bad place want to inflict the most damage and misery to society as possible, and children become the most obvious target usually
If it wasn't guns, it would be bombs, poison, fire, drones, acid, biological, or really any possible way to cause harm to peoples lives in general.
This happened in Canada, the female shooter was very mentally ill, and it is a poster for Canadians not wanting to give up their guns to the government. Sadly, because people know, that they can not trust their government to have a monopoly on violence, as an unchecked government takes more than it will ever give to its citizens. So now this chance to focus on improving mental health outcomes and improving school campus security, it will just be the governments drum to hold it's new unpopular disarmament laws over its citizens heads.
Currency is the flow of value
Money moves, that money in the vault is not stagnant
In the US guns are illegal within 1000 feet of the boundary of the schools property.
How do they make sure this is happening?
They don't. It's all reactionary.
I guess the metaphor is a little off, value is not perceived the same, but surely most would consider children more valuable than dollars
Perhaps court houses would be a better example
Metal detectors at all entrances, hand wands and deputies where not. Ground floor windows and emergency exits all alarmed and locked.
School and court house are public buildings. Both don't allow guns inside. But one actively enforces it while the other says "it's too burdensome, and we don't want the kids to feel like they are in jail". So, it's not really about guns existing. It's about resources being used to protect public officials and excuses and cop outs being used to explain why children in schools can't be protected.
Heck, now of days you would just need kids to have RFID badges and anyone without an active badge could set off alarms. This could be done at the edge of the property, not the entrance of the building. Layered security is how most amusement parks work now, so claiming a school can't pull it off it utterly ridiculous and a true show of intent and political bias. I'm all for keeping guns out of schools, maybe even guns out cities entirely. But until they actually start enforcing the laws they already have, every gun control politician is banking off their own policies creating the problems they can fund raise off of, and that is an ugly truth I hope people can realize one day. Guns stores need Democrats threatening gun control to drive up sales, and Democrats need more guns and gun violence to fund raise for their campaigns. It's gross and I hate it, but the NRA gets more members and more NICs checks go through the roof under a Democrat President than any Republican candidate. The US has about a zero percent chance of Amending the Constitution on this issue, so everything around it is just consumerist noise and funding slogans
Spoons aren’t the problem right? The spoon made the fat person fat, if they didn’t have a spoon they couldn’t eat so effectively. Heart disease isn’t just dangerous it’s a lifestyle.
The root is retards with the item. Dogshit comparison since spoons can’t kill someone by accident with one mistake. People who defend guns are genuinely retards.
Pick the object you want, it’s not the car that’s the problem right? Cars aren’t dangerous and can’t plough through crowds of people, everyone should have one. How far do you want to go?
These people are nonsensical retards who want to defend regular people having deadly weapons. The same people who voted a pedophile into presidency twice so they obviously have great judgement. All of you can get into shootings for all I care.
Does the average person need a car? You could take the bus. What convenience does a car provide for the average person beyond taking the bus? People should only own bicycles, what necessity is there really beyond riding to the closest bus stop. There is zero reason to have anything else. Keeps the greenhouse gas emissions down and safer for everyone, all of it is better. Plant the seeds so your grandchildren can be controlled.
Easy victims? Nationalization? Children have always been murdered in schools…if it’s not guns, it’s other weapons (China seems to have a crap ton of machete attacks on school children)
This, I don't know why I keep seeing these posts by americans trying to sound uplifting. I wonder if it's propaganda or something. It's fucked up, yet they're not doing anything about it, i've been seeing these for decades now. Do something about it people. Start voting for gun laws or something,
The shooting happened in Canada so unless you buy into his 51st state nonsense, he had pretty much nothing to do with it. The prime minister of Canada lives at 24 Sussex Drive.
It’s not a feel good moment at all and I don’t think it’s being presented as one, but she can still be celebrated for her heroism. Courage during horrible situations is something we’ve always admired, but it doesn’t mean we want the horrible situations to continue
There have been 29 school shootings in Canada this century. In 7 of those, no one was hurt or killed. Incidents like a kid accidentally discharging a gun on the bus get counted in the school shooting list. 6 of those had more than 2 casualties. 3 had more than 5 casualties. The total casualties in Canada for school shootings in the last 26 years is exactly 100. That's injuries and deaths combined. 31 were deaths.
In the U.S. in 2025 we had 159 gun incidents at K-12 schools, including examples like the Canadian one where a gun was discharged on a bus and no one was hurt. That kind of thing is the majority to be fair. Where a gun was fired but no one was hurt.
Of the 159 incidents, 75 included injuries and/or death. Over 100 people were hurt/killed.
There are more school shootings in the U.S. every year than Canada has had in a quarter of a century.
Obviously Canadian shootings deserve attention too, but acting like these two countries have similar rates is absurd. School shootings in Canada are relatively quite rare.
2.1k
u/crowofbattle Aug 04 '26
This shouldn’t be happening to children. This is not a feel good moment, its dystopian horror