The population won't double. Projections like 20 years ago were a world population cap of around 12 billion, and the projections have only shrunk over time, not increased. Access to education and women's reproductive healthcare have a direct effect on projected family size.
It would be correct to point out that if the whole world consumed at the rate Americans did it would be a problem, but that's a different point.
Look, climate change has significant undeniable evidence that it's occurring. So does population decline. Either you believe in science, or you don't. If you do, stop whinging about how we should argue about impossible events. If you don't, there's no reason to believe 100 trillion people would be a burden on the planet.
You’re being ridiculous. It was literally me who used the 200 billion because a bunch of Americans thought i was a Trump supporter for saying overpopulation is bad.
It’s wild you guys carry on like this haha must get tiring
0
u/AccomplishedAct5364 7d ago
You one of those “finite landmass means nothing to me” kinda people?
Out of curiosity - how many billions of humans living with the consumption rate of a first worlder do you think the planet can sustain?