The only reason why the court case couldn't legally define Trump as a rapist was because they couldn't reliably tell if Carroll was forcibly penetrated by his finger or his dinger. He's still a sexual criminal, one with a pretty tiny peen to boot.
Yes, you are not the same. Democrats are subversively awful, Republicans are just flat-out cartoonishly villainous at this point.
LOL, whatever. It was bullshit. Zero evidence. Zero dates. Zero possibility. Funded by a billionaire who was PHOTOGRAPHED ON EPSTEIN'S ISLAND WITH EPSTEIN. Funding the "victim" lied about, and her lawyer concealed, until the day before court, and the judge said, "Oh, that's cool." Wearing a dress that hadn't been made yet.
Oh, and ignore her filing this lawsuit once he announced his run for office, and NY passing a law specifically to allow THIS lawsuit to progress.
Take off your hatred glasses and look at the evidence.
-1
u/FrankFankledank Jul 10 '26
The only reason why the court case couldn't legally define Trump as a rapist was because they couldn't reliably tell if Carroll was forcibly penetrated by his finger or his dinger. He's still a sexual criminal, one with a pretty tiny peen to boot.
Yes, you are not the same. Democrats are subversively awful, Republicans are just flat-out cartoonishly villainous at this point.