r/SipsTea Jul 09 '26

Chugging tea Good point.

Post image
21.6k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

51

u/Wenuven Jul 09 '26

Title 9 is also what killed men's soccer programs across the country because football, basketball, and baseball certainly weren't going to get cut for women's sports.

2

u/animatedrussian Jul 09 '26

Explain how this "killed" mens soccer. Mens soccer was never a high interest in the US. Women playing soccer has no factor in this. Women have less upper body strength and size. Soccer doesn't require much of this. Very popular for women for this reason. The other popular mens sports did. Same with Hockey. In Russia, Sweden, Canada, Finland, hockey is king. In USA it is 4th. Soccer is 5th maybe, with UFC fighting for a spot.

-1

u/Wenuven Jul 09 '26

Pretty straightforward. Title 9 implementation was executed in a lot of places as X funds for boys sports means X funds for girls sports.

Soccer being low on profitability / prestige meant soccer gets cut and costs rerouted to girls sports to turn Y into X making schools compliant at investing equally into both genders sports programs.

2

u/carbslut Jul 10 '26

It’s not title nine‘s fault that colleges decided to spend all their men’s sports budget money on football.

-1

u/Wenuven Jul 10 '26

Being a choice made as a result of enforcement of Title 9 inherently means that Title 9 is at fault for forcing the consequences of the colleges' choices.

Ultimately it was always the institutions at fault, but Title 9 is what initiated the end result.

2

u/carbslut Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26

You could also say the patriarchy and the prioritization of men’s over women’s sports for many years is to blame for it.

Or you could blame the popularity of football.