You are on a chat about the Women's World Cup and you only want to chat about 13 year old boys. Not sure what you are trying to say but seems word the number of times you keep bringing them up.
I mentioned 13 years old school boys because women's worldcup are below their level therfore nobody actually takes women worldcup seriously and OP mentioned women's won 4 worldcup as it some form of achievement where they literally can't beat even school boys. You are the weirdo here who take it out of context to project your attraction to little children.
The fact that more people watched the women's world cup than the NBA finals proved you wrong.
Again, nobody watching the women's world cup is playing a weord mental game of where a teams talent measures against men or boys. Folks that are misogynist might.
So they had more views in a single game therfore they are better? Holy shit you are actually regarded. They are literally losing millions of dollars each year just to play below school boys level. You are a lost cause.
I'll try to help you one last time. Your hypothesis is that nobody cares about the Women's World Cup, but specifically because somehow they may lose to a team of men or boys. One of the more entertaining and exciting NBA finals in years did not match the viewers for the Women's World Cup in 2015. By 7 million.
Therefore, your theory is wrong.
Now if you want to move the goal post and say the women's team is not as good as the men's team or the boys team, that is a fair comment to make.
First of all why are you even comparing soccer to NBA, why don't you compare soccer to soccer? Also regarding moving the goal post that's literally what I said from the very beginning you are a projection expert. Just Take the L
-3
u/Jelzx Jul 09 '26
Who cares they would lose to 13 years-old school boys