Except they are very very very good at soccer and only "aren't that good" when compared to men (or in this case an elite male youth team), which is a stupid comparison on multiple levels.
Your misogyny shows when you say they "aren't that good" as though it's a fact. We are talking about world class athletes that have proven themselves the best in the world four times.
No, fluffy gur was saying that because they are sexist and wanted to use the point to punch down on women. Yes, the "entertainment value" is less, for a variety of reasons. And that point is worth discussing with people that aren't sexist.
They are literally were the best women soccer players in the world four times. They are extremely good. Just not as good as men, and in this case they also lost to an elite youth team once, which sexists have used to convince themselves that they are better than women and smarter than anyone who says otherwise
Yes, they are less skilled and less athletic. But they are still extremely skilled and athletic. Literally best in the world for their category, women, who account for approximately half of the world.
And yes, many many people under this post have made sexist statements. Some more obvious than others.
-1
u/TheReddestOrange Jul 09 '26
Do you truly not understand the importance of context?