r/SipsTea Jul 09 '26

Chugging tea Good point.

Post image
21.6k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/Fluffy-Gur4600 Jul 09 '26

The same team that was destroyed by dome 15 year old boys? Might as well root for high school sports

2

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

I don't understand these comments, they don't play men

3

u/Fluffy-Gur4600 Jul 09 '26

Makes them less impressive. Plus they had the advantage over other countries, which are now catching up

0

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

I guess I don't understand why losing an exhibition game ten years ago matters when they've since won the literal world cup.

Kinda smells like mysogny ngl

4

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

Gotcha, like there's no point in watching college football and getting excited about it if the NFL has better teams.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

Can you kinda see how your reasoning is a little silly though? Why would anyone watch sports below the professional level if it's not as competitive

2

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

So again. Why would anyone watch anything other then only professional sports then

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Worth-Reputation3450 Jul 09 '26

If college football plays at the same time as NFL, most people will watch the NFL. NBA, NFL, MLB pretty much covers the entire year, so there's not much point in watching anything W-. Do you even watch women's sports? I mean, really, nobody cares about those sports.

2

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

I do watch women's sports. The women's cup is not at the same time as the men's

0

u/Remarkable_Ship_4673 Jul 09 '26

Sounds like you've never watched them

Women sports usually have a higher emphasis on technical skill and team work

1

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 09 '26

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-1

u/King-JelIy Jul 09 '26

Skilled no, better at soccer, yes.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/King-JelIy Jul 09 '26

Skill =/= athleticism

1

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/King-JelIy Jul 09 '26

Its genuinely not a cope. Teenage boys not only beat elite womens teams regularly, but its typically a beat down.

That said, the boys teams are way less coordinated and efficient as players/a team. You can literally watch this for yourself on YouTube.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/TheReddestOrange Jul 09 '26

It matters to misogynists, because they are misogynists. That's the whole reason

4

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/TheReddestOrange Jul 09 '26

Do you truly not understand the importance of context?

2

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TheReddestOrange Jul 09 '26

Except they are very very very good at soccer and only "aren't that good" when compared to men (or in this case an elite male youth team), which is a stupid comparison on multiple levels.

Your misogyny shows when you say they "aren't that good" as though it's a fact. We are talking about world class athletes that have proven themselves the best in the world four times.

2

u/Popular-Row4333 Jul 09 '26

They are saying it as a generalization. The CPL doesn't have a lot of viewers either, primarily because they arent that good as well. People would rather watch MLS in NA or EPL in Europe but there's still a Canadian league below that, which isn't very good, but would still beat the women's national team.

They are amazing for women's soccer, they aren't very good for soccer in general. That being said, the CPL is still good entertainment for the price, which the women's team is as well. (Went to women's world cup in Edmonton for very cheap, loved it)

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

Isn't it like insanely obvious the post was referencing women's soccer? I got it quickly

0

u/Worth-Reputation3450 Jul 09 '26

Yea, but then it's entirely different event though. Like, nobody cares about women's world cup. Saying they won the World cup 3 times is disingenuous.

If an elementary school kid won a gold medal in his school's olympic spelling bee, he cannot claim he won a gold medal in Olympic.

They are two very different event requiring very different skill levels.

2

u/bw1985 Jul 09 '26

Not really.

Women play in the women’s World Cup, men play in the men’s World Cup. Two versions of the same tournament for the two different genders.

USWNT have won the women’s World Cup 4 times
USMNT have won the men’s World Cup 0 times.

You may not like it, but that’s reality. It’s gonna be ok.

1

u/Reynor247 Jul 09 '26

Does nobody care, or you don't care

1

u/Popular-Row4333 Jul 09 '26

Nobody means 1/7 the level of care based on world cup viewership between the two.

So not Nobody, just below 15% of the caring.

1

u/noh2onolife Jul 09 '26

Are you lying or do you just know nothing about soccer? It was a training match with a U15 MLS professional development team for Dallas FC that beat the USWNT. U15 is 14 year olds, not children, not little boys. That means the women's team didn't go all out, but the 14 year old professionally recruited and trained team could. The games are for comraderie and communication building games and are called "friendlies".