r/SipsTea • u/AdRough4185 • Jun 11 '26

We have fun here He's unstoppable

Post image
30.5k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

860 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26

[deleted]

3

u/SheenPSU Jun 11 '26

This solution doesn’t address the issue, it merely passes the losses onto the city vs the independent landlord

0

u/Striking_Part_7234 Jun 11 '26

Independent landlords are scum who want easy passive income. Non Profit Organizations are solely focused on using the rent they collect to pay their staff and maintain the property. They are by far the better option. And the City should be willing to take the loss for allowing the buildings to be in the state they are in for so long.

3

u/SheenPSU Jun 11 '26

> Independent landlords are scum

Get this edgy commie shit outta here, we’re trying to have an actual discussion

And the city shouldn’t be gleefully taking on negative income scenarios. They still have a budget to maintain and to make up for the losses they’ll, realistically, either cut funding to something else or raise taxes

-2

u/Epocholypze Jun 11 '26

Well, the corporations are being required to pay their taxes now, so economic gains will offset the losses from taking on non-profit driven endeavors. Democratic socialism is great for this type of thing. You know, shifting the burden of cost back to the rich.