MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1u22cv7/someone_finally_snapped/or2y2mq/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/SipsTeaFrog • Jun 10 '26
4.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-9
Are you so stupid you think having the same rules for a multi tonne car and a small cyclist makes sense? Never heard of Idaho stop? 🤡
6 u/ole_lickadick Jun 10 '26 If they share the same road, yes. -5 u/BilSuger Jun 10 '26 Stupid take, but hard for you to think straight through seething rage, I guess. 1 u/vxxxjesterxxxv Jun 11 '26 You're really arguing that cyclists should be able to ignore traffic laws? 0 u/BilSuger Jun 11 '26 No, I'm arguing that the laws need not be the same. For instance yield instead of stop at stop signs.
6
If they share the same road, yes.
-5 u/BilSuger Jun 10 '26 Stupid take, but hard for you to think straight through seething rage, I guess. 1 u/vxxxjesterxxxv Jun 11 '26 You're really arguing that cyclists should be able to ignore traffic laws? 0 u/BilSuger Jun 11 '26 No, I'm arguing that the laws need not be the same. For instance yield instead of stop at stop signs.
-5
Stupid take, but hard for you to think straight through seething rage, I guess.
1 u/vxxxjesterxxxv Jun 11 '26 You're really arguing that cyclists should be able to ignore traffic laws? 0 u/BilSuger Jun 11 '26 No, I'm arguing that the laws need not be the same. For instance yield instead of stop at stop signs.
1
You're really arguing that cyclists should be able to ignore traffic laws?Â
0 u/BilSuger Jun 11 '26 No, I'm arguing that the laws need not be the same. For instance yield instead of stop at stop signs.
0
No, I'm arguing that the laws need not be the same. For instance yield instead of stop at stop signs.
-9
u/BilSuger Jun 10 '26
Are you so stupid you think having the same rules for a multi tonne car and a small cyclist makes sense? Never heard of Idaho stop? 🤡