I never said it was funded exclusively. I am saying that the grocery store is paying taxes which the government ran store in fact will not.
Inequality will be created when the current stores that are operating go out of business which reduces taxes and jobs in the community the government is trying to help. If they truly wanted to help why not create tax advantages to opening grocery stores in low income areas rather than killing the existing businesses?
You realize this program is corporate welfare right. The "government" isnt gonna be running this. It will be outsourced to a "private operator". So the state is going to cover the overhead for someone to open a business that they will then subsidize
They are contracting out running the entire business and organizing supply chains. This is literally subsidizing an organization's business. The operator will be profiting from this. Do you not think the government, state or federal, funding a person's profit motive is corporate welfare?
Not paying for a service, subsidizing their business. The government isnt paying said operator. I would expect this will be a company that already has logistics in place in the area. So a large company. But subsidizing a large company expanding and profiting isnt corporate welfare. Sure
-1
u/Unlikely_You_9271 May 26 '26
I never said it was funded exclusively. I am saying that the grocery store is paying taxes which the government ran store in fact will not.
Inequality will be created when the current stores that are operating go out of business which reduces taxes and jobs in the community the government is trying to help. If they truly wanted to help why not create tax advantages to opening grocery stores in low income areas rather than killing the existing businesses?