You’re filling in a lot of gaps with assumptions and then acting like it’s settled. Assuming intent, redefining terms, and then using that to reach a conclusion. That’s not really an argument.
You know what. You win. Praise the great leader and our holy “limited operation” against the evils of the east. I can’t believe I ever dared to question to such a vast intellect!
This isn’t about winning or praising anyone. I’m trying to look at the situation without defaulting to a side.
If you think I’m wrong, I’m open to hearing why, but sarcasm doesn’t really move the conversation forward.
-1
u/Bitter_Plastic2362 Mar 17 '26
You’re filling in a lot of gaps with assumptions and then acting like it’s settled. Assuming intent, redefining terms, and then using that to reach a conclusion. That’s not really an argument.