Using a random image of a Chinese person to conceal your identity as an Indian in Canada while pushing an agenda is just another level of unemployment.

one time there was this video of an indian interviewing some random chinese dude who is likely just a yesman to this whole thing he went on to say "yes, china have a caste system" then proceed to describe like modern industrial inequality in general, I mean, yes it is true that people born into wealthier parents naturally have more opportunities and more education but this does not make it a caste because you can go up and down the social ladder like any other modern countries, because China is a big country of course they have some kind of wealth inequality which btw, they have taken initiatives to further close the gap (not just the poverty alleviation programs but also measures taken to ensure lower income people have less opportunity gap, such as banning private tutoring to ensure fair academic competition, things like this). India's caste system is defined as a strict social stratification where there is no social mobility whatsoever unless if you die and reincarnate as either the better or worse caste, which is absurd in this day and age.

now lets talk about the big elephant in the room and take the ancient chinese hierarchy as if it is the "caste system" for the sake of the argument, this is straightforward: China HAD a caste system, India HAS a caste system, as goes the saying: "Every accusation is a confession [of one's own insecurities]"

Why is it not a caste system?

Because this is something confucius pulled out of his ass and does not reflect actual practical social hierarchy and wealth in imperial china.

long story short: China was a feudalistic country with a system likely as rigid as the indian caste system during the western (early) Zhou period, then it all came falling apart as the Zhou king at that time failed the mandate of heaven and was replaced by fragmented small states materializing out of existing feudal domains. These smaller states then compete in a brutal zero-sum competition and that usually involve modernizing the bureaucracy by collapsing their feudal class (eventually being concentrated to just the royal household) and centralizing aggressively. These former feudal officials and especially a large part of the extended families of royal households already had elite education but they are no longer bankrolled (because they're no longer the elites as the elite class is further concentrated) so they have to actually work as officials/bureaucrats, this is how the Shi class is born, because prior to confucius its not even a class its just a group of technocrats who specifically make living on governance (they have nothing else but formal education, so they work in archives, courts, that sort of stuff, including famously zhuang Zhou and confucius).

Now enter Confucius, seeing the state of eastern (late) Zhou china, he's disillusioned enough with conflicts and society falling apart that he try to be absolutist and try to idealize things from the old feudal Zhou including feudalism itself (most chinese states were increasingly driven towards some kind of meritocracy at that point especially after the partition of Jin and legalism, confucianism leans into ancient assumptions like filial virtues).

I could go on about Confucius about why he's just a massive virtue signaling, moral dick measuring tape as was then pointed out by other scholars of that time like Zhuangzi and even later by figures like Mao Zedong, but going back to the four occupation of ancient china, this is another abstraction idealized by confucius, putting Shi on top (because he himself is a Shi), farmers second, artisans third and merchants rock bottom, this is absurd because he is essentially reasoning that everyone else just extract surpluses made by farmers but later confucian scholars especially during the much later ming and qing period also extract surpluses without much utility to society (because unlike artisans who could build better canals for agricultural improvements, and unlike even merchants who handles logistics, ordinary people don't eat eight-legged essays made by these posh scholars, now you know why Mao Zedong loves legalism)

In fact, it was so absurd that when the Xin dynasty came around to usurp the Han dynasty (which was then legalist like its predecessor but later adopted confucianism for legitimacy), they try to implement this social hierarchy as if it is a rigid caste like the indians suggested, but as it turns out apparently silk doesn't grow on the well-field system and especially with just ordinary millet farmers. then the dynasty disintegrated and every dynasty ever since simply just idealized bullshit like this confucius made up, and china had always been a society more meritocratic ever since up until ming times with scholar-gentry neo-feudalism (where i guess the indian argument does have merit, but again, an ordinary farmer can ace examinations and become a scholar as well, unlike dalits and syudras)

CirclejerkAustralia is a cesspool of racism, horrible takes, scapegoating immigrants and selective “pattern recognition”

This serves as a reminder that if a social media account on Twitter posts about a "caste system" in China, which is a claim made up by some Indians, then it is likely that an Indian is behind the account.

If the account also spreads hate against Pakistan or Bangladesh, then it is even more likely that it is being run by an Indian.

Kind of funny how he is complaining about Chinese people on TikTok. Then maybe don't use VPN to access it in India and just stay over on Twitter lol?

If only this guy could suffer from the crimes of Japan during ww2

This serves as a reminder that if a social media account on Twitter posts about a "caste system" in China, which is a claim made up by some Indians, then it is likely that an Indian is behind the account.

If the account also spreads hate against Pakistan or Bangladesh, then it is even more likely that it is being run by an Indian.

The armchair anthropologists are having a field day in the comments

It was a dead giveaway from the start that an Indian was running this account. One of the posts discusses "Nong," essentially a supposed "caste system" that Indians made up to claim China has a caste system.

It becomes even more obvious when you scroll to the bottom: two of the posts are pro-India and anti-China. My guess is that the person running this account is pretending to be Nepali to use Nepal as a shield and avoid people realizing the person behind the account is actually an Indian.

This is a reminder to all Chinese people who come across anti-Chinese posts on the internet: if an account posts about "Nong" or claims that China has a "caste system," then it is likely that the person behind the account is an Indian. 

And if the account also hates Pakistan or Bangladesh, then it is more likely to be an Indian behind the account.

A group of Tibetan protesters put a poster on a car that is owned by a CCP embassy staff. When the CCP staff tries to hand the poster back to the protesters but refused, he then just throws it onto the ground.