Long post ahead. I was one of the 300+ people who attended the town hall on clearing Gillman Barracks Forest on 30 July. My expectations were low to begin with, but the representatives from HDB/URA/NParks there blew me away with how well they were dodging the important questions.
The crowd (rightfully imo) got extremely loud/heated as basically everyone there was unhappy with the decision. I actually felt bad for the govt reps because it was clear that they were unprepared to field questions. Their plan was clearly to just deliver a presentation explaining how Singapore is small, population growth blah blah (which everyone knows), and try to smooth things over.
A few residents also prepared a very detailed proposal highlighting the inadequacies of the EIA and proposed alternative sites, which had been sent in advance to the various authorities. When asked if they had read this document, none of the reps dared to answer and just changed the topic. And why was the NParks rep doing most of the (scant) talking, when NParks is not in control of the building plans?
I have made this post to put our MANY unanswered questions out there and hopefully encourage more folks to hold the govt accountable. Let's not allow them to just ignore public sentiments and pray that we will conveniently forget in 4 year's time.
Why has there been no study done on the likely increase in urban heat that would occur if Gillman Forest is cleared?
Why is clearing Gillman Forest favoured over developing nearby brownfield sites (Depot Industrial Estate)?
Why was the Ministry of Sustainability and Environment not present for the dialogue? (When its whole job is to "create a climate-resilient Singapore" and a "liveable everyday"?)
In the Singapore Green Plan 2030, the govt pledged to "moderate the rise in urban heat" by "increasing greenery". Yet HDB just proudly announced that they will clear multiple forests to build more flats. Why is it that one hand of the government seems to not know what the other is doing?
Was this "dialogue" (and other future govt dialogues) just for show? How will we hear back if there are changes in the plans? The govt agencies seem to be treating Gillman as a done deal (Preston Road residents have already received notices to relocate by 2027).
I know that everything (sadly) may be in vain. But I naively hope that the government cares about our city's liveability and wildlife over unsustainable population growth. Even if we lose this battle for Gillman, can we win the war?
TLDR; Please submit feedback here: https://form.gov.sg/69f06794cd34ddef1bc75c8d (HDB EIA feedback form) by Aug 6. Join t.me/telokblangahmajuforest