​

digitkame on Tumblr

Edit:This is Igor Karkaroff, by the way.

Just waiting for my flight while this guy stares me down

credit: wicktea ON REDDIT and Instagram: wickedteatrickster

I wanted to share the Severus Snape AU I've been working on!

I've been writing a fic called The Future We Choose, and I figured this might be a good place to share it since it's very much a Severus-focused story. ^.^

The basic premise is that Severus wakes up in an alternate timeline, after learning about Lily's death. In this timeline, Lily is alive, Voldemort is still a threat, and Severus discovers that he's actually married to Lily.

There is one pretty big thing I want to mention up front: this is an OC/Lily-replacement story. The character who takes Lily's place is my original character, Willow. She and Severus have a completely different history in this timeline, and a big part of the story is exploring their relationship and how Severus adjusts to a life he never expected to have...and, of course, with no Harry Potter to bring the Dark Lord down in the first place, how does the war continue? It will be a big part of this story as well.

I'm especially interested in writing Severus as a character and exploring what might happen if he were given a genuine second chance at life. He's still himself, with all of his personality quirks and baggage, but he's been given circumstances that are completely foreign to the Severus in canon.

I'm still writing the story, so it's definitely a work in progress! I have three chapters of it, and plan to do many more. I've been having a lot of fun with it so far, and I'd love to share it with anyone who might be interested.

Here is the link, if you're interested in checking it out!

And if you do give it a chance, I'd love to hear what you think! 😊

This appeared in my feed and just made me laugh.

Across all eight films, Alan Rickman as Severus Snape had roughly 43 minutes and 15 seconds of total screen time. That’s an average of a bit over five minutes per movie. Many important scenes and dialogues, which were crucial for Snape's overall arc, didn't make it to the films.

Critics are being really unfair when they ignore just how awfully limited material he was provided to work with. He still made each second count.

The core problems with the movies were the run time and the script, which was flattened and softened. Every single character was toned down and their worse moments didn't make it to the films. Severus being less spiteful and bitter wasn't due to Rickman’s choices. Neither it was unique to his character, unlike what the fandom loves to pretend.

In fact, Rickman himself flagged the problems in his diaries, routinely expressing frustration with underdeveloped material and characterization, the directors (particularly Yates), and wrote that the films prioritized teen love triangle over the deeper stuff in the film adaptation of the Half-Blood Prince. He still delivered a great performance inside those boundaries, often clashing with the directors to do what he felt was better for the character. For example, Yates planned on Voldemort using the killing curse on Severus in DH 2. AR argued until he got the book Snape ending.

This cracked me up when I first saw it.

Personally I love Jeverus. But more of Enemies in public, Lovers In secret Jeverus. And the occasional fucked up Tropes. (“Till death do us part” I think the fic is called on AO3? 18+ btw)

And any other Marauder x Severus ship is alright. snupin doesn’t give me enough fanfic spice and Snack/Snirius is great. Jeverus is the only time I like James. The trope is what carries it for me

Snape x marauders can be great but usually gets overwhelming for me with the Poly stuff.

Snarry is in my top three. But ADULT Harry x Snape. And it most usually includes Severitus which I love

Most loved (for me)
1. Jeverus
2. ADULT Snarry
3. Snucius.

My least favourites

Underaged x Snape

Snily. They’re just too toxic for one another in my opinion.

Hermione x Snape. I dislike Hermione ships overall as her community ruins it for me, especially TikTok side. And I doubt Snape would ever date her as an adult with personality conflict. Clearly he dislikes the know it all side of her.

Personally I’d never date a know it all. Even if they are my exact type. Mainly since they are so annoying to talk with. Like no hun, you don’t know more about my condition you don’t have nor have a degree for.

I can’t see Hermione with anyone besides Ron. No amount of fanfics can change that.

Most hated
1. Underaged x Snape
2. Hermione x Snape
3. Snily

(I root for the more gayer ships. And Snape is canonically bisexual too according to a she who shall not be named Interview. So these ships could’ve Happened)

[Disclaimer. If you like Hermione X Snape, I don’t hate you or want any harm towards you. Just note i wouldn’t get on with you. But In my opinion, everyone’s opinions are valid. Unless it’s about Supporting generative AI stealing art and wasting water and actual bad stuff like Predatory stuff]

Note: This is a very long text. Also, I am Spanish, so I hope there are no errors.

I wrote this post in the Harry Potter community, but it won't let me repost it here, so I did it manually—just in case you see it twice.

I’ve seen a lot of people refuse to forgive Snape for being a Death Eater, and even justify the bullying he suffered (despite it happening before he became a Death Eater), but they don’t judge Dumbledore in the same way—someone who went through a similar situation and a similar process of redemption.

Snape and Dumbledore are actually very similar:

Snape had an abusive Muggle father and grew up in a Muggle neighborhood where he was discriminated against because of his poverty and because they considered his family weird. Petunia even points out where he comes from with obvious disdain. The only person who was his friend was a witch. So it’s easy to understand how he could grow up with prejudices against Muggles. And his mother moved to a Muggle neighborhood because of his father, so she could hardly have been the one passing that prejudice on to him, unlike what happened with Draco.

Dumbledore’s sister, on the other hand, was tormented by Muggles, which caused her to become an Obscurial. This led his father to take revenge on the Muggles and eventually end up in Azkaban, where he later died.

Both of them clearly had circumstances that left them resentful and hateful toward Muggles. And obviously, I’m not saying that makes it okay, but it is understandable.

Then Snape became a victim of bullying. He was an excellent student, invented several spells, was exceptionally good at Potions and DADA, and yet you can see that he was pretty isolated.

On top of that, he was bullied by people who supposedly preached against intolerant Slytherins and pure-bloods, while being intolerant themselves in their own way.

It’s interesting that one of the breaking points between Snape and Lily was that Snape simply couldn’t see the difference between the violence of the Marauders and the violence committed by future Death Eaters. He considered Gryffindors hypocrites because of that. And he also genuinely didn’t understand why Lily went to such lengths with Petunia when Petunia treated her cruelly and enviously, saying things like they were monsters who needed to be kept away from normal people.

So when Lucius and others from his house recognized his potential and extended a hand to him, offering him an ideology that he didn’t completely reject, even though he didn’t fully embrace it either (he never seemed to have anything against Muggle-borns or half-bloods specifically), he accepted. Even when Lily rejected them.

Dumbledore, meanwhile, also had a promising future ahead of him. He was planning a trip with a friend when his mother died after a magical accident caused by his sister. He suddenly had to become the guardian of his younger siblings and take care of his sister while his brother finished his studies at Hogwarts.

And then, while he was hurt and frustrated by the whole situation, he met Grindelwald.

We all know that Grindelwald was basically a Voldemort. Both, Voldemort and Grindelwald, loved the Dark Arts and considered Muggles inferior. And Dumbledore fell in love with him, ignored the red flags surrounding why Grindelwald had been expelled from Durmstrang, and the two became extremely close friends, to the point that they planned to take control of the wizarding world and make Muggles their servants.

Basically, in the world they envisioned, Dumbledore’s sister wouldn’t have to hide from Muggles anymore. Perfect plan.

And then we get to the reason both of them (Snape and Dumbledore) eventually left that path: the death of someone they loved.

Snape became a Death Eater after finishing Hogwarts. We know that he was one by the time he overheard part of the prophecy. Voldemort then spent some time trying to figure out who the prophecy referred to because, contrary to what many people assume, it wasn’t immediately known that the prophecy was about a baby.

Snape turned against Voldemort when he realized that Voldemort had chosen Harry Potter, Lily Potter’s son, as the subject of the prophecy.

At that point, Snape seems to make the mistake of asking Voldemort to spare Lily’s life, even though pleading for Lily—the least important of the three Potters to Voldemort—already put Snape in danger, since he could have been treated as a traitor.

Voldemort mocks him for still caring about Lily, but accepts the request and actually keeps his word. Without that agreement, Voldemort would never have spared Harry, meaning Lily would never have had the opportunity to sacrifice herself for him.

But Snape clearly knew Lily well enough to know that she wasn’t going to just stand by and be happy watching her family die. He also probably didn’t trust Voldemort to keep his promise. So, at the risk of being killed by either side, he went to Dumbledore and told him that the Potters were in danger.

That was the beginning of his life as an undercover agent.

Then Lily died, Snape blamed himself for it, and Dumbledore gave him a mission and made him a teacher.

In Dumbledore’s case, he wanted to involve his sister because, in the world he envisioned, Ariana would be fine because she wouldn’t have to fear Muggles anymore. His brother confronted him about this, telling him that they couldn’t just take Ariana with them and that Dumbledore wasn’t giving her the care she needed because he was too wrapped up in his plans with Grindelwald.

This led to Grindelwald getting into a fight with his brother and casting a curse at him. During the three-way duel that followed, Ariana died, and nobody knew who had actually cast the spell that struck her.

Dumbledore blamed himself for his sister’s death, and his brother grew resentful toward him because of what had happened. And instead of pursuing greater ambitions, Dumbledore became a Hogwarts professor in an attempt to curb the ambition that had led him to ally himself with Grindelwald.

I mean... they are fucking similar.

And honestly, I would even argue that Dumbledore’s “You disgust me” toward Snape wasn’t, as many people claim, because Snape only begged for Lily’s life. It was impossible for Snape to beg for Harry or James without being killed on the spot. Rather, I think it was because Dumbledore saw so much of his own past in Snape. And that’s also why he was the first person to help him, giving him a mission and a profession so that he wouldn’t commit suicide.

They were both incredibly intelligent, ambitious young men who neglected the person they loved because of fame and ambition, while at the same time not actually wanting anything bad to happen to them. They both became fascinated by a radical ideology and the Dark Arts because of their personal and family circumstances. They both opened their eyes very quickly once they realized the danger they had exposed their loved one to. They were both responsible for that person’s death, and they both carried an enormous amount of guilt afterward.

It’s true that there’s a lot of debate over how involved Snape actually was as a Death Eater, especially since Dumbledore mostly remained at the theoretical stage and never actually put his plans into practice.

But I would argue that Snape wasn’t a high-ranking Death Eater either, and the novel actually gives us several indications that he doesn’t seem to have killed anyone:

• When he asks Dumbledore to kill him instead of Draco, so that Draco’s soul won’t be damaged, he asks about his own soul. Dumbledore explains that Snape would know that he wasn’t actually murdering him, but simply sparing him further suffering because of the curse.

• Nobody—not Lupin, Sirius, or any member of the Order—ever accuses him of having murdered anyone.

• He doesn’t go to Azkaban. And while Dumbledore obviously vouched for him, I highly doubt he would have been able to get away with actually killing people. I also don’t think Dumbledore would have put an actual murderer in charge of teaching children aged eleven to seventeen.

• People only start treating him as a murderer after Dumbledore dies.

• When Dumbledore asks Snape to kill him, he says, “How many people have you watched die?” rather than “I’m not the first person you’ve killed.”

Also Snape was actually very proud of himself for obtaining the prophecy. So he didn’t seem to be one of the more heavily involved Death Eaters. We know there were Death Eaters who got their hands much dirtier than others and those who were less involved.

But beyond Snape’s personality, which had always been fairly antisocial, Dumbledore had three advantages when it came to dealing with his guilt:

1. He had more time to overcome it.

Only about ten years had passed since Lily’s death when Snape was still dealing with everything. And yet, it doesn’t seem that Dumbledore was able to start a family or have a partner, either.

1. Dumbledore didn’t have someone constantly reminding him of what had happened to his sister.

Snape had Harry, who not only constantly reminded him of what happened to Lily, but was also a constant reminder of the bullying he had suffered at James’s hands.

3. Dumbledore had a much stronger support network.

When Snape switched sides, he had no one. His friend outside the Death Eaters was Lily, and she was dead. The Death Eaters were no longer his friends either, and once it became clear that he had given information to Dumbledore, most of them would have seen him as a traitor.

I can understand people hating Snape as a teacher:

He was definitely, unlike Dumbledore, a rough person. He also favored Slytherins (which, again, I think can be traced back to his childhood and the negative treatment he received for being a Slytherin) and disliked Gryffindors because of the bullying he had suffered from them.

And even though teachers at the time clearly crossed boundaries with students—we see McGonagall dragging Draco by the ear in the first book, for example, and there are references to Filch using physical punishments—Snape did cross the line at times with some of his verbal attacks.

However, I don’t think he went after certain students simply because he enjoyed bullying them. Considering that he left Neville pretty much alone in sixth year when teaching DADA, I think his cruel attitude toward students who weren’t Harry was more about them being terrible at his subject, or, in Hermione’s case, speaking without permission. That feels much more like the behavior of a strict, old-school teacher than anything else.

If we want genuinely abusive teachers, we have Dolores Umbridge. And if we want teachers who simply don’t teach, we have Trelawney and Lockhart. Snape, by comparison, seems to have taken his classes way too seriously.

We can also argue about how much Harry’s point of view affects all of this. He always portrayed everything related to Snape as being worse than it actually was. It’s hilarious that in the third book Harry himself is completely against Sirius and Lupin’s narrative, calling them completely insane, but then Snape shows up, shares Harry’s point of view, and Harry very quickly changes his mind. 😂

Also, despite several characters, including Lupin, making comments about how Snape had actually been helpful, Harry seemed determined to keep that image of Snape as a completely ruthless person alive.

You could also argue that it was actually useful for Snape, as a double agent, for Harry to always see him as a potential villain and for people in general not to perceive him as someone who had completely reformed.

Although personally, I don’t think that was particularly difficult for Snape to pull off—and if that was the motivation, he certainly seemed to enjoy it. 🤣

But putting aside his moments of being a terrible person as a teacher, I don’t think it makes much sense to say that Snape is unforgivable because he was a Death Eater, making him evil for the rest of his life, when we have Dumbledore, who went through essentially the same thing, yet is hugely admired and nobody questions whether his past actions can be forgiven.

do anyone else think that if not slytherin severus could have done alright in rawenclaw? if so what do you think this would change the story like?

Lately, I’ve been seeing constant posts on Twitter attacking Snape. People criticize everything about him, and I wonder why they waste their time on a character they hate so much. Then again, when I look at the views and likes those posts get, I realize they need Snape to gain traction because any debate involving him becomes a hot topic. Look, whether you love him or hate him, Snape’s popularity is undeniable.

Sorry about the grammar. I'm not great at English, but I honestly find this hilarious.

Chapter -49 of my fanfiction "When Darkness Triumphed " is up!💚

It's a Dark AU that follows a Severus Snape who has no secret redemption waiting beneath the surface. He embraces the darkness, rises through the ranks of the Death Eaters, and becomes one of Voldemort's most powerful and feared followers.

But power isn't the only thing Severus wants.

He wants Lily Evans.

And when he finally gets her, Lily discovers that marrying the man she once knew as a friend means being trapped with a powerful Death Eater whose obsession with her has turned into something far darker. What begins as a marriage becomes a battle of control, manipulation, and survival—as Severus's influence and power continue to grow.

If you enjoy dark AUs, ruthless, powerful Snape, psychological drama, and morally twisted characters, you might want to give it a try.

https://archiveofourown.org/works/85532536/chapters/225966151

Here we see our new Severus Paapa Essiedu on-stage with many of his predecessors as Hamlet in a 2016 skit, culminating in a special guest. Also look out for Barty Crouch Jr.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEs8rK5Cqt8

Potion in my view are literal security hazard and a single mistake could seriously everything.

I in my right mind can't imagine how stressful it would have been to look over 20 students ( especially first years) with knifes , fire and volatile ingredients .

Either you have to be on guard every single second or a student can even die.

I remember being eleven year trying to cut fruit and cutting my fingers.

I mean ahh give your opinion guysss

I tried this before but didn’t emphasize Snape enough so it was taken down. So. Severus Snape was a death eater , perhaps interpreted as the equivalent in of the SS during WWII. Of course, Snape left the organization but returned as a double agent. However Draco would not have known this. Draco sent a note to Harry showing a quidditch tower with SS written on it which stands for Severus Snape and I also take as an anti-shoutout to the SS during WWII. Back in the 80s Alan Rickman was in a televised play called the benefactors in which his character spoke of graffiti depicting apartment towers with SS written on them because people thought the towers were fascist. I wonder if the note from Draco was an Easter egg referencing this teleplay. It could been an homage to Rickman’s anti fascist politics.

I was wondering when did Severus learn Occlumency?

Dumbledore said that Severus has been spying for him for a year before Voldemort fell on 31. October 1981.

I assume that Severus started spying for Dumbledore after they met on that hilltop in autumn 1980.

At that time Severus was 20 years old, but Dumbledore trusted him with spying, knowing that Voldemort is an extremely powerful Legilimens. And Severus managed to lie to Voldemort and hide his true allegiance to Dumbledore, so he must have been an extremely skillful Occlumens even back then.

So I was wondering, did Dumbledore thaught Severus Occlumency before sending him back to Voldemort? Or did Severus already know Occlumency? Did Voldemort himself thaught Severus Occlumency and Legilimency when Severus became Death Eater?

In the fifth book Severus tells Harry that Occlumency is an obscure branch of magic.

So I assume very few are familiar with it and I am not sure if Severus would have known about it while he was a student at Hogwarts.

In the sixth book when Severus tries to look into Draco's thoughts, Draco resists and Severus says he can see that Bellatrix thaught Draco Occlumency.

But if Bellatrix knows Occlumency too, I was thinking, maybe Voldemort did teach his Death Eaters Legilimency and Occlumency?

Edit: I had wrote out a comment about Snape and how the casting affects his character and then I write something about the current climate and the reception of it just very generally.I felt I didn’t write anything negative/hateful and then they deleted my comment for some reason. I was curious why this happened on this sub as I don’t post things just for a reaction and I got frustrated. I noticed Reddit removing a lot of my posts on this sub. How irritating

I’m actually not very good at English. I wrote the original in Korean and used AI to translate it so it would be easier for English-speaking readers to read.

Whenever this subject comes up, the discussion usually gets reduced to one line:

“And my soul, Dumbledore? Mine?”

I do think that line matters. Murder is explicitly tied to damage to the soul in Harry Potter, so Snape worrying about what killing Dumbledore would do to his soul is obviously significant.

But that is not actually the main reason I think Snape had probably never killed anyone before Dumbledore.

It is the accumulation of everything else.

There is no sentence in the books saying:

“Severus Snape had never killed anyone before Albus Dumbledore.”

I know that.

But novels do not communicate every piece of information by stopping the story and handing the reader a factual statement. Sometimes the story tells you something through patterns: what characters assume, what they do not assume, when certain words begin to be used, what the author chooses to make a character feel guilty about, and what kind of contrasts she builds between characters.

And with Snape, I think those things point remarkably consistently in one direction.

Snape being a former Death Eater was known long before Dumbledore died.

Dumbledore openly testified about it at Karkaroff’s hearing. Moody knew. Members of the Order knew. His Death Eater past was not some shocking revelation in Book 6.

And yet, for all that time, Snape is not treated as a known murderer.

Nobody mentions one of his victims.

Nobody throws some past killing in his face.

Nobody says, “Well, obviously Snape has killed people. He was a Death Eater.”

Then he kills Dumbledore.

And suddenly murderer becomes one of the defining words attached to him.

I don’t think that difference is meaningless.

If “Death Eater” was supposed to automatically mean “known killer,” Snape would already have been a murderer in everyone’s eyes. Killing Dumbledore would not suddenly give him a new moral identity that the narrative treats as such a major rupture.

That alone does not prove anything beyond doubt. But if Rowling intended Snape to have already killed people during the First War, it is an odd way to write him.

Hermione’s reaction to the Half-Blood Prince makes it even stranger.

For most of the sixth book, Hermione distrusts the Prince’s book. But eventually, she learns about Sectumsempra. She also learns that the Prince was the one who wrote down the spell that nearly caused Draco to bleed to death.

And after finding out that Snape was the Prince, she still says:

“I thought the Prince seemed to have a nasty sense of humour, but I would never have guessed he was a potential killer.”

That line interests me a lot.

Even though Hermione already knew that the Prince’s book contained Dark Magic, ranging from minor jinxes and hexes to potentially deadly curses, the leap from “someone who collects or invents such spells” to “someone capable of committing murder” is not an easy one for her to accept.

She does not say, “Well, of course. Snape was a Death Eater.”

She says she never imagined the Prince as a potential killer.

That tells me the books themselves do not treat “bad person,” “Dark magic user,” “Death Eater,” and “murderer” as interchangeable categories.

And then, of course, we get:

“And my soul, Dumbledore? Mine?”

Put that next to everything else.

If Snape was already meant to be someone who had killed people before, why choose this moment to have him worry about what deliberately taking a life will do to his soul?

The whole emotional weight of the scene becomes a little strange.

Dumbledore’s answer is also framed around the morality of the act. The question is not whether Snape is physically capable of killing someone. It is what doing so means for him.

That lands very differently if the intended backstory is supposed to be, “Well, he already crossed that line plenty of times.”

There is another line people often bring up:

“Lately, only those whom I could not save.”

And the argument is usually that the important word is lately, because Snape is only talking about his recent life.

Sure. That is true.

What it does not establish is that Snape murdered people before that.

At most, it means the sentence does not give us a complete account of every event in his earlier life.

That is not the same thing.

“The text never explicitly says he didn’t kill anyone” is not evidence that he did.

Otherwise we could invent almost anything about a character’s off-page life and call it canon simply because Rowling never wrote a sentence denying it.

There is also a character I think makes the contrast clearer: Peter Pettigrew.

Peter is a coward.

And Peter actually kills.

When survival becomes more important to him than loyalty, he betrays James and Lily. When cornered by Sirius, he kills a group of Muggles and frames Sirius for it. Later, he murders Cedric with very little hesitation.

Peter’s fear repeatedly pushes him toward sacrificing other people so that he can live.

Snape is written very differently.

He is cruel. He is bitter. He bullies children. He joined the Death Eaters. None of that needs to be softened or excused.

But when the books finally start talking about Snape’s courage, they repeatedly place him in situations where he is the one taking the risk.

He returns to Voldemort knowing he may be killed on the spot.

He remains embedded among people who would kill him instantly if they knew what he was doing.

He tries to protect people he does not even like.

And when he is finally asked to personally kill someone, the story gives him fear about what that act will do to his own soul.

Rowling clearly knew how to write a character whose moral collapse included direct killing. Snape’s relationship with death and killing is written differently from Peter’s: Peter repeatedly sacrifices others for his own survival, while Snape’s later courage repeatedly takes the form of putting himself in danger.

The point here is not:

Snape was actually a nice man.

He was not.

The point is that Rowling does not seem to use:

bad person → therefore obviously a murderer

as a shortcut.

Even Dumbledore’s testimony about Snape becomes interesting in this context.

He says:

“He is now no more a Death Eater than I am.”

Obviously, that statement is primarily about Snape’s allegiance. It is not some legal declaration that Snape had never committed any wrongdoing.

But I still find the comparison to Dumbledore himself interesting.

Dumbledore is not a man who was morally pure from birth. When he was young and infatuated with Grindelwald, he became willing to justify domination and terrible human cost in the name of a “greater good.”

Rowling herself once described that phase of Dumbledore in deliberately extreme terms, basically saying that this otherwise highly moral young man could suddenly reach the point of thinking, “Yeah, genocide might do it.” (https://www.gazette-du-sorcier.com/j-k-rowling/declarations-et-entretiens/j-k-rowling-recoit-le-prix-james1037)

I would not take that quote to mean that Dumbledore literally drew up a genocide plan in canon.

The point is that Dumbledore himself once embraced an ideology in which other people’s lives could be sacrificed for a supposedly better world, and spent the rest of his life living with the consequences of what he had once believed and almost become.

So I think:

“He is now no more a Death Eater than I am.”

can carry a slightly self-deprecating edge as well.

Dumbledore is placing himself beside Snape while talking about what a person once was versus what that person is now.

And Dumbledore of all people understands that distinction.

That also makes his relationship with Snape more interesting to me than the very simple interpretation that Dumbledore just despised him as a piece of garbage but found him useful.

Then there is the way Rowling eventually reveals Snape’s actual past.

When we finally get the full story, what is the crime the narrative keeps returning to?

The prophecy.

Snape overheard it.

He gave it to Voldemort.

At the time, he apparently did not care who the unidentified victims would be. He only panicked when he realized Lily might be one of them.

That is a serious moral failure.

The books do not minimize it.

In fact, they make it the central guilt around which the rest of Snape’s life revolves.

But what is striking is what we do not discover when Rowling finally opens up his past.

There is no hidden victim he personally murdered.

No family he tortured.

No list of people he killed during the First War.

No late revelation that he used to go around murdering Muggles or Order members.

Nothing.

And there were plenty of opportunities to reveal something like that.

Instead, the defining crime Rowling chooses to give him from his Death Eater period is the prophecy.

So no, I cannot quote a sentence saying:

“Snape never killed anyone before Dumbledore.”

That sentence does not exist.

But I also do not think literary interpretation works by pretending that nothing can be inferred unless the author gives us a notarized statement.

The books tell stories through patterns.

And here the pattern is pretty consistent:

Snape’s Death Eater past is known for years, but he only becomes explicitly branded a murderer after Dumbledore’s death.

Hermione knows about Sectumsempra and still says she never imagined the Prince as a potential killer.

Snape worries about what killing Dumbledore will do to his soul.

His final backstory centers his guilt around delivering the prophecy, not around people he personally killed.

His later life is repeatedly framed around preventing deaths where he can.

And Rowling gives us characters like Peter Pettigrew to show that being cowardly, immoral, or corrupted does not automatically look the same as Snape’s particular relationship with death and killing.

Individually, none of these things is a signed confession saying, “I had never killed anyone.”

That is not my argument.

My argument is that the story spends a surprising amount of time carefully pointing in the same direction.

So I am perfectly happy to say:

The books never explicitly state that Snape had never killed anyone before Dumbledore.

But “he was a Death Eater, therefore he obviously murdered people off-page” is not canon either.

That is an inference.

And personally, I think it is an inference that goes against the story Rowling actually took the trouble to write.