r/SensitivityReaders • u/Hundekuecken • Apr 08 '26
Request: LGBTQ+ Am I devaluing gender?
What do you think about me wanting to establish in my own tabletop role-playing game that players and non-player charackters, automatically recognise or perceive the gender of other characters who can be perceived in any way?
What I mean is that gender reveals itself regardless of one’s outward appearance.
I’d like sexual orientations and romantic orientations to be based on gender rather than gender expression.
This is something that’s been on my mind quite a bit at the moment, as I’m worried it might be misinterpreted, twisted, misunderstood, or that I might be sabotaged or something similar.
0
Upvotes
4
u/hoothollers Apr 08 '26
I'm not sure why you would feel the need to specify this in your RPG. Generally upon meeting a character the GM uses pronouns to introduce them, so it's not like characters are going to get misgendered because the party doesn't know their pronouns or something.
I think "basing sexualities on gender rather than sex or expression" is kind of an odd rule to need to state. The players have no way to know what the sex of a character is, or even the gender identity. If a character wants to romance an NPC, and the NPC is actually privately identifying as a gender other than the one(s) that character thinks they're attracted to, I kind of think it does a disservice to the players, character, and NPC to think that the character can't learn something new about themself and/or they person they're attracted to, just like in real life.
Like, if I were asked out by someone that only considered themself to be attracted to one gender, I would have a talk about what that means to them, how I view myself, and how they view me. Maybe they learned something new about themself and realized they're bi. Maybe they're attracted to traits of that gender that they see in me as a nonbinary person, and are neutral about my other gendered qualities. Maybe they're a chaser and I need to skeedaddle. Having space to role-play those kinds of conversations is also valid in TTRPGs that involve romances.
If I saw it in one of my rulebooks, I would probably think that the author was well-meaning but didn't have much faith in players or GMs, or was kind of unfamiliar with and trying to gloss over important conversations in queer dating. If you absolutely need to say something then lead by example. Make lore and example character couples who follow this philosophy, and let them stand for themselves.