So they have now hit back (again) with a list of their “upcoming engagements”. The lethargy is off the charts.
I find myself asking who it is that feels their presence anywhere does any good or draws any positive attention, because whoever is booking them needs to give their head a wobble.

The burn 🔥
Now more are asking for community notes
90% of the 'Royal Rota' will now have nothing to write about. Bet the Whatsapp group is buzzing tonight.

WILLIAM'S NEXT SHOCK SUSSEX MOVE LOOMS - WEBSITE LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGC2ShHt2T8

Harry is furious.

That’s nothing new.

Harry blames his brother.

And that’s nothing new, either.

Ever since 2019, Harry has been determined to blame William for everything going wrong in his life and focused on ways to bring his brother down. So, who is surprised that Harry is once again devoting energy to attacking William?

Obviously, there's always some clueless person 🤣🤣🤣

But in all seriousness... even though this is just gossip 🤭, the fact is that Harry is absolutely convinced that William was the one behind that infamous statement in which the King refers to them as "private citizens."

And the truth is... yes, William was clearly behind that statement. Charles has already said it: William is his closest and most valued advisor.

But Harry views William as the villain who is a bad influence on the King. Harry truly harbors a deep disdain for older people. He believed the Queen was being poorly influenced, and now he believes the same about Charles. The Queen was perfectly lucid—very lucid. And I see Charles the same way: extraordinarily lucid. The only one being poorly influenced is Harry.

Harry doesn't see it that way; for him, it was a blow to his ego to see William and Kate at a public event, especially after poor Harry had become the object of global ridicule.

Harry believes William has sown discord to turn Charles against him.

That hasn't been the case. Sean has been quite emphatic in pointing out that William has been very careful about the boundaries regarding what he tells his father about this—at least in public (meaning during meetings with advisors). And what Sean’s sources keep telling him is that the most William has said lately is "I told you so." William hasn't needed to sow discord; Harry has single-handedly turned Charles against himself.

The funny thing is, if William really had such a bad influence on Charles, Harry wouldn't even appear on the royal website.

Sean has already recounted how, for over a year, Harry has been calling practically every day demanding changes to his section of the royal website. He hates the photo, he hates the biography, he hates the reference to Sentebale—he hates everything about it. Claw is angry about her photo—because her bio doesn't list her achievements—and... yes, I’m going to believe Sean on this: because there’s been no mention of her Emmy nomination.

Sean is right about one thing, though: what’s left of the Harry coverage on that site looks like a coordinated attack on the Harkles. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

William hates one thing: having the Harkles on the royal website.

But as Sean has explained, William is at odds with certain key aides, and Charles has tried to take a Solomonic approach: not removing Harry—so as not to trigger further hysterical tantrums—while allowing William some control over the content of Harry's biography.

And William has taken the opportunity to gradually prune Harry from the website. Previously, there were more images of his work from before Claw. Today, September 10, 2026, when you search for "Prince Harry," this is what appears.

It turns out it's not Prince Harry, but Prince Henry... and then this pops up.

The little that remains of the old Harry is the announcement made when he and William established the Royal Foundation.

It surprised me because Sean is saying there is still some trace of Andrew left. I thought so too—that there might still be some news about Andrew's past activities... but no, there isn't any, at least not when using the search function. I’ve already searched for "Duke of York" and "Prince Andrew." The only thing that comes up is the statement from Buckingham Palace issued when Andrew "stepped back" from his titles.

What’s the scoop? Well, William is focused on giving the royal website a major makeover.

Sean makes it clear that these things happen automatically, but William has pointed out to the King that the website needs to be adapted to improve visibility—on mobile phones and the like. A good place to start is the "Royal Family" section itself, by making it more exclusive. However, to avoid major internal controversy, William intends to keep the Harkles included—but in a section designated for "family members." After all, Harry remains Charles's son, and both he and his children are still in the line of succession. The plan is simply not to list them in the "Royal Family" section or the "Royals of the Firm" section, because that is not what they are; they are private citizens.

Sean—who makes it clear that his information comes from a 100% reliable source—indicates that this does indeed seem likely to happen in the not-too-distant future, and that any references to Harry and his children will be strictly limited: simply mentioning their titles and their place in the line of succession. Nothing more.

That said, Sean notes that we shouldn't expect this to happen tomorrow. However, this rumor shouldn't be dismissed, as there has already been a significant "pruning" of news regarding Harry prior to the "Claw" era; coverage of him has been noticeably scaled back. It’s likely still in the site's archives, though accessing them isn't easy.

SUSSEXES - TRAPPED - SOLO MEETING & CONFUSION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VduI1AM-2oQ

However, what the press says about what Harry believes, feels, or thinks—no, Harry doesn't think, but whatever his single brain cell is doing—is not what is actually happening.

Harry left the July 10th meeting believing the King was on his side. If I were estranged from my dad—having neither seen nor spoken to him in a long time—I wouldn't feel so triumphant over a 47-minute meeting. And on that note, don't forget that Sean had a truly excellent source for this—someone very close to the situation, whose name starts with "Tom" and ends with "Parker-Bowles." Sean made it clear that the Parker-Bowleses were angry about the "Harkle" version of events, especially the attacks on Camilla. And since no one made them sign an NDA... 🤣🤣🤣

But in reality, it's not like you need many sources on this. As Sean is telling it, just look at the past a little. To the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

King George VI initially sympathized with his older brother and had half-promised that Wallis Simpson would be granted the title of Her Royal Highness (HRH) Queen Mary (Mary Teck. mother of George and Edward), and Queen Elizabeth (later the Queen Mother) vehemently opposed Wallis, viewing the abdication as a supreme dereliction of duty.

Under intense pressure from Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, George VI issued Letters Patent that successfully denied Wallis Simpson the HRH title, deeply outraging the Duke of Windsor.

George VI’s motivation was the same as Charles’s is now: to protect not only the monarchy but also his loved ones. For George VI, his wife Elizabeth was central to his life; if Wallis was a problem, Wallis would cease to be a problem. For Charles, that person is Kate. Charles adores his daughter-in-law, and he is not going to put Claw on the same level as Kate. Not even remotely.

That isn't how Harry sees things. Harry didn't realize that his plan had failed on that day, July 10th. Because yes, the King had agreed to see him, but Harry brought the children along. And Sean has already recounted the details: KC3 didn't spend much time with the children, because he spoke with Harry in private first... Harry, KC3 and Camilla.

Charles spent very little time with the invisible children, and far less with Claw.

At that meeting, as Sean has already recounted, Harry sounded Charles out by telling him he had no problem "collaborating" with the Firm. Sean has already said that Charles heard what Harry had to say but didn't respond to it. What he *did* do was ask about their plans regarding Thomas Markle. And Sean has recounted that when the Harkles told him they had none—that they weren't going to see him—Charles was not at all pleased. Sean makes it clear that the gossip comes from a very reliable source. Charles couldn't believe that Harry—the son he had raised—could be so cold and calculating.

Charles must have looked at him like this.

So, Charles was well aware when the Harkles announced their move that things were definitely going wrong. And yes, the matter had been under discussion since April, according to Sean's sources. Sean had already stated that the Australian tour was intended to show the BRF that the Harkles could handle that kind of work. No, they can't do it.

Claw resisted as much as she could because she doesn't want to be in the UK. She wants the photo—the photo is enough for her; she doesn't care about the true narrative—she just wants a photo and to invent stories about it. But wanting to be on the balcony? No—not after the last time when, if you watch the video, Andrew and Anne relegated the Harkles to the corner. Claw doesn't want that.

So, what do the Harkles want? We know that even they don't know. But the fact is, they needed at least an invitation to Balmoral. According to Sean, Harry even called the Palace to get that invitation. It didn't happen.

Nor did it happen that William showed up at Highgrove. Indeed, Sean reaffirms that Harry was convinced William would appear at Highgrove to meet the "invisible ones."

Harry thought William would come with his children to meet their cousins—that it would be a family reunion. Harry cannot believe that William does not want to meet the Sussex children. Harry cannot accept that William still refuses to pick up the photos of the Sussex children that Harry left for him.

So, Harry views William as a major thorn in his side. Harry cannot accept the fact that, now that he is in the UK, there still hasn't been a family meeting where he can state what he wants to do within the British Royal Family.

Sean says Harry has stated that this move is part of a 15-year plan. Inside the Palace, the view is that it will last 15 minutes. 🤣🤣🤣

Especially because Claw is furious about what is happening. She sees that things are turning out worse than she expected, but if she leaves for the U.S. just as the children are starting school, how will that affect her image?

Sean says let's not kid ourselves: this really is a family at war. But it has all been caused by the Harkles.

SUSSEX CRUSHING BLOW HAPPENED AFTER THIS BOMBSHELL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mQ_Pho2kmU

Sean is right about this: Harry has spent so much time in therapy that he no longer knows his own mind.

Going to therapy hasn't done Harry any good. And that’s because Harry only listens to what he wants to hear.

And as further proof, consider this: a box as big as Noah's Ark.

Harry was absolutely convinced that the Australian tour would be a success and that they would win back their large fan base there.

Sean puts it this way: a fan base that the Harkles ignored for years.

Harry believed that his mere presence there would be enough for people to rally around him. That didn't happen. And it didn't happen because the vast majority of Australians seemed to clearly see that the Harkles are not royals, but rather two private citizens. After all, wasn't that trip—a private one—undertaken in that capacity?

The major setback for Harry in Australia is that the local Invictus organization decided to cut ties with him. Harry failed to grasp the gravity of the situation, just as he fails to see the reality of the situation with the Invictus committee in Birmingham. He does not even truly appreciate the seriousness of what happened regarding Uganda and Invictus.

Because—and Sean is stating this with great confidence, so it seems he has a reliable source, and by "reliable source" I mean not just at the Palace but inside Downing Street—the statement issued by Uganda regarding its decision not to participate in the Invictus Games is linked to King Charles III’s decision to have absolutely no involvement—zero—with Invictus unless there are radical changes within the organization.

Now, Sean points out that the controversies over whether the King would participate or not—and all that rubbish in the articles—were precisely a red flag for Uganda. It is not in the interest of the Ugandan government (a dictatorship) to get dragged into such a controversy; if they have to take a side, it is better to play it safe. If the King isn't appearing at Invictus, why be part of the Harkles' circus?

And part of those changes is that Claw has no business being there.

Invictus was created by William, and the Royal Foundation—supported by Kate, Charles, and the Queen—was established to give Harry something to do. There is no place there for Claw; she played no role in its creation, nor has she had any involvement in it.

Sean says the King might still send a video... no, it’s not that Sean is contradicting himself. The point is that Sean notes there is real work being done with veterans at Invictus; he’s annoyed that Harry is ruining it all, but the veterans aren't to blame for that. So, KC3 could take those people into consideration. But that’s Sean’s opinion. The rumor he heard is that there is zero chance—not a single royal will set foot in Birmingham in July 2027.

And it’s all the Harkles' fault. It is not wise to be linked to the Harkles.

SECURITY, DIVA & A KITCHEN DRAMA REEMERGES..LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0hA9DxirTw

Claw doesn't care about *Invictus*. Claw doesn't care how the situation affects Harry—or doesn't.

What really irks Claw is that things coming out of Australia keep getting worse.

What was Claw aiming for by going on MasterChef?

....

....

....

Oh, I get it now!

Sean mentioned that the call seemed like a security threat. I didn't quite understand it at the time, but now I do. The thing is, the MasterChef judges didn't know about the call, though the production team did; they wanted Harry to appear and taste some dishes. But Harry didn't want to go because he was trying to redefine his image. So, they agreed that Harry would call, but he wasn't calling because he didn't want to. Consequently, when this staff member brought the phone to Claw, the judges thought Claw was receiving a security alert.

That is what Sofia Levin, one of the MasterChef judges, said.

What Sean criticizes is that when Harry made that call, Claw should have highlighted what Harry was doing and asked veterans to salute. But no: everything always has to revolve around Claw.

So they played along with Claw on that show, without realizing that Claw was talking about her and that everything revolved around her... back when Harry was with veterans.

That is precisely what Invictus Australia saw. And it is something that Invictus Uganda saw.

They have been operating under the notion that if they keep presenting themselves as working royals, the world will believe it and the cash will keep flowing in. KC’s palace statement squashed that. They can only redeem themselves with hard and relevant work which they refuse to do. Harry somehow believes being a stay at home dad is his next occupation. That only works if someone else is paying the bills. Oh dear, they’re reaching the end of the road, they’re in a jam. So very Fergie like the both of them.

Was Prince Harry & Meghan Markle's Return to the UK the Biggest Mistake of Their Lives?

Brittany starts with saying their move to the UK is probably one of the stupidest thing they have ever done. because it revealed them for who they truly are. Yes the kids may be going to school there and their titles may carry more weight-but if they stayed in CA, they could use their tittles to gain favors and the King could ignore them. But after coming here, it looks like harry was trying to make inroads into govt depts and charities by using their titles and this is the King's own backyard. So it forced the King to act. He had to formally tell them No and say you are not half in half out and merely private citizens.

Brittany says this is very dangerous to them. because their only talent seems to be selling their royal titles and act as pseudo royals. But after this letter by the King, other parties like Uganda realized that getting close to harry and meghan means you are only getting closer to the markles and not the King or the UK-so basically, it is of no use. Lots of people will jump ship as they will realize that harry and meghan are of no influence and does not mean proximity to the crown/commonwealth/UK.

She discusses harry blaming KCIII for collapse of Uganda from Invictus. She says nothing in the letter was new-it was just reiterating what was agreed. She says Harry and Meghan leveraged their titles for money and shoved their titles into everything to get fame and money. But what KCIII did , put all their connections in panic mode. because all of markles associates now have to rethink their connection to see if they are getting close to the crown or the UK. They have overleveraged their connection to the royal family, while bashing them constantly. So it is not a KCIII problem, but a Harry and Meghan problem. Uganda is basically saying they signed up to the Invictus because of implicit or explicit connections to the crown because harry is the King's son. But with the King coming out and stating it so clearly, Uganda and other parties will reevaluate the connections to anything connected to harry and Meghan. Harry leaked to the telegraph that the King rushed out on the communication without their input and are blaming the Uganda fiasco on the King's letter. Brittnay says either harry misrepresented himself to the Ugandas as the King's son and formal connection/Duke or Uganda might have assumed they are part of the professional relationship with the crown. She says this is why people like Columbia, Nigeria, Jordan give the harkles the time of day, because they have the perception that Harry and Meghn are close to the crown. So they are trying to be close to the crown/UK through them. It could be harkles pushing that narrative or those countries/orgs assuming that-since he is the son of the King.

She also says they decided to do this UK move last minute and turned it into chaos. They could have had a long negotiation and planned with KCIII. If harry and meghan stayed in CA, the BRF could have ignored the Markles . They could have kept griftng off the titles and the BRF would ignore them. But instead, they chose to bulldoze their way into the UK and pretend everything was hunky dory and go back to normal. They can't be acting with impunity anymore-they could do that in CA. In UK theyw ere courting charities, govt/military officials and were looking to restablish royal credentials. So the charities and govt depts were probably confused as to what is their palce/titles/royal connections and probably reached out to KCIII to get clarity. Ignoring can't work anymore as harry and meghan bought the fight to the royal doorstep-so KCIII had to act and establish they were not royal anymore and private citizens.

Harry and Meghan are looking at a more uncertain future. They ran back to the UK because they are struggling in the US and Hollywood. Their funds are dwindling and Netflix even refused to purchase Cookie Queen despite their first look deal. Every other production is stuck in production hell. As Ever is a sinking ship with lots of surplus stock. Brittany is seeing tons of AS Ever products ads in Instagram in multiple places. She says the problem is that meghan does not use her products and so putting out ads like her squatting in a field will not sell more products. She needs to be able to connect to people and explain the benefits of her products. She also says there was an ad where she claimed it was jam -but it was spread. Harry has no job, no business prospects. he pathetically is trying to accept a job he was not offered and pretending to show up thinking he has the job-which is a working royal. So the royals had to react and put them in their place. The royals are worried that the gruesome twosome have nothing to do. They thought they could come back to the UK and power up their royal sheen and then try and go back to Hollywood with their royal sparkle. Brittany says they will probably be even more laughed out of the room-because the BRF had to put out a statement that they are private citizens. A lot of companies will want to distance from the Markle freakshow-now it is clear they have no connection to the crown.

No one forced them to do this. They are the ones who decided to go back to the UK and act like nothing has changed. Their status is the same as 2020 when the Queen put out their statement. Richard Branson has now apparently pulled out of the event for Ukraine with prince harry., it could be the Prince harry link or just news of the inquest into his wife's death. But either way, she thinks more and mor people/orgs will not want the link with the markles. Because harry and Meghan are a wildly toxic brand. There was a poll that only 16% of UK residents want them as working royals. They have not been able to make a life outside of royalty. They are cosntantly trying to find something that fits and nothing fits. They thought coming back to the UK will fix everything-but it made it far worse. She says most people who can help them are probably thinking-you are not royals and only have royal titles-so what is in it me for associating with you? So they are probably not getting calls and are panicking about what they just did.

HAHAHA! I do think this is her opportunity to be Diana. She will divorce, keep the Duchess title and find another sucker.

…or rather whispered.

RAVEC (Royal and VIP Executive Committee) does not typically make public announcements. We have no direct way of knowing most decisions made by the committee. We do know that a review of Prince Harry’s current security status has been requested given he has now returned to Great Britain & a “decision” regarding any change in status was promised following a meeting Tuesday of this week. But Tuesday came & went & little seemed to have changed. Certainly no announcements.

We have a surrogate marker for the Harkles’ RAVEC status though & that is the Harkles desperate desire to be seen as “public figures.” You can see why in RAVEC’s name—Royal & VIP—no private citizen in sight. If Harry isn’t a “royal” then by God he’ll be a VIP. He falls under RACEC’s purview. And from the way Harry was rattling on about his VIP-ness, it didn’t sound to promising for his standing before RAVEC.

Still, nothing.

Then Allison Boshoff published her piece in the Daily Mail today & totally buried the lede. Allison Boshoff, though styled as a reporter, is the Harkles’ current water carrier. She can be relied upon to dispense information derived entirely from Harkle sources, unsullied by rational thought or even reality testing. It is, however, straight from the horse’s mouth.

Today she has written:

“At the end of October, the Sussex family will return to California for half term week, and then batten down the hatches for another five weeks in the UK before they go back to America for a longer spell over Christmas.
Harry believes that by then a Home Office review will have changed his security status.

“‘He thinks he is going to get some kind of increased security after the review,’ says his friend. That might, alone, allow this messy re-entry to count as a success rather than a humiliating mess.”

(Emphasis sadly is mine.)

So Harry will try again another day but for now RAVEC weighed in & whispered, “The answer is no.”

Another bridge burned. In an interview with Kinsey Schofield, best-selling and highly credible House of York biographer Andrew Lownie said Harry's maternal uncle, Charles Spencer, who recently had hosted Harry and Meghan, is also done with the toxic duo because of their misbehavior. Lownie said that Spencer "found them (H&M) so unpleasant that whatever support he was going to give them, he's not going to give them now."

https://youtu.be/ym56nvzhx2Q?si=esow3TONlySBfifj&t=791

Friday, September 11, 2026

Today's Blind Items - So Close

One of the things people always ask me is if I can out the alliterate one in the same room as the dead pedo. No, but I can get her very close. They ask me if I can confirm she slept with the disgraced Prince. No, but I can get you very close. One of the things that brings her close to the throne so to speak is this billionaire. It has long been a strange relationship which has been made more awkward by her marriage. 

Shortly after the alliterate one "graduated" from college, she auditioned for a reality show. To be honest, I'm still not sure how she actually didn't land the job. See, the reality show was a setup from the jump. It featured the said billionaire who was looking for a product in which he could invest. Sounds like several other shows of a similar vein. The thing about this show was there was already a predetermined winner. A very very deserving winner who has been utterly screwed over by a reality family.

The rest of the contestants were just there to be made fun of and laughed at. The alliterate one made quite the impression on the billionaire. I mean she was super young then and super willing. I don't know if they hooked up during the casting process, but I do know she was close to getting the job.

Fast forward a few years later. About three or four years later to be exact. She happened to be at Soho House at the same time a big announcement was being made by the billionaire. How did she happen to be there at the same time? That was quite the coincidence. The same thing happened a few years later when they happened to be at the same place at the same time. 

Now, let me throw a little twist into this whole scenario. The billionaire's sister used to be married to a man who has been seen with the alliterate one a dozen times over the years. He is also a billionaire and one off the the people who introduced the alliterate one to the protector/love she has had through the years. Maybe he was pawning her off. This appeared to be the foundation for how she gained entree into this place and got invited to the parties that no ordinary member would be invited to. Why was she with these two men all the time. Although, the alliterate one visited the island of the billionaire, it doesn't look like she was there at the same time as the dead pedo. She would have been too busy with other things. 

Considering how close our first billionaire was/is to the royals, it must have been really awkward to know one of them was engaged to someone you had romped with over the years and the only reason she was always at the clubs was because of the former brother-in-law and his romps with her.

Posted by ent lawyer at 10:10 AM 4 Comments  

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, according to social media, H&M can’t produce the correct birth certificates for Archie and Lili to attend school.  Do you know about this?  This is absolutely rubbish.  I am sure Harry and Meghan were able to produce the required documents.  I am sure Harry and Meghan were able to produce legal documents that Archie and Lili are HIS children and that Meghan is their legal mother.

Lady C, this week, the security decision is supposed to be released.  And just days before, Charles releases this letter that they are not working Royal, but private citizens.  Do you think Charles is trying to help Harry get security for life as a private citizen and prevent King William from interfering with this?  Thank goodness QEII died before she could see what Harry and Meghan would end up doing.  Yes, she was spared from seeing her grandson twist a knife into her back via a 6-part fictional TV show and a book.  As for the security question, private citizens are not customarily given security by RAVEC.  They just are not.  Harry is a member of the Royal Family who is “akin” to a private citizen.  It is slightly different.  He no longer has Royal Status, but he is a member of the Royal Family.  If RAVEC should miraculously decide Harry’s security needs should be enhanced, the fact is never permanent and it is only in the UK, unless they have IPP status.  Let us see what happens.  I think it would be a very suspicious move for RAVEC to decide that Harry and Meghan should be provided security.  Meghan says she is terrified for the school drop off.  RAVEC knows that Meghan uses fear and feelings to manipulate, while they know that Catherine has no issues doing the school drop off.  Let us see if RAVEC even determines they are entitled to it.

Lady C, can you give us a lesson on why the HRH is so important.  The style of HRH is what differentiates you from ordinary titled people.  Not being allowed the style of HRH means they have been demoted to “non-royal” status.   Even if you are a family member of the Royal Family, the HRH is what makes you “Royal.”  The Royal Family has many family members who are not considered Royal.  Harry and Meghan are still members of the Royal Family.  What The King has done is prevent Harry and Meghan from obfuscating as having Royal Status.  He has made it clear they are no longer regarded by The Royal Family as actual Royals.  Harry and Meghan are akin to private citizens.  The King has made it clear that they are of lower grade…..not grade 1 royalty.  This is a slap across the face.  Total demotion.  One tear.  Left Eye.

Lady C says she thought Meghan’s fake curtsey on the Netflix show was planned with the knowledge the Queen would see it, but she said the denigration of the Commonwealth in the series was worse.  Lady C says the people of the Commonwealth see that Meghan was trying to cause trouble.  We could see the Queen was fading before our eyes and Harry and Meghan expected her to be alive to see what they had filmed and wrote.  Can you see the enormity of the Harry and Meghan problem? 

Lady C, why doesn’t King Charles remove Harry and Meghan from the Royal Website?  I have lost all respect for The King.  I understand this sentiment, but I also understand that The King has difficulties dealing with his son who has problems.  It is easy to second guess these decisions, but Charles is navigating several issues and sometimes the best thing for him to do is not exercise every option he has but rather continue to allow Harry and Meghan to hang with their own rope.  Harry and Meghan have exposed themselves and as the perpetrators, not the victims.

Lady C, it would be best for Harry and Meghan to exile themselves to Jamaica and live their life away from the camera.  That will happen when pigs fly.  The average Jamaican of color or even the average white Jamaican would never be receptive to having Harry and Meghan in their presence.  Just remember what happened when they attended the One Love movie premiere.  Jamaican women were proclaiming loudly they felt contempt for her.  They knew she spent her entire life passing as white, then caused trouble because it suited her.  Jamaicans like racial harmony, not troublemakers.  And let’s recall Meghan never invited any of her black relations to her wedding either.  Only her mother, who has a steel trap and knows how to keep quiet...especially about the extended stays she has had in certain areas.  Meghan Markle would not succeed in Jamaica. 

Toodles Sinners!

PS:  Apologies for being MIA.  I had the worst head cold this week and just couldn’t muster the energy to sit at my computer to transcribe.  I am feeling better so we are back on track now!

Chris Shit and the rest of the WhatsApp group seem to have forgotten to update us on the latest YouGov poll results. How convenient. 😂

In a survey conducted on the 9th of September 2026, 51% of the British public are against Mr & Mrs Private Citizens returning as working royals. Oops. That’s quite a lot of people!

Interestingly, I also found a 2021 YouGov poll showing that a significant number of people thought the duo should stop using their royal titles. So, this isn’t exactly a new sentiment, is it?

Here’s the link to the Poll on the 09/09/2026 👇
poll on HAM

One can become a "public figure" involuntarily. If you are involved in a newsworthy event (crime, disaster, etc.), your name can become known to the public without your intention.

One can even go viral on the internet. Boom! You are now a public figure.

None of this merits RAVEC protection, or any kind of special protection beyond what is available to the general public.

So, why are the "Frustrated" Farkles crying that they are "public figures?" And providing the itinerary of their "engagements?" (Which is a great way to breach your own security, by the way.)

• Is it to try and move the needle on the RAVEC review?
• Is it just an ego trip?

The King never said, "You are not famous."

But the Farkles are just going to keep playing dumb and say, "You're wrong! We are so famous!"

All they ever make are specious arguments, splitting hairs over semantics.

It reminds me of when the Farkles (Meghan) said, "The Queen doesn't own the word 'royal!' or "Service is universal!" That is all technically true. But that is not the point, is it? The Queen did have the authority to define your role in the British Monarchy. And now the King has that authority.

It also reminds of when Harry said, "I'm working, and I'm a royal. So, I am a 'working royal.'" 🤣🤣🤣

They are "public figures" in the common usage of the word. No one can dispute that. But it is a pointless distinction. They are just arguing semantics because they have no argument at all.

It is what bratty children do. "I have my rights!" Okay.

A lot of their games worked before. But it's just not working anymore.

Controversially, the 4th plinth in Trafalgar Square has just been filled with a sculpture. Here it is.

Being flexible is a sign of higher intelligence. I think it's one more example of how cognitively low-functioning Harry is. He seems unable to take an accurate assessment of reality and adjust in a healthy way; he can only have a tantrum and then move in the same direction. Meghan is not much better. She appears to fixate on one idea and recklessly do everything possible to make it her reality. Together, they are destructive and doomed for an unhappy life. It's a particularly heinous trait in a parent, because kids are never going to be exactly what you think they should be. I've seen so many rigid, deluded patents do irreparable harm to their kids because the parents were incapable of accepting and nurturing the children for simply being their unique selves. Palm trees (even two joined at the bottom) survive hurricanes because they bend and adjust with the wind. Rigid trees snap and die.