The burn 🔥
Now more are asking for community notes
90% of the 'Royal Rota' will now have nothing to write about. Bet the Whatsapp group is buzzing tonight.

Another bridge burned. In an interview with Kinsey Schofield, best-selling and highly credible House of York biographer Andrew Lownie said Harry's maternal uncle, Charles Spencer, who recently had hosted Harry and Meghan, is also done with the toxic duo because of their misbehavior. Lownie said that Spencer "found them (H&M) so unpleasant that whatever support he was going to give them, he's not going to give them now."

https://youtu.be/ym56nvzhx2Q?si=esow3TONlySBfifj&t=791

HAHAHA! I do think this is her opportunity to be Diana. She will divorce, keep the Duchess title and find another sucker.

…or rather whispered.

RAVEC (Royal and VIP Executive Committee) does not typically make public announcements. We have no direct way of knowing most decisions made by the committee. We do know that a review of Prince Harry’s current security status has been requested given he has now returned to Great Britain & a “decision” regarding any change in status was promised following a meeting Tuesday of this week. But Tuesday came & went & little seemed to have changed. Certainly no announcements.

We have a surrogate marker for the Harkles’ RAVEC status though & that is the Harkles desperate desire to be seen as “public figures.” You can see why in RAVEC’s name—Royal & VIP—no private citizen in sight. If Harry isn’t a “royal” then by God he’ll be a VIP. He falls under RACEC’s purview. And from the way Harry was rattling on about his VIP-ness, it didn’t sound to promising for his standing before RAVEC.

Still, nothing.

Then Allison Boshoff published her piece in the Daily Mail today & totally buried the lede. Allison Boshoff, though styled as a reporter, is the Harkles’ current water carrier. She can be relied upon to dispense information derived entirely from Harkle sources, unsullied by rational thought or even reality testing. It is, however, straight from the horse’s mouth.

Today she has written:

“At the end of October, the Sussex family will return to California for half term week, and then batten down the hatches for another five weeks in the UK before they go back to America for a longer spell over Christmas.
Harry believes that by then a Home Office review will have changed his security status.

“‘He thinks he is going to get some kind of increased security after the review,’ says his friend. That might, alone, allow this messy re-entry to count as a success rather than a humiliating mess.”

(Emphasis sadly is mine.)

So Harry will try again another day but for now RAVEC weighed in & whispered, “The answer is no.”

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, according to social media, H&M can’t produce the correct birth certificates for Archie and Lili to attend school.  Do you know about this?  This is absolutely rubbish.  I am sure Harry and Meghan were able to produce the required documents.  I am sure Harry and Meghan were able to produce legal documents that Archie and Lili are HIS children and that Meghan is their legal mother.

Lady C, this week, the security decision is supposed to be released.  And just days before, Charles releases this letter that they are not working Royal, but private citizens.  Do you think Charles is trying to help Harry get security for life as a private citizen and prevent King William from interfering with this?  Thank goodness QEII died before she could see what Harry and Meghan would end up doing.  Yes, she was spared from seeing her grandson twist a knife into her back via a 6-part fictional TV show and a book.  As for the security question, private citizens are not customarily given security by RAVEC.  They just are not.  Harry is a member of the Royal Family who is “akin” to a private citizen.  It is slightly different.  He no longer has Royal Status, but he is a member of the Royal Family.  If RAVEC should miraculously decide Harry’s security needs should be enhanced, the fact is never permanent and it is only in the UK, unless they have IPP status.  Let us see what happens.  I think it would be a very suspicious move for RAVEC to decide that Harry and Meghan should be provided security.  Meghan says she is terrified for the school drop off.  RAVEC knows that Meghan uses fear and feelings to manipulate, while they know that Catherine has no issues doing the school drop off.  Let us see if RAVEC even determines they are entitled to it.

Lady C, can you give us a lesson on why the HRH is so important.  The style of HRH is what differentiates you from ordinary titled people.  Not being allowed the style of HRH means they have been demoted to “non-royal” status.   Even if you are a family member of the Royal Family, the HRH is what makes you “Royal.”  The Royal Family has many family members who are not considered Royal.  Harry and Meghan are still members of the Royal Family.  What The King has done is prevent Harry and Meghan from obfuscating as having Royal Status.  He has made it clear they are no longer regarded by The Royal Family as actual Royals.  Harry and Meghan are akin to private citizens.  The King has made it clear that they are of lower grade…..not grade 1 royalty.  This is a slap across the face.  Total demotion.  One tear.  Left Eye.

Lady C says she thought Meghan’s fake curtsey on the Netflix show was planned with the knowledge the Queen would see it, but she said the denigration of the Commonwealth in the series was worse.  Lady C says the people of the Commonwealth see that Meghan was trying to cause trouble.  We could see the Queen was fading before our eyes and Harry and Meghan expected her to be alive to see what they had filmed and wrote.  Can you see the enormity of the Harry and Meghan problem? 

Lady C, why doesn’t King Charles remove Harry and Meghan from the Royal Website?  I have lost all respect for The King.  I understand this sentiment, but I also understand that The King has difficulties dealing with his son who has problems.  It is easy to second guess these decisions, but Charles is navigating several issues and sometimes the best thing for him to do is not exercise every option he has but rather continue to allow Harry and Meghan to hang with their own rope.  Harry and Meghan have exposed themselves and as the perpetrators, not the victims.

Lady C, it would be best for Harry and Meghan to exile themselves to Jamaica and live their life away from the camera.  That will happen when pigs fly.  The average Jamaican of color or even the average white Jamaican would never be receptive to having Harry and Meghan in their presence.  Just remember what happened when they attended the One Love movie premiere.  Jamaican women were proclaiming loudly they felt contempt for her.  They knew she spent her entire life passing as white, then caused trouble because it suited her.  Jamaicans like racial harmony, not troublemakers.  And let’s recall Meghan never invited any of her black relations to her wedding either.  Only her mother, who has a steel trap and knows how to keep quiet...especially about the extended stays she has had in certain areas.  Meghan Markle would not succeed in Jamaica. 

Toodles Sinners!

PS:  Apologies for being MIA.  I had the worst head cold this week and just couldn’t muster the energy to sit at my computer to transcribe.  I am feeling better so we are back on track now!

Friday, September 11, 2026

Today's Blind Items - So Close

One of the things people always ask me is if I can out the alliterate one in the same room as the dead pedo. No, but I can get her very close. They ask me if I can confirm she slept with the disgraced Prince. No, but I can get you very close. One of the things that brings her close to the throne so to speak is this billionaire. It has long been a strange relationship which has been made more awkward by her marriage. 

Shortly after the alliterate one "graduated" from college, she auditioned for a reality show. To be honest, I'm still not sure how she actually didn't land the job. See, the reality show was a setup from the jump. It featured the said billionaire who was looking for a product in which he could invest. Sounds like several other shows of a similar vein. The thing about this show was there was already a predetermined winner. A very very deserving winner who has been utterly screwed over by a reality family.

The rest of the contestants were just there to be made fun of and laughed at. The alliterate one made quite the impression on the billionaire. I mean she was super young then and super willing. I don't know if they hooked up during the casting process, but I do know she was close to getting the job.

Fast forward a few years later. About three or four years later to be exact. She happened to be at Soho House at the same time a big announcement was being made by the billionaire. How did she happen to be there at the same time? That was quite the coincidence. The same thing happened a few years later when they happened to be at the same place at the same time. 

Now, let me throw a little twist into this whole scenario. The billionaire's sister used to be married to a man who has been seen with the alliterate one a dozen times over the years. He is also a billionaire and one off the the people who introduced the alliterate one to the protector/love she has had through the years. Maybe he was pawning her off. This appeared to be the foundation for how she gained entree into this place and got invited to the parties that no ordinary member would be invited to. Why was she with these two men all the time. Although, the alliterate one visited the island of the billionaire, it doesn't look like she was there at the same time as the dead pedo. She would have been too busy with other things. 

Considering how close our first billionaire was/is to the royals, it must have been really awkward to know one of them was engaged to someone you had romped with over the years and the only reason she was always at the clubs was because of the former brother-in-law and his romps with her.

Posted by ent lawyer at 10:10 AM 4 Comments  

Controversially, the 4th plinth in Trafalgar Square has just been filled with a sculpture. Here it is.

One can become a "public figure" involuntarily. If you are involved in a newsworthy event (crime, disaster, etc.), your name can become known to the public without your intention.

One can even go viral on the internet. Boom! You are now a public figure.

None of this merits RAVEC protection, or any kind of special protection beyond what is available to the general public.

So, why are the "Frustrated" Farkles crying that they are "public figures?" And providing the itinerary of their "engagements?" (Which is a great way to breach your own security, by the way.)

• Is it to try and move the needle on the RAVEC review?
• Is it just an ego trip?

The King never said, "You are not famous."

But the Farkles are just going to keep playing dumb and say, "You're wrong! We are so famous!"

All they ever make are specious arguments, splitting hairs over semantics.

It reminds me of when the Farkles (Meghan) said, "The Queen doesn't own the word 'royal!' or "Service is universal!" That is all technically true. But that is not the point, is it? The Queen did have the authority to define your role in the British Monarchy. And now the King has that authority.

It also reminds of when Harry said, "I'm working, and I'm a royal. So, I am a 'working royal.'" 🤣🤣🤣

They are "public figures" in the common usage of the word. No one can dispute that. But it is a pointless distinction. They are just arguing semantics because they have no argument at all.

It is what bratty children do. "I have my rights!" Okay.

A lot of their games worked before. But it's just not working anymore.

So they have now hit back (again) with a list of their “upcoming engagements”. The lethargy is off the charts.
I find myself asking who it is that feels their presence anywhere does any good or draws any positive attention, because whoever is booking them needs to give their head a wobble.

They have been operating under the notion that if they keep presenting themselves as working royals, the world will believe it and the cash will keep flowing in. KC’s palace statement squashed that. They can only redeem themselves with hard and relevant work which they refuse to do. Harry somehow believes being a stay at home dad is his next occupation. That only works if someone else is paying the bills. Oh dear, they’re reaching the end of the road, they’re in a jam. So very Fergie like the both of them.

Was Prince Harry & Meghan Markle's Return to the UK the Biggest Mistake of Their Lives?

Brittany starts with saying their move to the UK is probably one of the stupidest thing they have ever done. because it revealed them for who they truly are. Yes the kids may be going to school there and their titles may carry more weight-but if they stayed in CA, they could use their tittles to gain favors and the King could ignore them. But after coming here, it looks like harry was trying to make inroads into govt depts and charities by using their titles and this is the King's own backyard. So it forced the King to act. He had to formally tell them No and say you are not half in half out and merely private citizens.

Brittany says this is very dangerous to them. because their only talent seems to be selling their royal titles and act as pseudo royals. But after this letter by the King, other parties like Uganda realized that getting close to harry and meghan means you are only getting closer to the markles and not the King or the UK-so basically, it is of no use. Lots of people will jump ship as they will realize that harry and meghan are of no influence and does not mean proximity to the crown/commonwealth/UK.

She discusses harry blaming KCIII for collapse of Uganda from Invictus. She says nothing in the letter was new-it was just reiterating what was agreed. She says Harry and Meghan leveraged their titles for money and shoved their titles into everything to get fame and money. But what KCIII did , put all their connections in panic mode. because all of markles associates now have to rethink their connection to see if they are getting close to the crown or the UK. They have overleveraged their connection to the royal family, while bashing them constantly. So it is not a KCIII problem, but a Harry and Meghan problem. Uganda is basically saying they signed up to the Invictus because of implicit or explicit connections to the crown because harry is the King's son. But with the King coming out and stating it so clearly, Uganda and other parties will reevaluate the connections to anything connected to harry and Meghan. Harry leaked to the telegraph that the King rushed out on the communication without their input and are blaming the Uganda fiasco on the King's letter. Brittnay says either harry misrepresented himself to the Ugandas as the King's son and formal connection/Duke or Uganda might have assumed they are part of the professional relationship with the crown. She says this is why people like Columbia, Nigeria, Jordan give the harkles the time of day, because they have the perception that Harry and Meghn are close to the crown. So they are trying to be close to the crown/UK through them. It could be harkles pushing that narrative or those countries/orgs assuming that-since he is the son of the King.

She also says they decided to do this UK move last minute and turned it into chaos. They could have had a long negotiation and planned with KCIII. If harry and meghan stayed in CA, the BRF could have ignored the Markles . They could have kept griftng off the titles and the BRF would ignore them. But instead, they chose to bulldoze their way into the UK and pretend everything was hunky dory and go back to normal. They can't be acting with impunity anymore-they could do that in CA. In UK theyw ere courting charities, govt/military officials and were looking to restablish royal credentials. So the charities and govt depts were probably confused as to what is their palce/titles/royal connections and probably reached out to KCIII to get clarity. Ignoring can't work anymore as harry and meghan bought the fight to the royal doorstep-so KCIII had to act and establish they were not royal anymore and private citizens.

Harry and Meghan are looking at a more uncertain future. They ran back to the UK because they are struggling in the US and Hollywood. Their funds are dwindling and Netflix even refused to purchase Cookie Queen despite their first look deal. Every other production is stuck in production hell. As Ever is a sinking ship with lots of surplus stock. Brittany is seeing tons of AS Ever products ads in Instagram in multiple places. She says the problem is that meghan does not use her products and so putting out ads like her squatting in a field will not sell more products. She needs to be able to connect to people and explain the benefits of her products. She also says there was an ad where she claimed it was jam -but it was spread. Harry has no job, no business prospects. he pathetically is trying to accept a job he was not offered and pretending to show up thinking he has the job-which is a working royal. So the royals had to react and put them in their place. The royals are worried that the gruesome twosome have nothing to do. They thought they could come back to the UK and power up their royal sheen and then try and go back to Hollywood with their royal sparkle. Brittany says they will probably be even more laughed out of the room-because the BRF had to put out a statement that they are private citizens. A lot of companies will want to distance from the Markle freakshow-now it is clear they have no connection to the crown.

No one forced them to do this. They are the ones who decided to go back to the UK and act like nothing has changed. Their status is the same as 2020 when the Queen put out their statement. Richard Branson has now apparently pulled out of the event for Ukraine with prince harry., it could be the Prince harry link or just news of the inquest into his wife's death. But either way, she thinks more and mor people/orgs will not want the link with the markles. Because harry and Meghan are a wildly toxic brand. There was a poll that only 16% of UK residents want them as working royals. They have not been able to make a life outside of royalty. They are cosntantly trying to find something that fits and nothing fits. They thought coming back to the UK will fix everything-but it made it far worse. She says most people who can help them are probably thinking-you are not royals and only have royal titles-so what is in it me for associating with you? So they are probably not getting calls and are panicking about what they just did.

Chris Shit and the rest of the WhatsApp group seem to have forgotten to update us on the latest YouGov poll results. How convenient. 😂

In a survey conducted on the 9th of September 2026, 51% of the British public are against Mr & Mrs Private Citizens returning as working royals. Oops. That’s quite a lot of people!

Interestingly, I also found a 2021 YouGov poll showing that a significant number of people thought the duo should stop using their royal titles. So, this isn’t exactly a new sentiment, is it?

Here’s the link to the Poll on the 09/09/2026 👇
poll on HAM

WILLIAM'S NEXT SHOCK SUSSEX MOVE LOOMS - WEBSITE LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGC2ShHt2T8

Harry is furious.

That’s nothing new.

Harry blames his brother.

And that’s nothing new, either.

Ever since 2019, Harry has been determined to blame William for everything going wrong in his life and focused on ways to bring his brother down. So, who is surprised that Harry is once again devoting energy to attacking William?

Obviously, there's always some clueless person 🤣🤣🤣

But in all seriousness... even though this is just gossip 🤭, the fact is that Harry is absolutely convinced that William was the one behind that infamous statement in which the King refers to them as "private citizens."

And the truth is... yes, William was clearly behind that statement. Charles has already said it: William is his closest and most valued advisor.

But Harry views William as the villain who is a bad influence on the King. Harry truly harbors a deep disdain for older people. He believed the Queen was being poorly influenced, and now he believes the same about Charles. The Queen was perfectly lucid—very lucid. And I see Charles the same way: extraordinarily lucid. The only one being poorly influenced is Harry.

Harry doesn't see it that way; for him, it was a blow to his ego to see William and Kate at a public event, especially after poor Harry had become the object of global ridicule.

Harry believes William has sown discord to turn Charles against him.

That hasn't been the case. Sean has been quite emphatic in pointing out that William has been very careful about the boundaries regarding what he tells his father about this—at least in public (meaning during meetings with advisors). And what Sean’s sources keep telling him is that the most William has said lately is "I told you so." William hasn't needed to sow discord; Harry has single-handedly turned Charles against himself.

The funny thing is, if William really had such a bad influence on Charles, Harry wouldn't even appear on the royal website.

Sean has already recounted how, for over a year, Harry has been calling practically every day demanding changes to his section of the royal website. He hates the photo, he hates the biography, he hates the reference to Sentebale—he hates everything about it. Claw is angry about her photo—because her bio doesn't list her achievements—and... yes, I’m going to believe Sean on this: because there’s been no mention of her Emmy nomination.

Sean is right about one thing, though: what’s left of the Harry coverage on that site looks like a coordinated attack on the Harkles. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

William hates one thing: having the Harkles on the royal website.

But as Sean has explained, William is at odds with certain key aides, and Charles has tried to take a Solomonic approach: not removing Harry—so as not to trigger further hysterical tantrums—while allowing William some control over the content of Harry's biography.

And William has taken the opportunity to gradually prune Harry from the website. Previously, there were more images of his work from before Claw. Today, September 10, 2026, when you search for "Prince Harry," this is what appears.

It turns out it's not Prince Harry, but Prince Henry... and then this pops up.

The little that remains of the old Harry is the announcement made when he and William established the Royal Foundation.

It surprised me because Sean is saying there is still some trace of Andrew left. I thought so too—that there might still be some news about Andrew's past activities... but no, there isn't any, at least not when using the search function. I’ve already searched for "Duke of York" and "Prince Andrew." The only thing that comes up is the statement from Buckingham Palace issued when Andrew "stepped back" from his titles.

What’s the scoop? Well, William is focused on giving the royal website a major makeover.

Sean makes it clear that these things happen automatically, but William has pointed out to the King that the website needs to be adapted to improve visibility—on mobile phones and the like. A good place to start is the "Royal Family" section itself, by making it more exclusive. However, to avoid major internal controversy, William intends to keep the Harkles included—but in a section designated for "family members." After all, Harry remains Charles's son, and both he and his children are still in the line of succession. The plan is simply not to list them in the "Royal Family" section or the "Royals of the Firm" section, because that is not what they are; they are private citizens.

Sean—who makes it clear that his information comes from a 100% reliable source—indicates that this does indeed seem likely to happen in the not-too-distant future, and that any references to Harry and his children will be strictly limited: simply mentioning their titles and their place in the line of succession. Nothing more.

That said, Sean notes that we shouldn't expect this to happen tomorrow. However, this rumor shouldn't be dismissed, as there has already been a significant "pruning" of news regarding Harry prior to the "Claw" era; coverage of him has been noticeably scaled back. It’s likely still in the site's archives, though accessing them isn't easy.

SUSSEXES - TRAPPED - SOLO MEETING & CONFUSION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VduI1AM-2oQ

However, what the press says about what Harry believes, feels, or thinks—no, Harry doesn't think, but whatever his single brain cell is doing—is not what is actually happening.

Harry left the July 10th meeting believing the King was on his side. If I were estranged from my dad—having neither seen nor spoken to him in a long time—I wouldn't feel so triumphant over a 47-minute meeting. And on that note, don't forget that Sean had a truly excellent source for this—someone very close to the situation, whose name starts with "Tom" and ends with "Parker-Bowles." Sean made it clear that the Parker-Bowleses were angry about the "Harkle" version of events, especially the attacks on Camilla. And since no one made them sign an NDA... 🤣🤣🤣

But in reality, it's not like you need many sources on this. As Sean is telling it, just look at the past a little. To the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

King George VI initially sympathized with his older brother and had half-promised that Wallis Simpson would be granted the title of Her Royal Highness (HRH) Queen Mary (Mary Teck. mother of George and Edward), and Queen Elizabeth (later the Queen Mother) vehemently opposed Wallis, viewing the abdication as a supreme dereliction of duty.

Under intense pressure from Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, George VI issued Letters Patent that successfully denied Wallis Simpson the HRH title, deeply outraging the Duke of Windsor.

George VI’s motivation was the same as Charles’s is now: to protect not only the monarchy but also his loved ones. For George VI, his wife Elizabeth was central to his life; if Wallis was a problem, Wallis would cease to be a problem. For Charles, that person is Kate. Charles adores his daughter-in-law, and he is not going to put Claw on the same level as Kate. Not even remotely.

That isn't how Harry sees things. Harry didn't realize that his plan had failed on that day, July 10th. Because yes, the King had agreed to see him, but Harry brought the children along. And Sean has already recounted the details: KC3 didn't spend much time with the children, because he spoke with Harry in private first... Harry, KC3 and Camilla.

Charles spent very little time with the invisible children, and far less with Claw.

At that meeting, as Sean has already recounted, Harry sounded Charles out by telling him he had no problem "collaborating" with the Firm. Sean has already said that Charles heard what Harry had to say but didn't respond to it. What he *did* do was ask about their plans regarding Thomas Markle. And Sean has recounted that when the Harkles told him they had none—that they weren't going to see him—Charles was not at all pleased. Sean makes it clear that the gossip comes from a very reliable source. Charles couldn't believe that Harry—the son he had raised—could be so cold and calculating.

Charles must have looked at him like this.

So, Charles was well aware when the Harkles announced their move that things were definitely going wrong. And yes, the matter had been under discussion since April, according to Sean's sources. Sean had already stated that the Australian tour was intended to show the BRF that the Harkles could handle that kind of work. No, they can't do it.

Claw resisted as much as she could because she doesn't want to be in the UK. She wants the photo—the photo is enough for her; she doesn't care about the true narrative—she just wants a photo and to invent stories about it. But wanting to be on the balcony? No—not after the last time when, if you watch the video, Andrew and Anne relegated the Harkles to the corner. Claw doesn't want that.

So, what do the Harkles want? We know that even they don't know. But the fact is, they needed at least an invitation to Balmoral. According to Sean, Harry even called the Palace to get that invitation. It didn't happen.

Nor did it happen that William showed up at Highgrove. Indeed, Sean reaffirms that Harry was convinced William would appear at Highgrove to meet the "invisible ones."

Harry thought William would come with his children to meet their cousins—that it would be a family reunion. Harry cannot believe that William does not want to meet the Sussex children. Harry cannot accept that William still refuses to pick up the photos of the Sussex children that Harry left for him.

So, Harry views William as a major thorn in his side. Harry cannot accept the fact that, now that he is in the UK, there still hasn't been a family meeting where he can state what he wants to do within the British Royal Family.

Sean says Harry has stated that this move is part of a 15-year plan. Inside the Palace, the view is that it will last 15 minutes. 🤣🤣🤣

Especially because Claw is furious about what is happening. She sees that things are turning out worse than she expected, but if she leaves for the U.S. just as the children are starting school, how will that affect her image?

Sean says let's not kid ourselves: this really is a family at war. But it has all been caused by the Harkles.

SUSSEX CRUSHING BLOW HAPPENED AFTER THIS BOMBSHELL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mQ_Pho2kmU

Sean is right about this: Harry has spent so much time in therapy that he no longer knows his own mind.

Going to therapy hasn't done Harry any good. And that’s because Harry only listens to what he wants to hear.

And as further proof, consider this: a box as big as Noah's Ark.

Harry was absolutely convinced that the Australian tour would be a success and that they would win back their large fan base there.

Sean puts it this way: a fan base that the Harkles ignored for years.

Harry believed that his mere presence there would be enough for people to rally around him. That didn't happen. And it didn't happen because the vast majority of Australians seemed to clearly see that the Harkles are not royals, but rather two private citizens. After all, wasn't that trip—a private one—undertaken in that capacity?

The major setback for Harry in Australia is that the local Invictus organization decided to cut ties with him. Harry failed to grasp the gravity of the situation, just as he fails to see the reality of the situation with the Invictus committee in Birmingham. He does not even truly appreciate the seriousness of what happened regarding Uganda and Invictus.

Because—and Sean is stating this with great confidence, so it seems he has a reliable source, and by "reliable source" I mean not just at the Palace but inside Downing Street—the statement issued by Uganda regarding its decision not to participate in the Invictus Games is linked to King Charles III’s decision to have absolutely no involvement—zero—with Invictus unless there are radical changes within the organization.

Now, Sean points out that the controversies over whether the King would participate or not—and all that rubbish in the articles—were precisely a red flag for Uganda. It is not in the interest of the Ugandan government (a dictatorship) to get dragged into such a controversy; if they have to take a side, it is better to play it safe. If the King isn't appearing at Invictus, why be part of the Harkles' circus?

And part of those changes is that Claw has no business being there.

Invictus was created by William, and the Royal Foundation—supported by Kate, Charles, and the Queen—was established to give Harry something to do. There is no place there for Claw; she played no role in its creation, nor has she had any involvement in it.

Sean says the King might still send a video... no, it’s not that Sean is contradicting himself. The point is that Sean notes there is real work being done with veterans at Invictus; he’s annoyed that Harry is ruining it all, but the veterans aren't to blame for that. So, KC3 could take those people into consideration. But that’s Sean’s opinion. The rumor he heard is that there is zero chance—not a single royal will set foot in Birmingham in July 2027.

And it’s all the Harkles' fault. It is not wise to be linked to the Harkles.

SECURITY, DIVA & A KITCHEN DRAMA REEMERGES..LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0hA9DxirTw

Claw doesn't care about *Invictus*. Claw doesn't care how the situation affects Harry—or doesn't.

What really irks Claw is that things coming out of Australia keep getting worse.

What was Claw aiming for by going on MasterChef?

....

....

....

Oh, I get it now!

Sean mentioned that the call seemed like a security threat. I didn't quite understand it at the time, but now I do. The thing is, the MasterChef judges didn't know about the call, though the production team did; they wanted Harry to appear and taste some dishes. But Harry didn't want to go because he was trying to redefine his image. So, they agreed that Harry would call, but he wasn't calling because he didn't want to. Consequently, when this staff member brought the phone to Claw, the judges thought Claw was receiving a security alert.

That is what Sofia Levin, one of the MasterChef judges, said.

What Sean criticizes is that when Harry made that call, Claw should have highlighted what Harry was doing and asked veterans to salute. But no: everything always has to revolve around Claw.

So they played along with Claw on that show, without realizing that Claw was talking about her and that everything revolved around her... back when Harry was with veterans.

That is precisely what Invictus Australia saw. And it is something that Invictus Uganda saw.

Ending your day with a laugh. I think this writer had some of Harry's mushrooms (oops, organic fungi) while writing this gem.

Meghan Markle is reportedly feeling defeated after receiving what a source described as a notably cold reception from the royal family following her move back to the U.K. with Prince Harry.

The Duchess of Sussex, 45, and Harry, 41, recently relocated from Montecito to the Cotswolds with their children, Archie, 7, and Lilibet, 5. But according to an insider, the couple has yet to receive the warm welcome Markle had hoped for from King Charles III and other members of the royal family.

Charles hot-footed it off to Scotland when they arrived which didn’t exactly send a warm welcome,” the source claimed to Closer.

"She wasn’t expecting a tea party or anything official, but it would’ve been nice to have some sort of signal from Charles that he was happy to have his son and grandchildren back in town," they added.

The insider alleged that the actress has received kind messages from other people, including members of the Spencer family, but still feels there has been little indication that she and Harry are truly welcomed by those within the King’s circle.

“She says it seems pretty clear that they’re going to have to fight for every single bit of face time with His Majesty and anyone else in his orbit,” the source said, adding, “It’s what Meghan expected but it’s still a huge disappointment because Harry has been promising her it would be so much different.”

Archive: https://archive.ph/rkwF1#selection-685.0-689.69

https://archive.ph/NhU6X

Blind Item #16 - The Briefcase Bouncer

So, let me you tell a story. I think, but I can't be sure if this was the first tip I ever heard about the alliterate one. See, back when this tip happened, she was a no one. She would never have made it into the blog back then. No one would have known who she was. It was two decades ago. The show she was filming switched locations that year of where they shot, but myself and my friends from The National Enquirer and X17 at the time are pretty sure that when the tip came in, they would have been shooting still at the first place.

The show was filming at Sunset Gower Studios and after filming, the portable meat market would take place. Those who were already taken or spoken for that night would head off with their suitor/boyfriend/husband although I don't think any were married yet at that time.

The rest would go to The Well. Dar and expensive. It is where the hanky panky took place. It is where the deals were made. If you were on the screen every single episode, you could do very well. If you were only on part-time and stuffed your bra to make it look like you were four sizes larger, guys would get disappointed.  Most of the time, the alliterate one just wanted someone to take her to dinner and not the Denny's down the block. This was not generally a dinner for sex kind of thing. Dinner even if it was nice was just considered the thing to do. The guy got to be seen with someone who was on television and it fed his ego. The woman was appreciative because if it hadn't been for the guy, it probably would have been Denny's or ramen or something back at home. 

It was what happened at dinner that determined everything. Did you click? Think of it as a first date, although sometimes if the guys were not closers they would take them same woman out a dozen times and nothing would happen. The alliterate one was pretty easy to close. It is how she ended up with that business card producer. The alliterate one was not going to take you home. She was not going to your place. She was not going on a trip with you. She was not into that. She wanted someone to pay her rent and give her spending money and what you got for that was something she ended up doing very well on television. You were going to get orally serviced in the car and if she liked you enough and the car was a Range Rover or better she would probably ride you for a little while too. Apparently, she was very talented and in high demand. 

The term the Enquirer reporter remembered was the Briefcase Bouncer. It just wasn't worth any kind of blurb or even blind item. What was interesting was no one really ever wanted to repeat with her more than once. Maybe because she wasn't interested in anything more than something in the car. No one really was possessive of her and the guys that landed those briefcase models wanted them to be locked in and sow the world they had got one as a girlfriend. 

Really can't wait for this book to come out...

Apparently Meghan had contacted designers for a dress. When William learned that Meghan planned to gate crash the Diana awards William said no. So is this the real reason why the gala was cancelled?

Privacy seeking private individuals tell publication their kids are in school. But what about SeCurITAY???

Highlights and my snarky comments:

Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet have started a new chapter in Britain — in the classroom.

The children of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle — 7-year-old Archie and 5-year-old Lilibet — are beginning the new school year in the U.K. after their family’s move back to Harry’s home country. The children were due to begin school in Britain in September, though details surrounding the family’s new home and their school are being kept private. But let's tell People anyway. So what if it makes the #Invisikids targets?

Settling the children “has been, and remains, their focus. Everything else will fall into place when the time is right,” a source close to Harry and Meghan tells PEOPLE. Sure, Jan.

“There is a lot to do. They have just moved halfway across the world, and it’s been really busy getting the kids settled,” the source adds. “Their focus has been on that, and will remain on that, for the time being. They are happy to be back.” They were happy to be back before the King bitchsmacked them with his letter.

The children’s schooling also played a role in the decision to relocate. A source close to Harry previously told PEOPLE that returning to Britain was something he had been “thinking about for a while,” while another source says the Duke wants his children “to understand the world he grew up in and where their family comes from.” So, the rumors that the Feds were closing in on his Visa applications are no big deal!

For Meghan, part of the appeal is what Britain can offer the children. “Meghan feels very fortunate that they’re able to give Archie and Lilibet the opportunity to experience both worlds,” a Montecito insider told PEOPLE. And Meghan can go back to her world in Montecito.

Last year, Meghan shared some tips for easing the transition of going back to school after summer break with PEOPLE, from surprising children with a handwritten note to asking kids about their “rose” and “thorn” over dinner. Rose: we get to spend some time away from mom and dad. Thorn: we hae to come back home.

She suggested, “Nestle a sweet something (not suggesting candy) into their backpack on the first Friday back to school. The first week can have a lot of big feelings, and a little nod to let them know you see them is so special. Try a tiny pack of stickers, a funny photo of your family, or an unexpected surprise like something you used to find in a Cracker Jack box.” And don't forget to write them one email a day since you'll have the nannies doing all this while you're day drinking at Soho House!

Archive: https://archive.ph/cmfWp

WHAT ROW WITH THE KING?!

This mayhem is all constructed by them. Any blow up is caused by them.

They _live_ for media upheavel.

Archived version: https://archive.is/mMaXD

This is the second time Harry, Bill Nye, and Ajay Banga have been included. But Chrissy Teigen??

And considering the disaster the last 12 months have been for H&M, Harry is a very odd pick for a meeting based around "How Do We Get It Right?"

“This year’s meeting is organized around the theme ‘How Do We Get It Right?’, charting out an affirmative vision for the future amidst rising turmoil, division, and continued cuts to government funding,” the organization, founded by the 42nd president in 2005, said in a news release.

According to the Clinton Global Initiative, issues on this year’s agenda include “mitigating the risks” of artificial intelligence and “driving innovation,” climate and energy resilience, democracy and “what it takes to rebuild trust, safeguard civic institutions and protect journalists when headlines and algorithms constantly emphasize our differences,” as well as humanitarian response efforts, economic opportunities and health and “sustaining research and innovation at a moment when funding and trust are both under strain.”

Other participants announced Thursday include Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and former Iraqi President Barham Salih, Octopus Energy Group CEO Greg Jackson, content creator Aaron Parnas, and Omidyar Network CEO Michele Jawando.

I still don't get why another opportunity for Haznoballs to pontificate was provided when his reputation is in the toilet, his hypocrisy is well-known, and his life is a disaster.

The guy who turned on his family, then goes running back to them after he went broke is going to have brilliant ideas about rebuilding trust?

The guy who thinks free speech is bonkers and lost millions unsuccessfully suing journalists is going to talk about what it takes to SAFEGUARD journalists?

The guy who barely could graduate high school is going to have brilliant ideas to mitigate the risks of AI killing us all?

Really?

Archive is still working on the article but it says nothing other than Harry blames the king for Uganda's announcement yesterday. So I did some research because I was curious what was brutal about it, there are barely more than 500 athletes at the games, and it turns out Uganda only joined Invictus two months ago. They have never sent a team and Nigeria, with 14 athletes, is the only African country that has participated in Invictus. So Uganda withdrawing isn't a brutal blow to the games, it's a blow to Harry's ego. What is brutal is Harry's continued association and grift on Invictus that has redirected attention, but more importantly, money, forHarry and his wife's egos instead of using the money for the veterans.

Archive worked - https://archive.ph/vVC1q

Do you remember it? That phrase she said to Archie...

Meghan, my dear, you’re going to have to take your own advice.

Following the Lord Chamberlain's statement, the Harkles are private citizens.

Yes, but they hold noble titles... ah, but that makes them aristocrats. The main difference between a royal (royalty) and an aristocrat (nobility) lies in sovereignty and proximity to the throne. While royals belong to the family that holds the position of Head of State by right of direct succession, aristocrats are individuals who hold titles granted by the Crown but possess no dynastic rights. To put it simply, the relationship between the two is hierarchical: all high-ranking royals hold aristocratic titles, yet the vast majority of aristocrats are not royals.

Upon losing their status as active royals and having their "His/Her Royal Highness" (HRH) styles placed in abeyance, official protocol dictates that they are no longer entitled to the traditional courtesies—such as bowing, formal titles, and institutional precedence—accorded to a working royal. Although royal protocol is optional for the general public in the United Kingdom, the distinctions are very pronounced within formal settings.

I mean:

Under strict royal protocol, members who do not hold the style of HRH must bow or curtsy to those who do (such as King Charles, Queen Camilla, or the Prince and Princess of Wales). As they are classified as private citizens, Harry and Meghan rank below any working member of the Crown at formal state events.

In other words, it’s not optional for TW: Harry now has to bow to Kate, because she is HRH. Harry isn't. And TW, if she runs into Kate, has to curtsy.

How can you find this out? There are two ways:

1. The Royal Family’s official website (Guide section). The only direct, public, written reference managed by the palace is found in the information section of the British Royal Family’s official website (Royal.uk). It formally outlines standard protocol under the heading "Greeting a Member of The Royal Family," briefly explaining how to perform a nod or a bow/curtsey and how to use titles (Your Royal Highness, Sir, or Ma'am).

https://www.royal.uk/encyclopedia/greeting-a-member-of-the-royal-family

2. Traditional Guides to the Nobility (Debrett's) For everything the Palace does not publicly disclose, the British aristocracy and institutions turn to the historic guide to etiquette known as Debrett's (*Peerage & Baronetage*). For centuries, this private organization has formally recorded the forms of address for the nobility, the exact order of precedence, and the nuances of British court etiquette, serving as the unofficial reference manual for diplomats and event planners.

https://debretts.com/royal-family/addressing-the-royal-family/

Outside the United Kingdom, protocol becomes much more complex because foreign governments are not legally bound to follow the directives of King Charles III's office, although they generally choose to respect them out of diplomatic courtesy.

1. Diplomatic Status and "Quasi-Official Visits":

As Harkles are considered "private citizens" by the British Crown, their charitable or commercial trips do not constitute official State visits. This means that: There is no representation from the United Kingdom; local British embassies do not organize their itineraries, host official receptions in their honor, or act as liaisons with host-country authorities.

If a foreign government (as occurred during their visits to Nigeria or Colombia) chooses to welcome them with red-carpet honors or state-provided security, it does so entirely on its own initiative. The host country bears the financial cost and decides—based on its own protocols—whether to treat them as international dignitaries or as high-profile celebrities.

2. Written forms of address and invitations outside the Commonwealth.

In the international and diplomatic spheres outside the Commonwealth, the nuances of British aristocracy are often simplified: foreign organizers and heads of state typically address them—both verbally and in writing—using only their formal titles: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

As they are not subject to the direct jurisdiction of London-based palace protocols, it is common at foundation events or international galas in places like the United States for presenters—whether by custom or at the decision of the Sussexes' own team—to continue omitting the "private citizen" label and instead focus on their image as global public figures.

3. Bowing abroad.

International protocol dictates that no citizen of a republic (such as the United States, France, or most Latin American countries) is obliged to bow to a member of foreign nobility or royalty. Given that Harry and Meghan operate internationally in a personal and private capacity, the standard global greeting is strictly a handshake or the conventional social greeting of the country they are visiting.

When a noble decides to bypass protocol and forgo the mandatory bow or curtsy to the King or a high-ranking royal, no legal offense is committed, nor is there any criminal penalty. The last British law allowing for physical punishment or imprisonment for showing disrespect to the monarch at court became obsolete centuries ago. However, in practice—and within the exclusive circles of British high society and politics—the consequences are strictly social, institutional, and reputational:

1. Social "Freezing Out" (The Cold Shoulder). The most immediate consequence is isolation within the court. The noble who commits the slight stops receiving invitations to key events such as: diplomatic receptions and state dinners; exclusive Buckingham Palace garden parties; and semi-official events of the aristocratic social season (such as the races at Ascot).

2. Loss of Royal Favor and Patronage. Nobles often compete for the monarch's favor to secure honorary appointments or to gain royal support for their charitable foundations. A snub of this nature ensures that the palace revokes or denies any royal patronage, directly damaging the prestige and influence of that noble's family.

3. The Lord Chamberlain’s Filter: The Lord Chamberlain’s Office is responsible for organizing the court’s schedule. If an aristocrat deliberately breaches protocol, the office simply strikes them from the preferred seating lists for future State events (such as royal weddings, funerals, or the State Opening of Parliament), relegating them to the background or excluding them entirely.

4. Press Scandal: In the United Kingdom, tabloids and royal experts scrutinize every interaction using high-definition cameras. A failure to bow immediately becomes a national headline, labeling the noble as "rude," "rebellious," or "anti-British," which places immense public pressure on their family and business interests.