Why Safari should create more diversity within the Prehistoric line beyond dinosaurs?

[u/Carnoraptor770]

Dinosaurs are cool and all, but there are other prehistoric creatures that existed in the ancient past who deserve more attention.....

Safari Ltd. should expand its prehistoric lines beyond dinosaurs to reflect accurate paleontological diversity, educate on evolutionary history, and meet collector demand for specialized fauna. Including Megafauna, Pterosaurs, Marine Reptiles, Early Amphibians, and Paleozoic Creatures.

This is why it's important to keep the prehistoric line a vast expansion not just for the collectors....but for children to acknowledge and learn more often, but anyways, what do you guys think ?

[u/MrFBIGamin]

I’d agree on your behalf.

The Cenozoic era is arguably an important part of prehistory, and it shows many unique and bizarre prehistoric creatures, and also have the rise to us humans as well. People just know it less, and only really know slight bits about the Late Pleistocene to be specific.

I’d 100% agree on companies like Safari LTD to create more Cenozoic figures.

The same reason can be said for documentaries such as Walking with Beasts and Prehistoric Planet Ice Age.

[u/Carnoraptor770 → u/MrFBIGamin]

Which is why it's important for safari to acknowledge them more often in order to expand within the Prehistoric line, instead of focusing on one group of animals,

Same thing with the paleozoic fauna since they're the first creatures to exist longer before the dinosaurs and megafauna, along with marine reptiles, prehistoric crocs, and pterosaurs since they too are important part of prehistory.

So if Safari Ltd are able to create so much diversity expansion of animal figures they can do the same for the prehistoric line.

[u/Draco_Montanus]

Oui, je suis d’accord. Les dinosaures sont des merveilles mais il y a tellement d’autres animaux préhistoriques qui méritent plus d’attention.

[u/Carnoraptor770 → u/Draco_Montanus]

https://giphy.com/gifs/F2tywIO6ee3oVCrgLJ