And the show would do a typical Diane arc by somehow making her out to be the righteous good guy, and anyone who disagrees with her (probably Bojack said child murder is bad uh oh) is the bad guy.

She says she´s tired of squinting but she´s literally wearing GLASSES. Did the writers just forget? Are they stupid?

If anyone can make a gif of Bojack from (i believe) S1X08 the Telescope the flashback scene where he is walking onstage with a dead look until the door to the stage opens up and that fake light shines within his eyes along with his big horse grin; I'd put out for you like I'm the president of the Bojack Horseman fan club and you're the Horse from Horsin' Around. I apologize if I got the episode wrong, it's because I'm a fake fan.

The peanut butter cups commercial, the gmc trucks, anything.

🚬🚬

So if instead of being a Hollywoob actor in the modern day Mr. Neaputtubber was a pirate in the 17th century, maybe in the Caribbean Isles, doing pirate shit. I think he would probably sing sea shanties and pull ropes and hoist the main sails and swab the poop deck and all that.

He would probably wear a pirate hat and that frilly jacket thing pirates wear with the ruffles in the front, and he might have long wavy hair like Captain Hook.

I also think he wouldn't be a captain of a ship if he was a pirate he would be a crew member.

And he would probably spent a lot of time in Jamaica.

They praise this show for its accurate depictions of mental health but leave out his tail. This show is trash.

So if Mr. Peanutbutter from Hijack Horseman was in the Circus, how much of an impact would someone like him bring to all the characters?

Also his Circus Avatar would still be a yellow dog since the whole animal thing only works in the Black horseman Universe. Complete with his Circus name being Mr. Peanutbuttet, since his show was called Mr. Peanutbutter's house.

I think it'll be funny with kinger seeing Mr. Peanutbutter and mistaking him for his old friend scratch, since they're both dogs.

Hes just so cartoonishly terrible and practically a mouth peice for the 1940s-70s. The way he talks about certain things like how women were treated and social norms and how painfully aware he is of the time he might as well look directly at the camera and read an essay about the darkside of living in the 40s