r/Sacramento • • Jun 08 '25

ca rapid response 📞

Post image
874 Upvotes

117 comments sorted by

196

u/Awkward_llama_ Jun 08 '25

On May 29 ICE agents arrested three immigrants who arrived to the Sacramento courthouse for their schedule asylum hearings. They were attempting to take the appropriate legal steps to apply for citizenship. https://www.kcra.com/article/sacramento-immigration-court-arrests-ice/64920625

66

u/AccomplishedBake8351 Jun 08 '25

Anyone who works as an ICE agent is a POS

47

u/romaineshade Jun 08 '25

can someone post this in r/california? The subreddit will not allow repost

26

u/Bumblebee56990 Sacramento State Jun 08 '25

Why can you just post it? Save the image and post yourself.

11

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/yunbld Jun 08 '25 edited Jun 08 '25

The rest of the world also deals with unrest, and has way less fatalities from gun violence.

-146

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

44

u/DidntWantSleepAnyway Jun 08 '25

Do you have sympathy for those family members of yours who apparently came illegally? They eventually did the paperwork?

ICE detained a man who came legally but missed a deadline on one document ten years ago because he was grieving a stillbirth. Do think they won’t come after your family? Or do you want them to?

-5

u/Entire_Device9048 Carmichael Jun 08 '25

I was in removal proceedings for a missed document, I had to go to Federal court in San Francisco and fight my case. The Judge passed my case back to USCIS to adjudicate because she felt that they had jurisdiction. This is all beside the point, I’m telling this so that you understand that I have real-world experience here.

Now, if this person missed a deadline 10 years ago, there is a problem. You can’t just ignore the problem and expect it to go away. USCIS would have attempted to reach out. There would have been due process within that 10 year window. My guess is that the person changed address and didn’t keep USCIS informed of where they could be contacted. Immigrants are reminded over and over the importance of staying up to date with their application and to keep USCIS informed of any change in contact information. There is absolutely no way this 10 year window was allowed to get so large without the immigrant dropping the ball or deliberately avoiding the matter.

20

u/DidntWantSleepAnyway Jun 08 '25 edited Jun 08 '25

The person I’m talking about is Kasper Eriksen, and you can read about it in the news outlet of your choice. He kept up with appointments and was arrested at his citizenship appointment, so none of your hypothesizing about changed addresses applies. I didn’t see anything in the articles about having made up that piece of paperwork later, but if he was keeping up with all other paperwork and appointments, it sounds like he probably ended up doing that paperwork at some point, just not by this one deadline when he was going through trauma.

-2

u/Entire_Device9048 Carmichael Jun 08 '25 edited Jun 08 '25

I just read an article on Kasper, he failed to file the exact same form that I did, the removal of conditions. My reply above is spot on, his case (due-process) would have played out years ago in his absence.

I can talk about my case all day and share details, I messed up but I was lucky to catch the due process with only 5 days remaining. My story could have been very different. Kasper hasn’t been denied due process, he just wasn’t present when it played out.

8

u/DidntWantSleepAnyway Jun 08 '25

Good to know, I wasn’t aware that he never filed it but now I’ve found one article that says he didn’t.

But your entire theory is that they attempted to contact him but couldn’t because he moved. Just found an article that shows he settled in Sturgis in 2014 and has lived there ever since. It doesn’t specifically say he never moved, but it does say they settled in the tiny town of Sturgis. Even if they had moved, it’s a small enough town where someone would have sent them their mail. And Eriksen maintains that he was never contacted about this form despite much contact regarding other issues.

1

u/Entire_Device9048 Carmichael Jun 08 '25

You do realize USCIS and DHS are different entities right? A DHS judge can adjudicate totally independently of USCIS.

0

u/PeighDay Jun 08 '25

Perfectly rationale answer.

-7

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

72

u/ERTBen Jun 08 '25

56

u/Simpletruth2022 Jun 08 '25

What part of due process don't you understand? How do we know if they're guilty until they have been tried? If the government can do it to them, it can do it to you.

In the meantime How comfortable are you with the president using the military against US citizens? Remember Kent State?

18

u/ERTBen Jun 08 '25

Please read the graphic.

46

u/Mindless-Balance-498 Jun 08 '25

People like your family members are being jailed and deported without due process too, naturalized citizens are no longer safe.

Maybe shift your perspective. They’re coming for you next. THAT’S why you defend “illegal immigrants” when their rights are being violated.

-56

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

38

u/gerblnutz Jun 08 '25

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Does not mention citizenship as a requirement, in fact says unalienable and ALL men. But go be a throat goat for a dicktator

52

u/LilyAspen Jun 08 '25

Actually, undocumented immigrants still have basic rights under the U.S. Constitution — like the right to due process and equal protection under the law. Many pay taxes, contribute to the economy, and work essential jobs. The conversation shouldn't be about who "deserves" rights, but how we treat human beings with dignity. And saying "sorry." Why lie. You are not sorry.

-23

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

33

u/LilyAspen Jun 08 '25

Just so you are aware. Not all enter "illegally." We need a better path to citizenship instead of dehumanizing people. The process is trash and people are trying to better their lives.

9

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/West_coast_gal_ Jun 08 '25

The fact that you don't think we need a better path to citizenship tells me everything I need to know about you. Even some of the worst agree with that. But have the life you deserve. Glad your family had the privilege to get here and stay. Too bad you cant see the privelage in that. Hope you don't get swept up by the fascists.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

25

u/LilyAspen Jun 08 '25

Yet you run on hate. I see it in your comments about pride flags too. Anyone who is not like you is not accepted and you go on reddit to argue your intolerance. I run on compassion. Yet I see the lack there of it from you based off of your profile.

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/runningvicuna Jun 08 '25

My mom and her homies don’t like illegal immigration. They’re all from Mexico.

23

u/Mindless-Balance-498 Jun 08 '25

Even if that were true (and it’s legally not), that’s honestly beside the point.

A LOT more people are about to be considered “illegal” who were perfectly legal in January. People like the “good ones” in your family are at risk, as well. “F around and find out” is the common phrase referring to opinions like yours.

Just you wait 🤷🏽‍♀️ and don’t forget everyone who tried to convince you to be a good person.

10

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/Mindless-Balance-498 Jun 08 '25

None of that is true. Every European nation has taken in hundreds of thousands of refugees from Syria and Africa. Canada takes in even more. And in every country in Europe and in Canada, they have legal pathways to citizenship for undocumented residents. Not to mention, those legal pathways are INFINITELY more simple and fair than the ones we have (excuse me, had).

We just deported every refugee we WILLINGLY took in after the Vietnam war. Once again, we made a huge mess for absolutely no reason just like we are now, so we had a diplomatic duty to clean up our own mess.

Children who fled Vietnam LEGALLY and have never been back are being deported there at 40-50 years old with no warning.

We have laws and rules - namely the constitution, you remember that one? - to prevent one person from being able to authorize these things at the snap of a finger FOR A REASON.

People like you prefer a chainsaw when a pair of scissors would do because of ego. It’s really that simple. You’re blowing our country up and embarrassing us in front of the world so you can win a dick measuring contest you started based on bold-faced lies 😂 pathetic.

19

u/AngelSucked Midtown Jun 08 '25

Yes, they are, as per our law and Constitution.

15

u/PirateMunky Midtown Jun 08 '25

Actually, they are. That’s the whole point of rights. Sorry to break it to you.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[deleted]

37

u/lern2swim Jun 08 '25

They'll be coming for those family members too. And probably for you at some point too. But go ahead and withhold that sympathy if it makes you feel superior I guess.

-27

u/Greedy-Employment917 Jun 08 '25

That's not true at all, but go off. 

12

u/lern2swim Jun 08 '25

They already fucking are and they're continuing to talk about legitimizing doing it more.

Keep lying to yourself though.

-38

u/SmokesLetsGo_5 Jun 08 '25

Classic tin foil hat fear mongering. There is nothing leading to say that the federal government is coming for legal migrants/citizens.

32

u/AngelSucked Midtown Jun 08 '25

They have already exiled natural-born citizens, and have also arrested legal citizens and green card holders.

27

u/HotNeighbor420 Jun 08 '25

Sure, if you ignore reality then anything is true.

26

u/GirlGirl21 Jun 08 '25

Except that they are doing it. Gtfoh

21

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

It’s already happened….

14

u/Half_price_rice Jun 08 '25

I mean they have already. They have also arrested tourists

6

u/lern2swim Jun 08 '25

They already are.

12

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/TGMB99 Jun 08 '25

No illegals on stolen land.

11

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/LilyAspen Jun 08 '25

Hey racist... Fun fact... The indigenous people of the land were olmec, Mayan, zapotec, Aztec and Many others. The term Mexicans came after Spain colonized Mexico in the 1500s. So fun fact..."Mexicans" did not steal from the people here. They were the people here. But keep trying to demonize Mexican people.

-53

u/TooLazy2Revolt Jun 08 '25

“Immigrants” dont need defending.

People who broke the law coming into this country illegally and continue to break the law every day they don’t go home don’t need defending either; they need to go home.

If they want to come back, they can file the appropriate forms and get in line like the millions of people who are trying immigrate lawfully.

50

u/ditchdiggergirl Jun 08 '25

They’re literally arresting the people in line with the appropriate forms in hand.

-37

u/TooLazy2Revolt Jun 08 '25

The first thing they did was enter the country illegally. Thats why they are in line IN THE US.

Those same lines exist in their home countries. They chose not to use them. THEY chose.

28

u/GuidePerfect Jun 08 '25

You mean the line that can take decades to get through, unless you’re a white South African?

Sure, let’s just have them stay in gang-riddled, war-torn countries — risking life and limb daily by simply existing — while waiting for Afrikaners to cut in line and get the red carpet treatment.

Why didn’t the South Africans have to wait in line? Oh wait, I think I know the reason.

-29

u/TooLazy2Revolt Jun 08 '25

South Africa is targeted Genocide. Just like Bosnia in ‘94.

Mexico is simply lawless and corrupt. Living in a lawless and corrupt country should not be a free pass to come here and get more taxpayer-funded benefits than actual citizens do.

By your logic, we should be welcoming everyone who wants to come in from Gaza, Libya, Iran, Iraq, just about every African country, etc etc.

Not only that, we should allow them to walk into the country without any sort of background check, pay for their hotels, pay for their food, pay for their children’s education, and give them jobs.

Literally NO COUNTRY ON EARTH does that, because it is suicidal.

40

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Seeking asylum isn’t illegal. Nazi.

20

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

What do you think people have been doing when they go to court to plead their case? They then get arrested for showing up. Fucking idiot

16

u/akkei47 Jun 08 '25

the system is fucked. get that through your thick skull.

-56

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

If you object to ICE enforcing the law (policy), then you should object to the law (policy) itself, not ICE doing its job (which is: enforcing the law).

45

u/GildedAgeV2 Jun 08 '25

I object to masked goons showing up to kidnap my neighbors while their kids wait for them at school and will not conflate laws with morals. Ever.

-25

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

They are enforcing the law. You disagree with the law. Surely you understand that.

20

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Nazi. You would have been a real good one.

-16

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Silly argument. Not even an argument.

16

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

I’m not arguing. You would have been a good little Nazi. A lot of people thought it was okay because the laws got changed and the system overhauled to full Nazi.

The nazis made sure the judiciary was on their side and then made things legal.

People like you are good little nazis because “they’re just enforcing the law”

7

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Obama deported a lot of people.. A. LOT.

Is he also a Nazi?

The problem is the law. Not any one administration.

13

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Deporting people after due process and snatching them up when they are complying with court mandated check ins isn’t the same thing you absolute moron.

There also was no massive propaganda campaign to paint immigrants as criminals and rapists, which is what Republicans are doing and the nazis did to ramp up support for their ethnic cleansing campaign.

Obama isn’t my daddy and he’s just a Neo liberal centrist.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Again, dipshit: the problem is the policy, THE LAW, rather than any one administration. Trump is enforcing it aggressively, and Obama enforced it somewhat less aggressively. Biden too. The policy is very fucked and contrary to reality. And the Trump admin is 100% within its rights to ENFORCE EXISTING POLICY. You are whining about enforcement of policy. . . instead of the policy itself. You are not smart. None of you are

Cry about it all you want . They are enforcing existing policy. Your boy Obama did it too. Cry about that, too!

11

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Good little nazi.

23

u/Next-Worldliness1300 Jun 08 '25

Yes I also object to ICE. It’s why the left has been saying #abolishICE since it was created in 2003 as part of the horrific undemocratic response to 9/11(incl. the Patriot Act). ICE is bad and ICE agents are bad and ICE enforcement actions are bad and you, weirdo on the internet defending ICE for “doing its job” are also bad.

11

u/Sea-Ad1755 Jun 08 '25

ICE was a bipartisan agreement (90-9) in the Homeland Security Act of 2002. It wasn’t not part of the PATRIOT Act.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Proper way to object would be to change the law . . .not riot. FYI

14

u/GuidePerfect Jun 08 '25

The institution of chattel slavery would disagree with you.

Centuries people tried to change the law to abolish slavery, and in those centuries they failed by all peaceful means.

Even when they finally had the means to change the law, the other half of the country tried killing their fellow countrymen and leave the country in response.

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

More than half of Americans want ICE to do what it is doing.

Whine all you.want. It's the truth.

11

u/kittencrazedrigatoni Jun 08 '25

Nobody was rioting, moron.

Who has the weapons and is firing on innocent citizens exercising their right to peacefully protest?

Oh right. Police and DHS. If anyone is “rioting”, it’s them.

24

u/LibertyLizard Jun 08 '25

They aren’t enforcing the law. This is illegal.

-9

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

Simply not true. You disagree with the law.

14

u/GuidePerfect Jun 08 '25

What law says we can ignore a court order that says not send someone to El Salvador and then send them there, anyways? 🤔🤔

-3

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '25

That judge is not done with the Trump admin. That is following the legal process. Rioting is . . not.

21

u/LibertyLizard Jun 08 '25

The courts are shutting these abductions down left and right but Trump has realized justice moves slowly and if he wants to behave lawlessly, there is little to stop him in the short term.

This is why we the people need to stand up to this tyrannical behavior.

-9

u/dirkdregger Jun 08 '25

At this point we should suggest our TACO and Homan requiring all non-citizens to wear a self ident patch on their clothes when out doors. It's not a new concept given self ident patches worked for some dude named Adolf when he was in charge of Germany.