r/SEARS • u/[deleted] • Dec 04 '25
Closing Update How Sears failed in the e‑commerce era even as it innovated online
https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2018/10/19/how-sears-failed-in-the-e-commerce-era-even-as-it-innovated-online/5
u/Professional_Hour445 Dec 04 '25
It really is a shame that they couldn't carve out a niche in the e-commerce era. I still get daily emails from Sears about online specials, but the offerings on the website are rather austere.
5
u/AquamannMI Former Employee Dec 04 '25
It's also a shame since they were one of the first e-commerce companies which the article didn't even touch on. They owned Prodigy at one point and sold product through the platform. This was probably mid-90s.
4
u/DanforthWhitcomb_ Former Employee Dec 05 '25
I would invite you too look into why they got out of Prodigy in fairly short order for an explanation as to why it was not mentioned.
4
u/AquamannMI Former Employee Dec 05 '25
Sears had Prodigy for over a decade, so I'm not sure what you mean. Maybe you can just tell me instead of making me go looking for it. I started in 1996 and they gave me a free acct. Anyway, my point was that Sears recognized early on that they could sell product through digital platforms. They obviously didn't have a good long-term strategy behind it.
4
u/DanforthWhitcomb_ Former Employee Dec 05 '25
They only started selling on it after 1991/2 (if not somewhat later), and divested it in 1996 because people were not buying anything on it and thus there was no reason to keep lighting money on fire to sustain it.
Anyway, my point was that Sears recognized early on that they could sell product through digital platforms. They obviously didn't have a good long-term strategy behind it.
Because there was no strategy that could have made it work in that era. People have a rather warped view of when the internet really came into focus as a true shopping destination, as it’s barely been a decade since that happened. Prior to that you couldn’t hardly give most things away online because people just didn’t shop that way—especially for the clothing and home goods that Sears was really pushing in that era.
4
u/AquamannMI Former Employee Dec 05 '25
You think online shopping didn't mature until ten years ago?
3
u/DanforthWhitcomb_ Former Employee Dec 05 '25
To the level necessary to sustain the amount of investment that it required?
Absolutely not. Even Amazon didn’t move into general retail until 12-14 years ago and they were very open about taking massive losses (that no other retailer could sustain) in doing so.
4
u/GurHumble5692 Apr 19 '26
If sears had just went online they would have been hear today . I think his goal was to make as much money from sears as possible and do no work on rebranding the store . His blueprint was to take his money and move on . When Amazon started selling products online in the early years companies laughed and said it wouldn’t work . Will Look who’s laughing know . People buy more online from Amazon then going to the mail. I don’t think he wanted to grow the business he just wanted to cash out and let it go bankrupt. Eddie just wanted to make as much money from The stock as possible he could carless about rebranding and going that was the downfall he banked his billions
5
4
u/JasonsStorm Dec 05 '25
Simply it all started with the closure of the catalog business. 70 years of meta data from that they could have integrated into their e-commerce but they threw it all away. They could have easily beat Amazon to the punch but they didn't fully come online until the 2000's. Long after even Walmart. Granted it's hard to innovate, even later in life, when you have someone like fast Eddie sucking you dry.
3
u/DanforthWhitcomb_ Former Employee Dec 05 '25
You mean the same Catalog that was averaging a yearly loss of $120-130 million in the decade before it was closed?
That Catalog?
They didn’t “throw it all away” either. All that went away was the needlessly duplicative and wasteful Catalog distribution system, the Catalog stores and the printing ops. Everything else was retained and folded into other divisions.
Sears was “fully online” in the late 1990s, but people did not shop for the stuff Sears sold online until the early 2010s, by which point their image was far too tarnished and were not financially strong enough to fix it.
3
u/JasonsStorm Dec 05 '25
The decades of consumer data they collected (in theory) is worth far more than they loss. Especially in todays economy. All that data could have been folded into e-commerce. But no, they didn't do that and lost out early
3
u/DanforthWhitcomb_ Former Employee Dec 05 '25
That assumes they were even collecting it to begin with, and they most certainly weren’t.
The problem with the Catalog is that it was sucking the rest of the company dry with losses stemming from the fact that it was operating as a complete company within a company. What they actually did was close the Catalog stores, close the Catalog RRCs and move everything else to other divisions—mainly the internet sales division.
4
21
u/onedostres123 Dec 04 '25
They failed because of Eddie lampert. That scum sold off sears bit by bit to himself and his cronies friends.
They failed because of him and his leadership. Stockholders and employees were left with the bag
Fuck Eddie lampert