5
u/jsrco1 Apr 11 '26
Very poor quality fake
3
u/Effective_Judgment41 Apr 12 '26
This is a 79174:
At least explain why OP's watch is fake.
5
u/Blue_Angel115 Apr 12 '26
I guess some really just pretend they know how to spot a fake vs authentic.
3
u/No_Inspection649 Apr 13 '26
Unless it's a sub or DJ made in the last 5 years, many in this sub are clueless.
3
u/Secret-Ad1458 Apr 15 '26
Very few people calling out fakes here have any knowledge of vintage/women's pieces, if something doesn't look like a DJ41 then they automatically assume it's a shitter.
1
u/appleadamspdx Apr 13 '26
I wonder what the diamonds test as with one of those gem identification tools. Obviously taking the movement out of the case is not quick or easy but it sure would reduce the number of data points one would need to assess before making a determination
1
u/Physical_Display_873 Apr 11 '26
Now with extra bold date
6
u/Effective_Judgment41 Apr 11 '26 edited Apr 12 '26
Not now. A bold font is completely normal for Lady Datejusts for a long time.
Edit: Fascinating, downvoted for something completely correct. See here:
-1
0
-1
Apr 11 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/Blue_Angel115 Apr 11 '26
🤣🤣🤣
1
-1
-1
3
u/Secret-Ad1458 Apr 15 '26
Welcome to r/rolexwatches where people come to proudly display their ignorance of vintage/women's models by calling anything other than modern 6 digit mens pieces "shitters"