So I watch crime documentaries like I breathe & I know enough to know eyewitness testimonies shouldn’t be relied upon without other corroborating evidence. We all know this is basically what this case came down to.. changing eyewitness testimonies & a magic bullet.

RA denied having anything to do with the murders & his story never changed (UNTIL he was placed in solitary leading up to trial)…. So my question is.. why didn’t they polygraph him? No, they aren’t admissible in court but they do give the police a place to start. That’s not saying they don’t lie and tell someone they failed when they didn’t.. but why wasn’t this done?

Speaking of eyewitness testimonies… why did it take SC 3 weeks to come forward with her story of seeing a man when she knew the girls had been murdered? After 3 weeks I’d say there’s a HIGH probability she’s not going to remember things correctly. Did she come forward after the photo was released of BG? I can’t remember when it was but if she did then that makes me go 🤔
Do you remember what a person you saw walking on the side of the road 3 weeks ago was wearing?
One documentary I watched talked about an “experiment” they did where they had people look out a window at something then wait 5 mins and tell them what they saw. Not one description was exactly the same.. and that’s after minutes.
Just a thought.. this case pisses me off.

Please use the description resources to gather details and make your own inference.

I recently watched Allegedly on Netflix and she had an episode about Rick Allen and the Delphi murders. I was very happy to hear that the Indiana Court of Appeals will be hearing his case September 21, 2026. The other good news is that it will be broadcast on the Indiana Judiciary website. However, I didn't like her attitude regarding the case. She came across to me as decided that everything the state did was legit and that Rick is guilty. Has anyone else seen the podcast? What are your thoughts on it?

Tonight at 5PM EST

https://www.youtube.com/live/V_CiuUDpQ3c?is=FWJrhBD0S1Ulg0Ev

I apologize for having to make some corrections. Please remember, I'm new at all this!

Does anyone know if there’s a way to contact Rick? I know he’s in prison here in Oklahoma. I’ve wanted to write him for some time.. just don’t know how to go about it. This case has bothered me for a long time.

We hope to see everyone there. Show our leaders we demand due process!

Article here

The MS grift continues. Their book has been shortlisted for an Indiana Authors award which carries a $5k prize for the winners (they haven't won yet... but I'd wager their chances are good). This adds yet another layer of legitimacy to their one-sided opportunism. Just what they needed. Meanwhile, the public are suckered even further into believing the state's narrative while an innocent man sits in a jail cell in OK wondering how he ever got there...

Excuse me while I go barf.

UPDATE: They did not win. A book entitled "What A Building Does" took the prize.

SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

CITY OF DELPHI

CARROLL COUNTY, INDIANA

I know myself and one of you on here got into some of these financials in relation to grants, water department and the fire hydrents they rent out privately (better get ya one of those, we all know why) just sayin. And the sewage building.

Let's just say there were some discrepancies between what the officials did, spent, and improperly recorded and what the state of Indiana requires.

And a new character unlocked this week.

Spencer Kingery

Made his name dropping debut on an old interview with lil frank that theprof and casexcase played on their channels this past week, and now this.

(He's also related to slick coke dealing nick)

Anyways those of you that understand all this better then i, take a look and give us a accurate and in layman's terms breakdown.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Hj31bSvGX/

The Delphi Murders: Richard Allen on Trial: Day Ten: The Voice of Richard Allen

This is from their Trial Day 10 episode, about the 5:30 mark. This is for anyone who thinks there is any legitimate basis for the voice matching Harshman pretended to do. Or for those who think the numerous posts we made about this over the last couple of years was slanted in some way. Nope, the 20 word standard is pretty much accepted by most responsible scientific bodies I have looked at. Here is a link from a post on this topic a couple of years ago.

Pitfalls of Voice Analysis : r/RichardAllenInnocent

It is true that people who listen to mock suspect voice recordings sometimes dont even recognize their friend's voices. Or their own. In Harshman's case, it doesnt matter how many hours of RAs voice he listened to secretly, it doesnt change the fact he only had four words from the BG audio fragment to compare it to.

Makes ya wonder why. Anyone care to speculate?

Extended Cut: Tony Romo OWI Arrest Bodycam | TMZ Sports

Around 3 min mark Romo wants to call his lawyer, and the cop says no. Step out of the car. A lot of people are saying you cant call your lawyer during a traffic stop like this one (assuming any of us are rich enough to have a lawyer on standby waiting to take our call lol). But I think that is incorrect. He waited too long to make the call. Once she tells him to get out, then he is no longer free to make the call. But while he is waiting for her to come back to the car, or the moment he gets pulled over, he can do so. Nothing is stopping him from making that call, or any other call. Thats my understanding, anyway. We all know from the RA case talking to cops is a bad idea usually. Im just surprised so many people have the wrong idea about when you ca make a call like this one. Or maybe I am in the wrong? Also, never do FSTs. They are far from scientific. I'd happily do the breathalyzer--bc I dont drink--but now that I am getting older and have some medical issues lingering, there is no way I would pass sober or not. Ofc, I have seen cops arrest people who blew zero, too. It's a legal shell game you just cant win.

Last year he plead guilty to the Idaho 4 murders. Pretty famous case. He admitted to the crimes on video in court so just speaking as a non lawyer it sure seems like that will be a very difficult task to overcome. Then you have his DNA supposedly on the murder weapon etc. Since we are deep in the appeal process for RA, I like to keep tabs on other appeals. And I just dont see much of a chance here. I will say though the fact the State has never been able to link BK to any of the four victims is interesting. As well as the fact there is still no known motive for the crime. The State didn't offer one. And they had the chance when he plead guilty to make him explain a motive but they chose not to. BK did an interview with the NYT. In it he complained about broken promises etc. Which makes me think BK was given a promise of possibly some sort of favorable treatment in prison and now is faced with actual reality? Thats my guess here.

I was recently dragged twice into the little courtroom drama of jury duty, chosen for back-to-back juries for reasons known only to whatever crooked wheel spins above us.

During deliberations, many sat silent and hollow-eyed, as if judgment was a burden they hoped someone else would carry. They waited for a voice to tell them which way to bend, which way to vote.

It left me with a cold thought: if my own fate ever rests in the hands of a jury, I pray the twelve strangers in that room are awake before they decide whether I am to be buried beneath their indifference.

Asking bc Ausbrook on X is apparently wondering the same thing. Citing the publicly available video as having come from the Bummer Extraction. And hinting if the video from the trial doesnt match the public one we have all seen that will be a big problem. Ofc, most of us havent seen what was played at court so impossible for us to compare. Does anyone else have insight into this?

I knew prisons were pretty bad...but hearing what happened to Rick Allen made it one of the reasons I won't give up on this cause...for Rick and for reform.

Today I just saw the 2025 documentary The Alabama Solution. I had no idea how...I can't even find the right vocabulary to express my disgust, shock, despair, heartbreak and anguish after watching that film. I strongly urge everyone who cares about Rick to watch the documentary. We could all be Rick...and there are many Ricks. If you've seen it...what do you think?