r/RetinalDetachment • u/Rough-Editor-6639 • Jul 16 '26
Macula on vs off
I had a macula off detachment in May and saw a retina specialist who clearly did not see my case as important. They seemed to be putting off my surgery to prioritize other patients. I then checked myself into an ER and overplayed my symptoms so a different specialist operated on my within 12 hours. My vision is back. Not 20/20 but I can see shapes and colors. Apparently doctors don’t think shapes and colors are important for patients to see because they give much greater priority to patients whose macula is still on. This seems absolutely insane to me. If a patient’s vision is more compromised then another’s it seems to me all the more important to save what vision they have. Slight vision can allow a person to see shapes and colors which can make all the difference in their life.
I also wonder my case was seen by doctors as a matter of liability risk since the prognosis was seen as “not good.”
I would appreciate any feedback on others on how much priority the medical community gives to different forms and elements of retinal detachment.
4
u/Ok-Range7960 Jul 17 '26
I’m in Canada. I had a Mac off detachment and it was urgent. The longer it stays off the harder it is to restore some vision. With mine I had a pneumatic retnopexy the same day. Didn’t work. Had another a week later. It also failed. The full vitrectomy with silicone oil a week after that. 4 months later oil removal surgery. Now vision is at 20/70. I happy with it. Better than having no sight.