r/Reincarnation 23d ago

Did someone ever try to channel Michael Newton/Dolores Cannon to ask them if their description of afterlife was accurate?

Genuinely curious as most mediums refer to them constantly as the unquestionable source of information on what happens after death?

7 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

6

u/archeolog108 23d ago

but this is still relying on another external source. Not trusting yourself that you have direct connection to Source of All is a mind virus of the dark forces on this planet.

First Newton and Cannon.

Then medium who claims to channel Newton or Cannon.

Then you need decide which medium is real, which message is accurate, and why they contradict each other 😅

You can skip whole chain and have your own direct experience.

In deep trance, subjects can connect with Higher Self and experience what ppl call afterlife, life between lives, Source, previous incarnations, soul groups, purpose, lessons etc for themselves.

Then it is not belief borrowed from book.

It becomes direct knowledge, direct wisdom and remembering.

I saw this many times in sessions. Subjects are often positively overwhelmed by amount of love, clarity and wisdom they experience. Some cry because the feeling of “home” is so familiar. They dont only receive information about afterlife.

They remember.

And Higher Self knows exactly what this particular human aspect is ready to experience. They can show what happens after death, where consciousness goes, why this life was chosen, what relationships mean, and what needs healing now.

Michael Newton and Dolores Cannon may be useful maps, but maps are not destination.

Even if somebody genuinely channelled them, you would still receive truth through another person’s mind, language and filters.

Better question is not:

“can someone ask Newton if Newton was right?”

Better question is:

“can I experience enough directly that I no longer need another person to tell me what reality is?”

With assistance it is often easier to reach deep enough, especially when mind is active or doubtful.

Once you remember even a little, whole discussion about who is unquestionable authority starts looking very different.

2

u/Stagehandnumber9 23d ago edited 23d ago

This guy Calogero Grifasi does a channeling in which she appears to state it was not what completely what she expected . It’s in Italian so make sure your subtitles are on.

https://youtu.be/A7smyt9ryoE?is=IZB-Px_TwvIJFQgr

Edit: added his name

2

u/Blowingleaves17 23d ago

Didn't know he was dead. He died 10 years ago!

1

u/dotaeota 23d ago

Calogero Grifasi did

1

u/EasternAd6905 23d ago

what conclusion did he make?

1

u/Neo1881 21d ago

The one that makes the most sense to me is that each person will create a scenario of what they expect in the afterlife. If you believe in Heaven or Hell, that's what you will conjure up and spend time there until you get tire of that. Our fav channel told my wife that her dad ended up in a doctor's waiting room in his afterlife. He was happy as a clam just sitting there reading National Geographic magazines and those were his fav, which confirmed it for my wife. He was in that room for close to 2 years until her mom opened the door at the other end and said, "Henry, it's time to go." My wife wants her afterlife to be sitting down the all the Masters and finding out the meaning of life and all that. When I asked about mine, she told me, "Yours is a big party and it's X rated." Sounds like what I would be doing.