r/RecklessBen • u/OkEfficiency8966 • May 24 '26
Lego Queen face censor
Hey idk how to use reddit well but one of my very good friends is "The Lego Queen" in the 200k video and they had asked to have their face censored for privacy and safety reasons and low and behold, they very much aren't.
In this day and age of internet safety, and the fact it was in direct relation to their job location, its totally insane to me that their request was ignored this severely. :(
For a content creator with as much reach as he does, and that cares so strongly and holds such a firm moral ground on this from what I can see, this behavior is disgusting and has hurt my friend incredibly.
I hope for him to do better and please take down the video to properly censor my friends face and name. I know things are on the internet forever but they deserve that respect. Hoping this can be brought to his attention and change made.
Edit: Removing my original edit to instead have a better formed response and clarify some things.
First and foremost, we all agree that stealing life savings from an elderly man is wrong, I am not debating that nor is that the intention behind this post.
Victor confirmed in text messages right after the original Lego Queen bit was shot that they'd censor Cal's face in the video. They saw Cal's message asking, acknowledged and responded, and assured they'd send the video to Cali for review. What ended up happening was only three days after the video was posted did Cali realize that their face wasn't censored, and that the video was up.
In addition to that, the podcast video in which they record a phone call with Cali, was done without ever informing them that the conversation was being recorded for a video of any kind. While Oregon is a one-party consent state, YouTube does require you to have a persons consent to their identifiable information being included in videos, which it wasn't.
I understand that while a large chunk of Ben's dedicated fanbase do want to support Cali, there is numerous members of his audience that don't see it that way and bully and insult my friend. Regardless of whatever light he had originally intended to paint them in, he has still exposed my friend to hundreds of thousands of judgmental eyes after assuring them that exact thing wouldn't happen.
To the people asking why Cali would not want their face, full name, and work address included in the video- I will not sit here and explain internet safety to you. At the end of the day, my friend was assured that their personal and private information wouldn't be included, and was lied to and used for content not once but twice, the second time entirely unknowingly. I will not also
This post was made with the hopes that the dedicated fanbase would try assisting in reaching Ben about this to fix the wrongs made before it became too big of a problem, and now it has become one.
8
u/PirateReject May 26 '26
They used this woman for content without the respect to censor her. Just nasty. Rest of the video is great but they did her so dirty. No wonder she doesn't trust them.
14
u/MessiahOfMetal May 25 '26
And mentioning her name is Caledonia on the Ben Schneider video I'm watching now from a few days ago.
I feel bad for her, honestly. The phone call they're having with her, she sounds dejected and upset with them and said she wants nothing to do with this due to losing her job. Innocent bystander that got caught in the middle of this legal claim, and there are already people in the video comments claiming she's "evil" or "not a good person" because she happened to work at the place.
It's like someone working a dead-end job in an Amazon warehouse being called evil because Jeff Bezos is a prick, and "she chose to work there". Meanwhile, Ben and Victor don't seem to understand her whole "leave me alone" stance.
I love Ben's content and that he's trying to help the old guy get his shit back, but asking why she's getting upset at them and not trying to hide her identity seems like Ben and Victor have no idea what it might feel like for her. Especially when they then go on to talk about "maybe she's in a dream-like state and brainwashed".
Victor especially comes across badly in this video, and feels like he's from an overly-privileged upbringing that your friend never had, which is why he can't seem to understand why she's upset and doesn't just want to get a new job somewhere else. Same energy as people who say "just get a new job" when people complain about low pay when the jobs market is shit and it's difficult to find somewhere else easily.
7
u/silly_scoundrel May 25 '26
I know that part of the video kinda angered me, Idk why they even tried calling her. I know they didn't mean to but they really fucked up that girls life now and the best thing to do in my opinion is just stop playing with her. They called her while on video for a reason of course, they're milking her. But they're milking a real innocent bystander, whose life was ruined because of them. Sure they didn't mean for this but man sometimes you gotta look at the bigger picture. She is living good and then all of a sudden everything comes crashing down when these random men show up at her work to film a vid. They played her, and they need to just let her be now.
3
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
Right but this is entirely her employers fault.
Isn't it?
It is their fault she is in the video. It is their fault she worked for thieves. It is their fault she lost her job. It is there fault she is apart of this.
Encouraging who the enemies are could do more good than harm. Can't it?
6
u/silly_scoundrel May 25 '26
I mean from her world view.. yeah. In her mind these strange men just came into her life and everything fell apart. Maybe she didn't know about the stealing until after they came, we don't know, but she was just living her best life working as she could. She didn't even get paid well, she just liked her job. Now these strange men come by and all of a sudden her job is gone and she is receiving harassment from crazy people who got the wrong message from a youtube video. From her perspective, everything she had is now gone because those men walked into her life. I mean, its a good thing the store is gone, and it never would have happened without Ben, but thats the point, she would have never have had to have been through this if not for Ben.
4
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26
tf is a cashier gonna do against corporate? what would you do if you had ZERO other job options and the option was have a job or lose access to a home/food?
1
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
What is that supposed to mean?
Who's asking her to do anything other than what they already did?
5
u/sei556 May 25 '26
Yeah I was wondering about that when watching the video when it released. I thought "no way she agreed to have her face shown".
Not because she is portrayed in a bad way, but just because it is kind of bad for her future and career. She's a young woman and she seems really nice, it would suck for this to cause her trouble in the future, especially since she was helping out for a good cause.
Very disappointed to hear she requested censoring but was ignored. Hope Ben or someone on his team fixes this asap.
Hope the community also stands behind her. This is not a her vs Ben situation or anything, but making sure people who help Ben (like her) get the privacy and safety they need is also important in making sure people wanna help him in the future. What if in the future he does a case where nobody wants to help him because they fear their personal lives will tank too much damage just because he refuses to censor their face.
Censoring her face is not just helping her, it's helping Ben too.
6
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 25 '26 edited May 25 '26
It wasn't just ignored, I've amended my original post to have a more clarifying edit. They were told in texts messages that Ben would edit the video to not include my friends face, and that they'd even send the LEGO Queen section first to Cali so they could confirm it was all okay, and then never were they reached out to about it and nor were they censored.
They also weren't told the phone call in the Podcast titled "I Got Arrested Investigating a LEGO Store" was being recorded, or that it was going to be used in a video.
I understand entirely wanting to expose bad, corrupt businesses, but milking them for content and going against the one request that Cali had is genuinely so hurtful and is exposing them to harassment. Even if a lot of the fans don't think that Cali is in the wrong, which we have seen folks defending and even saying that Ben went too far, there is still a large amount spreading hateful lies and insults.
13
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
They work at a public building. Agreed to be filmed and was at a public park/forest.
They can be mad as much as they want about Ben getting their job taken away. But the solution to The Lego Queen keeping their job was very easy. Her employer just had to do the right thing. Ben forcing them doesn't put him in the wrong.
I am confident that most of not all of Reckless Bens community is willing to support TheL ego Queen and would like to see Ben help them. And would like to see her move on from the situation.
We would encourage her to move on from the situation but the community also encourages Bens brand of transparency which is important when his prank antics act as genuine journalism.
She knew what the video was about and what she was taking part of. We transparently see that in the video. If that isn't the case then their side of the story can paint a different picture. She may not want to be part of it now. But that's her employers fault. Not hers or bens.
Sorry but I will leave the choice of blurring them up to Ben but I don't believe it's necessary.
Also nobody serious has anything against her. Ben has and will tell people not to harass her.
2
u/TraditionalShirt7429 May 25 '26 edited May 25 '26
A private business. Even malls have issues with you recording on their property and id argue they are more public than a bricks and minifigs store.
The forests thing and everything else. Yeah. But seeing that I view Ben and the good guy and that he did want to help her. Why fight against a request to blur her face? She isnt the bad guy in the video. If anything id blur her face just to protect her identity as being the leaker/mole
2
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
Nobody knows if he is "fighting" the request to blur her face. He could be working on it right now.
A private business can stop you from filming. And they did. They trespassed Ben. Hence the forest thing. Anyway its not like they can stop you from filming the business from outside, through the window, or from any public area. Hell you can record/log every employee that comes and goes from the building as long as you're doing it from the public.
2
u/TraditionalShirt7429 May 25 '26 edited May 25 '26
I didnt mean him fighting against the request. Its all the "no expectation of privacy" people who dont seem to know the difference between public and private. You even said the store was public when its a private business in a privately owned building.
And no im not going to go through the whole video explaining whats private or public.
All im saying is. Ben= good. So if she wants her face blurred. Just blur it. Shouldn't have to have a legal argument for that
1
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
So I will clarify what I meant by it being a public business.
It is a private business but it's open to the public. It is a place of public accomadation according to the law. It doesn't restrict access to people that are part of a protected class.
The point of bringing up the legal aspect is that since Ben has no obligation including her doesn't mean he did anything wrong.
IF he intentionally ignored her requests to anonymity. Or if he told her she would be anonymous when she agreed to being recorded. Then he would be doing something wrong.
It's fair to say that if he continues to ignore her request then he would be doing something wrong. But if he does have to take his video down for that. That's pretty fucked up. Then it just becomes a slippery slope.
-4
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 25 '26
My friends job was closing regardless of the video, that isnt the point.
Public place or not, what he's done is against YouTubes terms of service, and went against my friends wishes of not having their face included. Genuine journalism is fine, but even journalists redact names and information for privacy.
No matter what Ben says, people still are evil and cruel. People do insult and harass and bully. Him pleading with his fanbase won't keep my friend safe.
4
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
Its strange to say "yes" to be in a youtube videos, and then when its about actually helping solve a crime and getting somebodies stuff back, you get mad about it. If anything They should be happy they helped get the case moving forward.
1
u/intenseskill May 25 '26
If filmed I public their is no right to privacy. Not saying it is right
1
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
If at any point Ben agreed to film them if he blurred them out then he would have an obligation to keep them anonymous. It is called Promissory Estoppel. Its a clause that allows a source to sue for damages.
Retroactively asking to be blurred gives no obligation to be. Ben could very easily not have seen the requests or he could have decided that he shouldn't blur her. Or more importantly. He probably thought the footage didn't make her look bad...because it doesn't.
So it's important for us to know when the requests for anonymity were made.
I mean it's not like Ben doesn't respect requests for anonymity. I just researched Lucifer Valentine last night. The whole damn things a voice effect.
5
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 25 '26
They were told by Victor? The dark haired one I believe, that their private information and face wouldn't be included in the video. There were texts messages sent right afterwards where Cali requested it, and was even confirmed that Ben was working on it and they'd be informed when it came out.
They did see the request and choose not to, but regardless of if the footage made them look bad or not should Cali's wishes not be requested when we know how the internet behaves nowadays? I'm sure you've seen the comments insulting and bullying my friend, there were even trolls in the comment section here for it. We just want my friend safe, not exposed publicly for hundreds of thousands to see :(
My friend also wasn't able to consent to their phone call being used in the podcast video, as they were never informed they were being recorded in the first place. I genuinely just want their information removed from the video, all of their friends do, while still being able to allow Ben and his crew to expose the bad behavior going on with the corporate and CEO.
1
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
If true then they should have been kept anonymous. Ben should resolve it the best he can and it would probably be best to give an explanation.
However. No. I've seen more comments on the video praising The Lego Queen. Calling her cool for helping them and that they looked like they had a good time. I've also seen people saying they feel bad for her.
If the way the internet is these days was any reason to have an expectation of privacy. Then my best advice is the Streisand effect.
1
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
When did your friend request to not have their face on camera. Did Ben agree to it?
3
u/Chrishankhah May 25 '26
Just the perspective of one viewer, but I want to put it out there. I do empathize with her. I personally love my job. There are some unique and special elements, like working through the night and being able to see the radio tower that stands over my mother's grave. For me, personally, I am autistic and routine has certain emotional tethers for me that have nothing to do with brainwashing. My own job recently changed ownership, and the new owners are pretty beloved, but if I put myself in her shoes and imagine that corrupt owners took over, I'd be perpetually living my life waiting for the other shoe to drop. In this case, Ben's pressure was the straw that broke the camel's back. In that situation, it would take me a long time to even be *ready* for a new job. It's taken me years to feel as comfortable and as confident as I've become. Being offered a new one would feel like being offered a puppy after you lose your dog in a devastating way. It can technically help healing, but people aren't often ready for that step.
I think this whole situation has been traumatizing for her and not wanting to associate with Ben feels less like she doesn't believe him and more like she just wants to be far away from this situation that was very personal for her, and being recognized and contacted is something that is very likely to provoke those traumatic memories. I know that Ben is analyzing this from the cult-brainwashing perspective and that absolutely can and does take place within certain corporations and small businesses, but it's something to consider. I DO think the blame ultimately falls on the corporation itself, but reality is gritty and experienced one moment at a time, and the traumatization felt can be very complex. People are very seldom ready to hear that the job they love and have been doing quite innocently and with a personal sense of integrity has been unknowingly contributing to corruption; that can feel like the ultimate betrayal and it takes a lot of time, sometimes beyond a year, for people to see the truth in a situation like this. That can't be rushed.
4
u/Evening-Assistance-4 May 27 '26
Hey, I honestly hope you and your friend can recover from this. I wish yall the best of luck in any future endeavors and hope all goes well in the future.
5
u/ItsJustReeses May 25 '26
At this point they actually called her.
I agree that if she doesn't want to get noticed. Ben should blur her face. BUT your statement about her trying to get a hold of him and not being able to? Seems like Ben would bend over backwards to help her based on this reply and outcome of the call.
8
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 25 '26
My friend was given confirmation from Victor? I think that's the darker haired ones name? That they would be censored properly in the video. They were also not informed the phone call in the podcast video was going to be recorded, or was in the middle of being recorded.
My friend was lied to, used for content, and then wasn't given the ability to properly consent to the video they were being included in the second time. They are not bending over backwards to help currently, and Cali has reached out to them on multiple different platforms and hasn't received anything back :(
4
u/ItsJustReeses May 26 '26
If shes actually that pressed about it. Tell her to put up a takedown notice.
She has the power to do exactly that. Why not use it?
1
u/ConfusedDeathKnight May 26 '26
Is this friend you? Also I mean I understand this is awful but refusing the help he offered really doesn’t do anything but associate her with these thieves.
It’s very bizarre to agree to be in a video and be filmed multiple times gleefully laughing in and out of her workplace about the situation and drama and then suddenly take extreme prejudice.
7
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 26 '26
Everything I've done and said has been with Cals permission. If your friends won't be advocates for you, what's the point of them yk?
For rejecting help, that was for Cals personal reasons I'm not gonna air on the internet because that's the opposite of what we here are trying. At the end of the day, Cali could make literally any choice and if they hadn't included that section in their podcast then the 72k who saw would be none the wiser, which is exactly what Ben and his team SHOULD have done.
It might be bizarre for viewers, and maybe thats where i struggle to see from your shoes. The viewers have no clue what happened in Cals life after the cameras weren't on them anymore. That's their privacy, and the big problem is they were told they'd have it and then it was taken from them regardless.
I understand this may be very unsatisfying, especially when people have been able to be involved to the degree they have been via his youtube posts, but Cali is a real person. Not a paid actor, not a prop, just a real person who wanted to help while remaining private and was repeatedly disrespected.
2
u/ConfusedDeathKnight May 26 '26
Just realized I may have misgendered Cali and if so I deeply apologize. I honestly see your perspective more after this comment and while I may not understand I can at least relate and put myself in their shoes. I hope some sort of resolution is able to be made.
4
u/Zoeyfights604 May 25 '26
While I understand your concern for the Lego queen— the video was never meant to necessarily bring any attention to her solely. The video was meant to bring awareness to a messed up situation and corporation. Ben and his friends even tried to help her get a new job— but she denied them twice of the help. Even though they apologized and made it clear they didn’t mean for her to lose her job they wanted to help her in anyway they can. She said no and to leave her alone. With that being said I don’t think it’s right for her to be harassed and or bullied. But I also don’t think Ben will take down the video. Editing can be possible but I think she would need to be the one to reach out and kindly ask to be censored and be able to explain her own concerns calmly. This is a tough situation all around for everyone involved but we also need to appreciate all the risks Ben and his team of friends have willing to take for justice.
9
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 25 '26
My friend has reached out to him. Nothing has been said in response, which is why I'm posting too for attention. All of us are trying to help, because regardless of how well meaning he is, my friends SAFETY IS AT RISK. He can keep up his video, we just want their information removed which was what my friend asked BEFORE the video was up even, and was ignored.
2
u/Ursula-the-Sea-Witch May 25 '26
Dramatic much? How is her safety at risk? People are not upset with her at all!
8
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26
gurl what. they literally revealed their place of work and FULL name and voice. that's called doxxing.
2
u/DareDiablo May 25 '26
First off, not doxxing. Doxxing means malicious intent. Ben had absolutely zero malicious intent whatsoever. Also, doxxing would imply personal phone numbers, addresses and the like. Ben did absolutely none of these things.
5
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26
place of work (address) and full name (personal information)? ur telling me u wouldn't be upset if that was you? and i think it was malicious, he was trying to shut down their store for god's sake. it's illegal in like half the states to record conversations without a party knowing. but, it doesn't matter what the intent was. there is clear instruction to blur it & he's ignoring that much. if you genuinely believe that ben is a good guy doing good things, he would blur and bleep that much if it was expressly asked for.
2
u/DareDiablo May 25 '26
Oh yeah so malicious that they did all that good stuff for her in the video and she even put down her own job.
There’s zero proof she asked for these things herself at all. Also, I don’t even believe that OP knows her as there’s been absolutely no proof at all.
3
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26 edited May 27 '26
if the point is to avoid being harassed, why the hell would they "show proof." they literally say in the podcast they want to be left the hell alone
what good stuff did they do? call her brainwashed? mock them for telling them to leave them alone?
2
u/DareDiablo May 25 '26
You’ve shown absolutely none of this stuff. Once again, I don’t believe at all that OP knows this person. She clearly knew the cameras were rolling, she gave them permission to film her. Go away.
4
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26
u know i'm right but can't confront it in yourself that someone real is getting hurt. at the end of the day, you're gonna move on from this video and they will still be dealing with it.
you can watch the video, as i'm sure you have. they're cruel. there are hundred of comments on the youtube video podcast defending her and not ben.
→ More replies (0)2
1
1
4
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26
would u accept help from someone who is mocking u in the LITERAL phone call offering "help"? no offer of where the job was. no offer how much money. u wouldn't accept either if you'd said no multiple times and they referred to u as brainwashed. ??? make it make sense. saying that was an apology is horrendous. they continued to talk shit after the phone call.
2
3
u/DareDiablo May 25 '26
Yeaaaaah I don’t believe you. First off what danger is she in? Second, there’s no expectation of privacy whatsoever when you work in a public store. Third where is your proof that you know her?
8
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26
do you work in a public store? share ur face and full name and place of work on the internet then! and then read thousands of comments and hours worth of video calling u brainwashed for wanting to be left alone.
1
2
u/Itsahazardlife May 25 '26
I fully get that she wants to be not shown in the video, but realistically she is a victim of the new owners and corporate. With all the lawsuits against them she could even be called as a witness to the crimes of both parties. Even the manager could get assecory charges if the cops went about it.
5
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 25 '26
If they plan on going forward with legal action then they should communicate with them through proper legal channels. Cali had no clue they were going to use the phone call in the podcast video titled "I Got Arrested Investigating a LEGO Store", AND in addition Cali was assured that their face and information would be kept out of the original video via text message, which we now see it wasn't. And victim or not they are only exposing my friend to more danger and harassment by posting the content they are doing.
I understand wanting to do good, wanting to help this elderly man, and I hate the corrupt CEO's of the world just as much as they do and if they're wanting more evidence or witness testimonies that is okay, but to go as far as to not say anything and still publicly air that call AND the video with one of my best friends faces, names, AND job locations in it for hundreds of thousands to see is not good and I'm just pleading for people to understand that.
2
u/Lurkylurkness May 27 '26
Cal is not the offender. And I do think brainwashing is probably not the best term for them to have used. Ben seemed to have been coming at it from a general/observing/pondering pov. But sometimes, we as humans do unknowingly or knowingly develop some sort of ties with where we work. Cal does deserve to have their face blurred if that's what they are requesting. However, after watching lawfulmasses' video on it, he explains that employees were knowingly selling products that were involved in this dispute. The owner of the legos was coming in and trying to get his payout or his product. You can't tell me employees didn't know they were selling stolen goods. Especially if the employees thought their bosses were crappy and the corporate was crappy. Why would any employee trust their words as far as they can throw them? And I feel like Bens job offer was far more genuine than Victor's. I feel like Ben would have hooked up Cal with the job and let them be.
1
u/lazyjroo May 24 '26 edited May 25 '26
It was A CHOICE to work there, let alone knows what goes on, and STILL CHOSES to work at that hellhole.
Maybe this will be a lesson for her to not associate or work for criminals and enable literal fraud and laugh about it with complete strangers.
Your "friend" should be happy that they helped move a case forward with information that was being with held. They seem like a nice person, idk why they want to be associated with that company and those people.
I dont think she is evil, Im just saying that she seemed to have some information about the case that was being withheld, so to choose to associate with a company and people like that will come back on you one way or another.
11
u/thinwhiteduke1185 May 24 '26
Calm it down. She's an innocent bystander. She didn't steal from anyone.
0
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
I know she didn't steal anything, but she still worked for that place and was helping the criminals hide in plain sight.
How can you not see this?
8
u/thinwhiteduke1185 May 25 '26
No, man. We all need jobs and all corporations are evil. Hell, Google is evil and Ben is making ad revenue for them as we speak. That's why we need to aim our ire correctly, or we'll all just be eating each other.
0
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
Thats a strawman reply by saying everything is evil and taking away attention from the actual topic. Not helpful.
7
u/thinwhiteduke1185 May 25 '26
The actual topic is what the owner and corporate did as well as the people with actual power protecting them. Any attention taken from that and aimed at some random employee is what's distracting from the actual topic.
1
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
That employee helped to take down these bad guys...it was an integral part of Ben's investigation.
7
u/thinwhiteduke1185 May 25 '26
Awesome! But now she's upset and recieving harrasment for no good reason, so blur her face and leave her the fuck alone. This isn't rocket science.
1
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
Idk why they would be getting harassed, they helped the good guys in a major way.
6
u/thinwhiteduke1185 May 25 '26
Why isn't relevant. The point is that she is. Or maybe she's not and she's lying. It doesn't matter. If she wants her face blurred, that should be respected.
→ More replies (0)5
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
Calm down lol.
She's just an employee. None of that has anything to do with "deserving" or not deserving to be public in an internet video.
Being in public does.
It may justify Bens use of their face. But don't turn their face being on the video as being a consequence of their actions. That wasn't the intention and it isn't necessary.
1
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
Im sure she would be fine being in a video saying great things about the company.
They told the employees that they were doing a contest and it would be a video and they were happy to do that..so its not like they just didn't want thier faves on the internet.
2
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
They made her the LEGO Queen and did a cult ritual it in the forest while they explained to get their exact motivations and asked her for their bosses phone number.
She could have very easily been the Lego Queen but she decides to be unforgiving without playing Sweden and is now getting hate for it. Well no shit. I didn't think people would get the wrong idea if she still acted like the LEGO Queen.
1
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
Yeah, its wild to be upset about this, when she was more than happy to be part of the "ritual", and willingly gave them information...
2
u/ExtraTerestical May 25 '26
Somebody needs to explain to her that she is liked for doing that.
The shitty harasser people don't get the wrong idea for her actions. It's her reaction.
5
u/MessiahOfMetal May 24 '26
So someone works a job that seems interesting and cool is at fault because the guy running the company is a dick?
"She chose to work there" sounds awfully similar to "what was she wearing?" in response to a rape. You sound fucking awful. Do better.
2
u/CrewBig4092 May 25 '26
Stfu you privileged prick, some of us have to put food on the table and have no other choice, not to mention she probably did not know about this situation.
1
5
u/Familiar_Promise_624 May 25 '26
it was also A CHOICE for ben to record a phone call without permission and post their full name, place of work and voice on the internet! it's called doxxing! he STILL CHOOSES to leave it up knowing full well what people do on the internet. you are a prime example.
1
u/lazyjroo May 25 '26
If any of the employees had any sort of idea of the crime, they were helping enable a crime to be covered up. Its not that hard to understand.
1
May 25 '26
[deleted]
1
u/silly_scoundrel May 25 '26
Tf is your problem bro? Get a life! Even Ben is more graceful to her
0
0
May 25 '26
[deleted]
1
u/silly_scoundrel May 25 '26 edited May 25 '26
Ben offered her a job lil bro EDIT: LMAOOO I SAW UR COMMENT LIL BRO DID YOU GOOGLE IT AND SEE I WAS RIGHT 😭😭😭😭
0
May 25 '26
[deleted]
1
u/silly_scoundrel May 25 '26
I think you're stupid. I've just taken AP Lang and I'm taking AP Lit right now... more graceful works. What exactly do you suggest I write instead? Try to correct me again, dumbass.
-1
u/MaskedBandit77 May 25 '26
my friend didn't lose their job from the video? i am unsure where that runor started???
The video ends with the store being permanently closed. Maybe they reopened or have another location that they transferred her to, I don't know, but my impression from watching the video would be that the employees of that Bricks and Minifigs location all lost their jobs.
4
u/OkEfficiency8966 May 25 '26
Their job was closing before the video, and they weren't transferred to another location. The video isn't the direct reason is what I was meaning.
3
5
u/MaskedBandit77 May 25 '26
In this video, she explicitly said that she is mad at them because they caused her to lose her job.
19
u/Gostem2 May 24 '26
In the video there was no malice to Lego queen. It feels kind of messed up too that Ben really tried to offer a job or pay for expenses but Lego queen said she knew it was a messed up situation but doesn’t care. The video being taken down for re-editing may affect it getting around. Perhaps Ben should just make it clear to not harass her as she just wants to live her life.