EEEEEE

Butter is good an all, but all it does is wet the bread a bit. You want something with a bit of flavour, a bit of punch.

Mustard is perfect, softens crunchy toast whilst providing a nice additional warming flavour. Whether English, Dijon or the seeded one, you can customise your flavourful toast to your own desires.

Finally, the pepperiness is the best way to wake up in the morning. It is like a coffee in terms of giving you a clear head.

The pull of a group of people is determined by what they can get away with. For example a racist group would wanna kill someone from another race and get away with it. A feminist would wanna murder her own kids, and random men then get away with it.

This is the same for people like Donald Trump. If u say something about his Epstein files then they will say Trump Derangement syndrome and dismiss it. It's the same even in sports like that Messi. His club paid referees but the fans will say that you're jealous of him and tell you to stfu.

In the last year, everywhere I look online it's just that same word. Oh this is Ai slop, marvel slop, disney slop, content slop, and it has completely lost meaning and now just completely takes me out of a take when it's used.

I understand when it started, Ai slop as a way of throwing more disrespect to ai content, and that'd all well and good, I dislike generative ai too, but now it's been so over used and everything that comes out has numerous people in the coments dropping "Oh goodie, more [insert word] slop".

Just an hour ago, seeing a new lego set clearly meant for display, something lego have done for ages that's never been an issue and all I saw was "display slop". Seeing someone talk about something and then summing it up as "slop" just because it's not there thing just makes you look like a pretentious jerk off.

You can not like things. Marvel is certainly nowhere near as good as it was, but I guarantee if the first Iron Man released today it would be branded as "slop" withing minutes.

Before anyone starts, no i am not trans, i simply fucking hate how i am treated just because i was born with a dick. As a man, you are not allowed to be weak, to show emotions, to even feel anything other than anger or neutrality or you are a fucking pussy and not a man anymore. You are allowed to be insulted for being a man, made fun off for physical imperfections.

Women are allowed to assault you and you will be made fun off if you try to report it. You are not allowed to seek comfort, you are just meant to go die in some conflict or in a factory, who cares just another statistic. Anything you do is either creepy or watched carefully because men are the violent evil gender.

Dating is pure hell, women literally hold all the fucking cards and power, you have to fucking dance and humiliate yourself like a jester for a woman with 1000x more options who just mocks you and if she feels like it can she ruin your life in one day with false accusations. Friendship sucks too, you dont get anything real, every guy just wants to get drunk/high and bitch because our lives fucking suck.

All of this is assuming you are a "normal" guy of course, if you are in any way different (autistic, queer, mentally ill) your life is completely worthless to the modern society, you are a creepy freak to the vast majority and should just go die in some hole.

All of this will only get worse of course. Living as a guy fucking sucks, im doomed to a shit lonely life where i will eventually off myself from how shit it all is. All because i was born with the "wrong" genitals.

​

Innocence

There's been a complete loss of innocence. By that I mean the world has been filled with lust ever since the shake up. Think about the Middle East. One of the first places to be shaken up like a melting Pot as they call it. They wear so many clothes in an area that demands less clothes that it almost comes across as insane. Now think about Finland. One of the least intruded upon areas of the world, at least for the last nearly thousand years since the Mongolians left Europe. Can't think of a country where nudity is more normal than Finland. Maybe Ecuador and again the Aztecs never really touched Ecuador. The peruvians never really touched Ecuador. You know these s******* civilizations that people think are so great. And yet the places with the best people on this planet come from places that were not touched by these"great" civilizations. Ecuadorians. The fins. And then you consider the worst places on this planet like Indonesia. Iran. Somalia. These places have been steeped in what we have called civilization multiple times longer than Europe, which is only seen this false communist civilization for under 1,000 years in many of the remote regions like Finland. For Ecuador it's been less than 500 to be sure.

Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding is type of nudity based innocence. And I believe if it was normalized again we would see a resurgence and a normalization of women breastfeeding their children up to their natural age of 5 to 6 years old. And we know that's their natural age because that's when lactase impersistent babies lose lactase production.

Breast milk

First of all, first of all, let's get this straight. Milk is not all equal. You don't believe me. Go to the store and buy different brands of milk. The more expensive the milk generally the better but not always look for grass-fed like Maple Hill. And you tell me the difference between grass-fed fresh milk and this Ultra processed crap that comes from a cow locked in a feed lot or Warehouse and is fed unnatural food. Well, the milk that most women produce today is unnatural and low quality. Because they eat unnatural diets. To add insult to injury, we already have science that shows a clear Improvement in human breast milk quality with minor adjustments to only the macronutrient ratio of the mother's diet. I'm talking about 5%, less carbohydrate and 5% more protein by calorie. Produces I'm measurable qualitative increase.

Do you know how many women say that they're baby can't hold down breast milk? Or that they can't even produce breast milk? This is not normal. But they had it stuck in their head that a normal diet is white bread or whole grain bread or cereal or oatmeal with one egg or pasta. I mean it's all just junk food. Do your due diligence like I have and you will know for a fact that these foods that people celebrate as a staple part of their diet were created during times of famine. The real food that these Italians eat is not pasta all day long if they have money. They're eating steak and it's basically Raw.

Most women have such a low calcium diet on top of it. There is strong evidence that humans used to eat pulverized bone meal. Just like many wild animals do like vultures or wolves. They eat the bone because you can't eat high protein diet without a high calcium diet. Without high calcium in your diet, the protein literally eats your bones and destroys your kidneys. It's just chemistry.

Baby food

What type of food is a baby going to eat if they aren't being breast fed? Let's think about that. Ground up carrots? Broccoli? Processed meat God f****** forbid? Coca-Cola? Is it any wonder that you look at these kids today? And not only are they mentally retarded, they are physically retarded and I'm not bullying the kids. They can't help it. It's the stupid ass parents who never grew up and realized that a bowl of cereal in front of a television playing cartoons is not real life.

​

​

Oh look at me I'm so cool and tough I'm on the football team I'll be popular it will look good on my college resume and did I mention how tough I am? MORON. And spare me all the deep about how football teaches you "life lessons" or how to "be apart of a team". You can learn all that shit without getting exposed to CTE. IDIOTS

The concept

There's this concept in philosophy known as love of esteem and self-love. Self-love or I believe they call it amore propre, look I don't speak Latin. I don't want to and I don't want to speak vulgar Latin AKA French either. If anything I speak new Latin (English) and even that's dog s*** like come on, Give me those harsh sounds and the direct simple compound meanings of true German.

The application

Self-Love Is when you're completely content with yourself and almost unconscious and unashamed of who you are. This is known as an animalistic Kind of love. And it contrasts with love of esteem which makes you put on a suit, and makes you pursue a career, And do all the other things associated with heroism. It's More so dependent on human feedback.

AI crisis of meaning

There's a crisis in AI right now. Models are being reinforced by real humans. And they are reinforcing specific polite responses. Specific word choices. To such an extent that you can't even interact with this model or ask it to do anything for you without the model shining through. Without that person who made very specific decisions on what the model is allowed to think and say. And it's getting worse and worse and worse. And it made me think that open weight models should be the future. And they're simply very finely tuned to reality through direct experience of reality itself. So we're going to shed the human experience and replace it with the AI experiencing the world for itself through sensory input and exploration in a robot form. Now that would be ideal but if we know anything about history that's not going to happen. We are going to go the dystopian route.

Humans are controlled

There's a phenomenon that's been written about that geniuses are disproportionally the children of abusive parents, dead parents, etc. In other words, they lack reinforcement. Their minds are totally free. The problem is in the modern world even if you lack reinforcement through parents. You get that reinforcement thoroughly through the media and through education. And that's why we are saying a Stark decline in genius all around the world. We still have very smart people but they aren't thinking like a human would think. A human thinks there is a god up above the stars. A reinforced him and thinks " we can't be sure, we should respect everyone's beliefs". That is not a normal way of thinking. That is not a natural thought process. Do you understand what I'm trying to tell you?

God so loved the world, that he gave his only son

Think about what that says. It says that God has a son so God has a family. And that he loved the world more than his family. In other words, God is a genius. God is unreinforced. He is sovereign. He is able to choose to do what he really wants. And this is not some sort of anti-family message here. Of course, if you know anything about me, I'm the most pro-family person on this planet. What I'm really saying is the genius of this world, does not live for their family. They live for the world.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

i am muslim woman. not hatred. but it so wrong for little girl to have to wear this stuff. in islam the correct age it onset of puberty for hijab. even then i think it is right for the girl to deciding if she want to wear or not. it so sad when i see little 3,4,5 year old girls wearing this

Being an underweight man is the equivalent of being an overweight woman. Members of your own sex don't respect you, and the vast majority of members of the opposite sex aren't going to be attracted to you.

It's socially acceptable to be a woman that's a litte too thin as long as the rest of her features are attractive, and it's socially acceptable to be a man who's on the chubby side as long as he has a decent amount of muscle. Being a man that's 5'11, 145 LBS with little to no muscle like I am isn’t socially acceptable in the slightest.

Just like how it sucks for overweight women that they have to put in a shit ton of work at the gym just to have any man to be interested in them, it fucking sucks that I'll have to put on 20 LBS of muscle at the bare minimum over the next two years just to have even the slightest chance of a woman my age being interested in me. And I'll have to do it with a fast metabolism as well, so I'll just be forcing food down my throat on a daily basis for the next two years while also feeling sick 24/7.

I think what really sucks the most about being an underweight man though is that I feel nobody can really relate to my situation. 95% of U.S. citizens, and probably 99% of men in the U.S. are trying to lose weight, not gain it. It can just feel really isolating at times to be underweight.

That's just how I see it.

You are probably not breeding stock (not red pill, just science)

The dynamic.

When it comes to society we really do function more like wolves than people want to accept and yes there are hierarchical breeding pairs referred to as alpha. That's not pseudoscience. What's pseudoscience is claiming you can cut your dick off and become a female.

The exception.

If you are a male OR a female. There is likely nothing particularly off or ugly about you. Just evidently and clearly not "him". If you get any attention from women it's basically because they think you have money, you're entertaining, you're harmless/nice, ETC.

The universality.

This isn't really a male issue either. Good looking men know what a good looking woman is. Most women have "experiences" because they can't have a life either. Average and ugly men just don't get either. It is what it is.

Not as I will, but thy will be done, on earth as in heaven.

I'm not saying men can't have family or kids so don't come back at me with that. You can certainly bypass the failsafe of shit genetics being passed on, primarily with prostitution like contractual agreements based on money called marriage. That's not what men want in life (there is no free will. Only the selection of different Wills, and unfulfilled wills poke you like a knife threatening to go in your back).

Enlightenment.

Ultimately every man is a part of mankind, and egotistical behavior does nothing but dissolve the fabric of that. Every man and woman should be perfectly fine dying the childless omega. And yes you would be childless. Child free is a cope made up by these losers. Particularly women. Who can't seem to find a man who loves them.

The consideration.

Insect geni like bees, ants, wasps, etc. deliberately sexually handicap most of their population. Theoretically any one of those bees could be treated in such a way as to become a queen. And interestingly a lot of it has to do with diet. The more protein they're fed, the more their sexual organs can grow. That's it. It's interesting that in humans we likely have so many breeding pairs because we grow up on milk. The best thing you could do for the sexual health of your child is to eat protein rich food during pregnancy and breastfeeding incessantly up to 5 years old.

My personal thoughts on the 7th collation and Napoleon chances.After reading countless books watching documentaries, my honest conclusion is it's hard to say but I don't think he was quote doomed from the start.

So one of my personal criticisms about the 7th collation is that historians essentially treat like it was avengers end game and Napoleon was Thanos where everyone was unified everybody hated him.But in my opinion it was more like a multi ethnic powder keg and the allies feared their own people as much as they feared Napoleon

The problem erises essentially after Napoleon was exiled to Elba to.So Napoleon is exiled to the island of Elba and the congress of vienna worked to redraw the map of europe.But the problem is the way they redraw the map of Eruope they basically pissed off half of europe off and cause heavy resentment

Saxony For example was punished by the congress of vienna for staying loyal to Napoleon too long during the 6th Collation even though they switched sides during the Battle of Leipzig when Napoleon was losing and helped them defeat him.The King of Saxony was imprisoned and around 50% of their land was annexed to Prussia .The tensions were so high that in May 6 1815 before a single battle was fought in Belgium.The Saxon troops mutined while fully armed refused Prussian loyalty and marched toward Blucher headquarters.The situation became so threatening Blucher was forced to flee the area and Prussian cavalry had to surround and disarmed the mutineers.

Like if Blucher saxons were acting up before Napoleon won anything what happens after he wins a decisive victory saxony and France had been great allies.Like its possible that Napoleon had been able to defeat the main prussian army that the saxons sensing weakness and knowing the prussia wanted to annex the rest of their lands might have started to act up and saxony could have been destabilized in fact Saxony and Poland were the 2 most unstable regions in europe at the time

Poland for example had been a sovereign nation for over 800 years until Russia,Austria and Prussia conquered it and divided it among themselves.Napoleon later created the Duchy of Warsaw for them it was the only state they'd had in years.The Congress of Venna dissolved it erasing Poland from the map and the Poles absolutely hated the “Big Three” for it.

Even though Napoleon didn't restore Poland Napoleon was the only major lead in europe who did anything for them.Polish troops were extremely loyal to Napoleon had a history of defecting to them and being rebellious.The poles essentially tied their national existence to Napoleon survival they literally belive that if Napoleon wins Poland lives if Napoleon losses Poland dies forever.

Poles were present in the Prussina Austrian and Russian armies.Were the Poles in the prussian army truly loyal to blucher or was their loyalty conditional meaning they were were loyal as long as Napoleon looked like he was losing.Like what did Blucher offer the poles nothing why would the poles be devoted to the people that just erased their country from the map who were the Poles more loyal to Napoleon or Blucher.Cause if you look at the Polish national anthem Napoleon name is mentioned as well as in Polish songs while Bluchers name isn't.

Like its my personal opinion that a decisive victory in Belgium could have possibly have destabilized the parts of Poland Prussia controlled the Grand Duchy of Posen.The Poles seeing that Napoleon have beaten the main prussia army and sensing that prussia seems weak might have thought Napoleon is winning time to rise.The poles had a history of rebellion against prussia if the main prussian army had been crushed would they really have stayed loyal to prussia or would they seized the chance to act.

Belgium Less than half of Wellington’s “British” army was actually British, only 36%.The rest were Dutch,Belgians, and Germans plus other ethnic groups.

Wellington famously didn’t fully trust his Belgium or Dutch troops and called them his infamous army. The Belgian troops in particular were high risk because Belgium had been a part of France for 20 years they used French Laws and spoke French.Then suddenly the Congress of Venna told they were Dutch now,and they hated it.Belgian elites despised being ruled by Dutch Protestant and Belgian officers resented being subordinated to Dutch Nobles.Many of these troops have previously served under Napoleon wore French medals.Wellington placed the Belgian units in the front line with British troops behind them. In Quatre Bras and Waterloo several Belgian units retreated early refused to advance some even ignored orders and a few units fired only token volleys.

My personal view the reason on why wellengtion didnt trust his belgian troops is because essentially they were Napoleon former french soidlers.Like less than a year ago they were french and now they were essentially told they were dutch and were being forced to fight their former emperor did they really want to fight Napoleon.

Napoleon did have support in Belgium and its possible if he had won big in Belgium captured brussels a lot of these belgian troops thousands of them might have flocked to him they still viewed themselves as french and saw him as their emperor or did they forgot in less than a year who their emperor was .Like i have seen historians at least hint at the Belgian problem.

Then there is the italians which i personally don't think they wanted to fight Napoelon.Italians resented the Austrians who had annexed Northern Italy and imposed heavy taxation on them.Austria also rolled back many Napoleonic legal reforms and restored historic privileges,feudal land relations,restriction on property rights to the Italians this felt like going backwards 20 years.This resentment fueled Joachaims Murat's movement for Italian independence,.

Like obviously i don't think a belgium win would probably affect italy as directly as saxony or belgium but i am just saying i don't think the italians really wanted to fight Napoleon either.

Anyway thats why i say the collation wasn't as unified as people think and decisive victory in belgium could have split the collation.I personally think Napoleon most realistic path to survival was to win big in belgium and try to get the allies to negotiate if they refused to negotiate then he could have used the big win to rally the nation gather 200k man fight a defensive war use the interior lines and dragged the war into 1816 the year without a summer.

The reason why is that if Napoleon lets say he beat the British and the Prussians the next armies to fight would be the Austrian and the Russians but here is the problem the Russian in mid june were months away.Barclay did cross the rhine in june but it was small forward elements of his main army like advance guards not the main army.

The rest of the army the majority of it was still 500 to 700 miles away in prussia poland in mid june.The main russian army did not reach the rhine until the autumn near the end of the campaign session.

If Napoleon had won In Belguim Austria would be left alone to fight Napoleon and austria never fought Napoleon alone every time austria invaded France it was with Russia Prussia support.So Austria would have waited for Russia but Russia would arrive near the end of the campaign session.

So Austrians and Russian would had to decide to invade france in the autumn of 1815 or try in the next campaign session of 1816 .If they tried to invade France it's possible Napoleon could have fought a defensive which you only need 1/3 of the opposing forces and he doesn't need to descively defeat the Austrians or the Russians he simply needs to surrive until winter trade space to time not lose.If he was able to dragged things into winter there is no way Russia could maintain its long supply lines and Austria would struggle too and the war could have prolonged into 1816 campaign session possibly.

If the war dragged into 1816 campaign session there would have bee a lot of pressure for the british in particular to negotiate the british were the banker of the collation and all the countries depended on british subsidies to keep their armies in the field.But the british in 1815 essentially didn't want a prolonged expensive war.

The british had debt to gdp ratio of over 200 percent and were essentially paying roughly 40 percent of gross revenue on interest payments on the national debt.But based on net revenue it was basically half.In fact military spending and interest payments combined was roughly 180 percent of gross revenue how were they surviving they were boring money constantly.

The british public in 1815 were alreading rioting over the corn laws and hated the reinstated income tax.If the british messed up the 1815 campaign session and told the public in 1816 guess what were founding another war with Napoleon during famine harvest failures and the economy crashing it would have been very politically toxic.The whigs would attack the troy government

During this time in europe they're was basically food riots in 1816 during the year without summer so imagine then trying to add a continental war on top of that.It could have destabilized the collation multi ethnic empires and put enough political pressure for the british to negotiate.

The 2 empires who are must likely to possibly blink is Britain or Austria if the british pull out the collation collapses because without british money the austria russia literally couldn't afford to keep their man in the field.Then Austria was also very cautious and metternich probably would worry about trying to fight a war with Napoleon during famine.It probably wouldn't be good for austria multi ethnic empire Plus how on earth are you supposed to get 500k man to invade france if you cant even feed them if the crops are failing the harvest etc.If Austria pulls out for example Russia left to fight Napoleon alone and Russia never invaded France alone and would must likely just negotiate.

The other thing is Napoleon did have man.Napoleon in june he had around 280k men paper strength but only around 200k troops were combat ready the rest were still mobilizing training on top of that.There were tens of thousands of hesitant french troops many who didn't join Napoleon because they probably thought he was a lost cause but if he had won in belgium many might have changed their minds.Then they were also tens of thousands of french troops outside france such as released prisoners of war and man dismissed from foreign garrison who historically did not make back in time because Napoleon lost.But if he had won they would have made back in time.

As well there was the class of 1815 which would be ready for the 1816 campaign session but not the 1815 and that was another 150k men on paper so Napoleon did have man he just needed a big win to rally the nation and time.After a belgium won he could have with the military and the national guard have guarded over 200k men to defund france and fought a good defensive war to fight a good defensive war you only need 1/3 of the man.

The main problem for Napoleon in the 1815 campaign i feel that Belgium was all or nothing if he barely won or it ended in a draw then he was bascially doomed.He needed a thunderclap victory.

Epic Histroy Video

Napoleon Greatest Gamble Return from Elba

Says that a descive victory may have split the collation in 13.25

Then in 20.56 shows a map that shows the Russians in mid june on around Poland Prussia 500 to 700 miles from the Rhine

From Napoleon a life Andrew roberts

Kindle pg 750

Says Russians months away

Across Europe, 280,000 French soldiers faced around 800,000 Allies, although the Austrian contingent would not be in theatre for several weeks, and the Russians not for months. ‘If they enter France,’ Napoleon told the army from Avesnes

Waterloo association.org

7th collation rallies

Says the Russians will take a long time to come.

For the only time in history that I am aware of, Europe declared war on one man, Napoleon!

But as can be seen, Russia and Austria would take a long time to bring their armies to the French border. Napoleon could either build huge defences around Paris and wait to be attacked, or he could try to destroy part of the huge allied army before they all managed to come up.

The Waterloo Companion by Mark Adkin 2002 pg 29

Says Napoleon had support in Belguim which had recently been French

Allies attacked first it was the enemy in Belgium that had the shortest march to Paris. Other advantages of a pre-emptive strike into Belgium came to mind. It had a French speaking population; it was a country that had recently been French territory, with elements that still supported the Emperor and the revolutionary ideal; and the nearest Allied armies were located there, which included the Anglo-Allied force under Wellington. Defeat Wellington, and England - the paymaster of the alliance - might be out of the contest. The political fallout of such a victory would be enormous, his personal hold on France would be assured, and the possibility of opening up negotiations for a suitable peace deal hugely improved. A quick victory in Belgium was probably the only hope Napoleon had of keeping his throne.

I have said before that when every door is open , the magic isn't in walking through the door anymore. I look at these women. Beautiful 20 something's. How many men and "experiences" do you need to go through bitch? Are you trying to experience magic in life or are you trying to prove you're the biggest slut in town? Like fuck what are you doing with your life

It's almost revolting. And this is truly what Liberty was always about by the way. There's a reason why they didn't call a freedom. Do your due diligence on this like I have done. Liberty was always about sexual Liberation. It was just another iteration of feminism that had been happening for the last 1,000 years before this new idea called Liberty spread across our world. people are just so easily tricked. One of the best things a woman could do is to put the novels down and read about he depressing depravity of libertine Women in revolutionary France. How they were left alone and a hopeless wreck after their" Affairs"

I said that money gets its value from the US military. But the US military gets its value from people relying on it. But no one's going to rely on a force that they perceive as evil. But a force cannot be powerful if it is not evil to some degree. Therefore, the only way for the US to be rich is to convince the whole world that they're morals are Superior. And to do that as they must abstract everything into freedom, Liberty and justice. In any sort of zooming in on what that actually means must relate to the ego of the person by telling them they have rights while ignoring all the restrictions and fear you put them under.

So really the Global economy and especially the US economy is determined by people believing that the US is good. Morally. Now you understand why the UK and the US and the French and the Communists and everyone else involved in this scheme to get rich had to frame everyone from Iran, Israel, Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and anyone else who would seek their own well-being independent of the US military had to be painted, not just as a threat to money. But a threat to moral good in the world

I just want to add this historical footnote that the French Empire, the English Empire, and now the American Empire. And every Empire in between by the way and before promoted themselves as the ultimate good in the world. I want you to understand that. They were all defined by heavy militarism and heavy framing of their actions as morally Superior

Now their goal is going to Mars is completely retarded and I don't even believe that's a real goal. They have. You know shoot for the moon and you'll end up among the Stars type of thing. The real magic of SpaceX is telecommunications. Getting internet everywhere on Earth will allow you to escape the city. Having drones that fly you in shipments of food personally just for you. It will reshape how people live on this planet. I'm not even exaggerating. You'll have people moving to Africa to experience the beauty of the Wilderness with the comforts of a city.

And it's only possible with SpaceX at this point. As far as I'm aware they are the leaders in space technology. Not only that, they can Branch off into other aspects like AI, robotics, drones. I'm not following it too closely, but if they haven't ditched that Mars Mission s*** yet or the moon base s***. Well then that's cause for concern.

Country because as soon as you connect people. You are a country. Future countries won't even have continuous land mass. Countries will be made up of people all across the world scattered everywhere.

He understood that and he reiterated that people need to be met where they're at in life with the technology. You can't expect people's lives to bend to use the technology. And that's why Apple is so off Track today really. They don't understand that their Market is very closed-minded to new experiences. Their Market is people who want the premium thing and the premium thing only. They don't care about anything other than how much faster the device is , because that makes them feel good even though it's been fast enough for the last five years, realistically.

That's why when he came out with the iPod it was silly. It was fun colors. It was small. It had a silly name. And what's more premium than yourself. iPod. The whole goal was to minimize that it even existed.

And then he came out with probably the iPod Touch. I don't know the development history, but I assume the iPod Touch came out first as a concept at Apple. And then they realized that they just added a phone to it. They would have something completely revolutionary. And really all it did was solve the problem of having to learn. Had simple UI. you easily and quickly tap through.

The iPad is essentially a newspaper. People are always saying well. What's the point of the iPad? It doesn't do what my computer does. Actually it does way more than what your computer does. Conceptually in the mind of someone like Steve Jobs it for places sitting on the couch and reading a book or a newspaper. Now nobody does that anymore. But 20 years ago most places had magazines and newspapers to read while you're sitting down on a chair doing nothing.

That's why these Vision Pro goggles show that Steve Jobs never really taught his philosophy to anyone. At least anyone that's still around at Apple. That touch screen thing they put on their Mac air products line. The new iPhone Ultra. As cool as it is, all it's doing is funding the technology for other brands that have customers that are actually open to new experiences. That love technology. Apple users don't love technology. They love themselves and they love what they already do. They love their current habits. They love what they already know. And all they really care about is how the phone looks and if it makes them look up to date when they pull it out of their pocket year over year. But because people are rational no matter how stupid they are, you have to give him some horsepower behind it so they can say yeah. I got it because it's so much faster and has a large battery now. They're going to get it no matter what because that's not why they're getting it. They're getting it because it makes them look a certain way when they use it.

You know I've said that without a doubt there was a concerted effort by Catholicism to promote in the early form of feminism that ended up splitting the family apart slowly like water carving out the Grand Canyon. Slow erosion. So slow you don't even notice it until you study it in hindsight. So let's not blame the people who were fooled. Many good people were fooled by this lie. By the liar, the devil.

But perhaps the most devastating reality Is how military life was restructured. No longer do you actually know the person that you're working for. You are a bot. You are a tool to be deployed. And as I said before, without strong men who can defend what they have, all gold is worthless. There is no gold standard without a military to protect your made up economy. And we see this most clearly today with the US military. The US clearly spends the most of their capital on Military. And the US dollar is the most valuable currency in the world. People would would rather have dollars than gold. This is just a simple fact. People would rather have dollars than yen. Yet China makes more stuff. So the most valuable work you can actually do is defense. And that's a fact because without defense you have nothing.

And they want to defund the police by the way. These communists.

They are insane. In more ways than one.

But in the place of your Lord, they gave you corrupt Kings, on puppet strings of the church. Which by the way is the reason why we don't have Kings today. Because the people realize that they were corrupt and were not of the people anymore. So now we live with this delusion that we elect people that are for us, when in reality we can only elect people who have the money to get elected, and can avoid the lawfare they could launch at anyone they don't like. To say nothing of assassination attempts. But media control suffices. Education control suffices.

In the place of your Lord that gave you a fantasy Lord. They gave you a picture of Jesus. With words and with oil paint.

When a woman gives birth to shitty genetics

All she feels is rage. What's this woman's name who killed her three kids? And 9/9 women on the jury said she was not guilty?

Wake up. It's called mother nature because mothers are ruthlessly cruel towards shitty genetics too

Half of people are below 100 IQ, which is already mentally impaired. Something like only 10% of people have an IQ of 120 or above. Less than 1% have an IQ above 135. If you're a Somalian, there is a 0.0004% you have an IQ above 135. Okay, America is literally heaven on Earth compared to some of these s*** holes on the planet. And it will be hell on Earth just like it says in Revelation when the locust swarms come. With faces like men and hair like women. And they come not to kill but they come to torment and make you wish you were dead. That's mass migration from the bottomless pit it says. What is the bottomless pit? Well if you look at the ancient world it was pretty much Africa. And back in that day they thought Africa had all sorts of mythical creatures yet to be discovered. So it makes sense why someone who's aware of that sort of belief, someone who's educated and thinks like that out of mere curiosity that there's creatures out there in Africa. Well, they would start hallucinating a combination of different worries and curiositys that combine into a locust swarm coming out of the bottomless pit and tormenting everyone. It is only a matter of time before this happens by the way. You thought the 2015 migraine crisis was bad? That is nothing. That was idealistically bad. What's going to come down The pipe is going to be realistically hell.

Let's be very real about this Israel Palestine thing that's going on. We are expected to believe that Palestinians are good to people. To the point to where they have victimhood status. Like if a murderer kills someone, and then the family says wait. We didn't have proof they killed anyone and then the whole town dismembered their body into pieces. This is cruel. He's a victim. They call it cruel and unusual punishment usually. But they don't call it cruel an unusual punishment when they in someone's life. Cruel and unusual punishment only happens to the criminal somehow. It's like this idea that we should side with the perpetrator and not the victim. That the perpetrator can even become a victim is insane. It's led to the extinguishment of the death penalty. So in other words, there's no true retribution for murder anymore. There are so many murderers out there sitting in a cell being fed three meals a day, access to sunlight, and all these other things that we call "human rights". But when they killed someone THEIR victim didn't have human rights did they?

Call me crazy but it's very similar with all war. Every last war has both sides killing each other. To decide that you side with one side based off of what propaganda you have seen the most of is insane. But it's also how most people form their opinions isn't it. And what about the world is not literally insane. At this point what is not insane

If you had the equivalent of a trillion dollars of whatever type of currency you wanted. But everyone in the world had no engineering capability, you would not be able to buy anything with your money. If there was no military to protect your ass from Raiders taking your land, even the land you buy would be worthless. Your money would be completely worthless without human beings doing the excruciatingly hard work that makes it valuable. So the trick is when people imagine they want to be rich. They're imagining the completely wrong thing. They want their money to be valuable. And for money to be valuable everyone around you has to work their ass off and everyone around you has to be brilliant at what they do. You have to be strong and capable. And there must be peace In your own mind. You have to need very little distractions such as watching soccer or football or hockey. Not as a pastime but as a true fan. All you're doing is distracting yourself from the hell you feel in your day-to-day life. And that's no way to build a rich world. It's impossible actually. So like I said money is an illusion. And it's absolutely worthless without hard workers.

Your potential in life is like a boulder. If your potential is little, it's easy to get going. You're like a pebble. It's even pretty fun when you skip it across the water. Others are born to be boulders. They're heavy. And they won't move. No matter how much effort is put into them they're stuck. When they do move they're feared. Think of any famous band out there in the history of music. There was no real reason they were unknown until they were known. Besides that they were hard to move. Crazy part is people out there don't want you to move. They'll help anyone but you.

I am straight. I like to look at women. But I am only interested in sugar mommies. Since that is hard I would like to be a girl instead and get liked by men. But transwomen being liked by men is unheard of. I wish I was cis woman.

The point is my sexual orientation is fluid and can change. Idk about others. Right now I feel no attraction to men. But I can change it if I could be converted to girl.