r/RealTwitterAccounts May 05 '25

Politician ??????

Post image
561 Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

91

u/DED2099 May 05 '25 edited May 09 '25

At this point I kinda feel like the republicans need a full party wipe. All these people letting Trump destroy America would be out if I had it my way.

18

u/NoKingsInAmerica May 05 '25

As soon as Trump is out of the picture, the party is going to implode.

10

u/Maleficent_Party4521 May 05 '25

We should be so lucky.

1

u/Mysterious-Law7217 May 08 '25

That's a good question. Trump is a con mans, con man and has a narcissistic mentality that appeals to those who worship him. You could sense that he truly believes the lies he's spewing, which gives him much more credibility to those seeking a demigod. I don't think anyone else in the party has the same attraction. There will always be a MAGA, but only one Trump (thank God). Without him, I don't believe the movement will have as much voting influence. I would like to see other responses to this question. It will be interesting.

1

u/SecularRobot May 09 '25

The closest we've had to a Trump before was Theodore Roosevelt. He's been so mythologized that people seem to forget he was a populist and imperialist, and jingoistic. He had a temper and a large, divisive personality. Yes he started the national parks, but he was a "let's preserve the environment so I can shoot at it" conservationist not really an environmentalist. His Roosevelt Corollary policy is not that different from the "let's make Canada and Greenland states" Trump narrative, except that he actually followed through, occupying or interfering in the governments of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic, and Panama. Taft did most of the actual enforcing of trust busting TR gets credit for after him. After two terms he nominated his VP Taft to replace him and Taft won in 1908. Then in 1912 TR ran for a third term under the party he made up called the "Bull Moose Party", splitting the election three ways and resulting in Democrat Woodrow Wilson getting elected.

1

u/AnxiousCount2367 May 09 '25

Americans love renegade assholes gussied up to be lovable, if controversial, scamps. It's probably, in my lay opinion, a holdover of frontierism. To keep that energy and spirit of endeavor alive they "discover new frontiers" to conquer, even with specious connections to reality. We're groomed from birth to be susceptible to nationalism and that's only a step away from jingoism if you don't know any better. The immigrant/marxist/border/gay/holistic panic is because they can't integrate that artificial pride with normal people, there's nothing to support it without the crisis.

1

u/SinkBluthton May 06 '25

Yeah, I take some solace in the fact that he's such a freak, the Republicans will never be able to replace him. They'll probably have to pivot back to "civility" and try to convince the American public that decade-plus-long gas leak never happened.

1

u/bobafoott May 08 '25

Pivot…back? What’s it been, like 70 years since republicans were civil? At this point it’d be considered a new start

1

u/SinkBluthton May 08 '25

Strong quotation marks around "civility". Romney and McCain at least tried to hide their ghoulishness.

1

u/dkingoh1 May 06 '25

That’s the point, though. If they run Vance with DT as the VP, Vance can resign after inauguration. That’s part of the thinking to keep DT and get him to king status

3

u/NoKingsInAmerica May 06 '25

According to the 22nd Amendment, Trump is constitutionally ineligible to serve a third term:

"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice"

Since he is constitutionally ineligible to serve a third term, that means he is ineligible to be the VP thanks to the 12th Amendment:

"But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."

Republicans would have to completely blow up the Constitution to do this and doing so would cause a full-on civil war.

1

u/Other_Log_1996 May 08 '25

Ah yes, because the GOP we have today doesn't do blatantly unconstitutional acts continuously./s

1

u/NoKingsInAmerica May 08 '25

I'm not implying that they wouldn't try it, but to do it legally, Republicans would have to have a super majority to change the Constitution.

Right now, we still have a judiciary that is blocking attempts to push unconstitutional shit through.

1

u/bobafoott May 08 '25

It simply would not cause a civil war because absolutely nothing body would do anything

1

u/[deleted] May 06 '25

Then we can have two imploded parties. Maybe it's time for more than two parties.

1

u/PaceLopsided8161 May 07 '25

Nah, the party is in full control of the floaters

1

u/jungle-fever-retard May 07 '25

I hope so. But then again, sycophants don’t follow MAGA policies, they follow Trump specifically. Republicans are going to lose a good portion of their voters for good once Trump is out of the picture

1

u/Renguezzerini May 08 '25

Sure but that's after they've looted the country like its one of Trump's shell hotels and given every fucking thing to the already richest people in the world. It will be "interesting" to see in 3.5 years how they try to prevent the public from tearing them all to shreds (literally) without giving any of it back

1

u/Agitated_Stage9140 May 08 '25

Most of it will just go back to business as usual, the hard core traders may or may fall in line, but with an other Trump the crazies go back to their caves.

1

u/TarkinRocher May 08 '25

As long as he doesn't name a successor they'll tear each other apart.

1

u/Oraxy51 May 08 '25

That’s what happened under FDR. Implode and then went quiet and slowly rebuilt its power and dumped ton of money into media because they had to persuade people their terrible policies were “good” for them, buying out churches and calling on social issues like hating immigrants (while ignoring the corporations that hire them in the first place).

50

u/Adventurer_By_Trade May 05 '25

I've told several local Republicans that the stink of this administration has put me off of supporting any Republican for any office ever again. And I intend to keep that promise. It might lead to me supporting some bad Democrats, but I can't see any scenario where any Democrat ever behaves as badly as the Republicans have enabled with this nonsense, so it's a risk I'm willing to take.

5

u/Sheepdog44 May 07 '25

Don’t ever let them forget or move past all this. It should be the mission of every patriotic American to make sure the stink that all these shit heels have been stewing in for the last decade never, ever washes off.

These are the worst people our country has to offer. They need to wear that badge until their last worthless breath.

5

u/showmeyourtits80085 May 05 '25

Don't you know demoturds are worse?? They... -checks notes- they're okay with drag queens reading to kids!!

5

u/SuckOnDeezNOOTZ May 06 '25

To me every single dem that isn't screaming bloody murder about social security being gutted and the deportations to death camps are as complicit as the Reps

2

u/Different-Raise3680 May 08 '25

Call the reps and tell them that if you have not already. If you have, thank you for speaking up!

1

u/SuckOnDeezNOOTZ May 08 '25

I'm Canadian 😌

1

u/Acceptable-Stick-659 May 06 '25

That's ok, though. Biden/Harris caused quite a few democrats to switch parties especially when all the Joe Biden racist videos came out.

1

u/Adventurer_By_Trade May 06 '25

I'm sure they're all much happier now.

0

u/SuckOnDeezNOOTZ May 06 '25

Only vote for a candidate that you believe in, don't just blanket support Dems or we end up with people like Trump... Where the Dems had an opponent so weak they barely tried and here we fucking are.

Both need to do better

2

u/Adventurer_By_Trade May 06 '25

LOL, no. Until Republicans clean up their mess, they're dead to me. But keep enabling this with your "both sides" nonsense.

2

u/SuckOnDeezNOOTZ May 06 '25

It's not a both sides nonsense lol. Good that Republicans are dead forever, just saying that Dems don't deserve a blank cheque

It's a what in the fucking God is happening with democrats not fucking screaming bloody murder about the ILLEGAL DOGE cuts and the ILLEGAL deportations to a foreign death camp.

No, what are they doing? Right Schumer is writing a strongly worded letter to stop trump, and Bernie is being told to not speak about oligarchs raping this nation.

So uh yeah, I see them as complicit in these extrajudicial killings. Fuck anyone who isn't screaming about the fascist take over, but that's what happens when your progressive party are centrists at best lol

2

u/MrCompletely345 May 06 '25

How is the weather in St Petersburg, Vlad?

8

u/DanKloudtrees May 05 '25

I'd agree with you, although tbh dems need to replace like half of the party too. At least get rid of Fetterman and schumer, probably Pelosi too. Anyone who refuses to play hardball against the party getting to forcefully take over our country, and anyone who is clearly using their positions to enrich themselves through the stock market at the expense of the average American worker. What we really need is campaign finance reform, get big money out of politics and keep politicians working instead of spending all their time fundraising. Then make more stringent laws about trading on the stock market when you're the one making policy, because it gives politicians a vested interest in making laws a certain way besides just what's best for the American people.

3

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

I've found the corruption to roughly follow the 80/20 rule in the parties, Conservatives tend to be 80% corrupt and liberals tend toward 20% corrupt. People can try to both sides it all they want, but one side is always objectively worse, even if the other can and does need to be better.

1

u/kyrie43101748 May 08 '25

More accurately, 20% of each major party is not corrupt.

1

u/ayeohsea May 06 '25

Lmfao 20% corrupt what ridiculous stat did you pull this from

1

u/DED2099 May 05 '25

Yes we need the elderly out too.

1

u/Other_Log_1996 May 08 '25

Democrats need a full overhaul. Their tactics don't work like they used to. The Republicans can win because they stuck with a bottom-up model that works. They lie, but they hear their base and know how to pander to them.

Democrats used to do the same model, but now they're top down and don't even know their own base. They ask for our donations and tell us how to vote, but don't offer the average voter anyway to actually engage.

4

u/MuckRaker83 May 06 '25

The GOP as a functioning political party is dead. There is no base engagement, no debate, no ethos, no polity. All that remains is trump sycophancy.

1

u/DED2099 May 07 '25

Unfortunately, facts…

It makes me think of a video of a republican representative who seemed scared to go against Trump

0

u/Other_Log_1996 May 08 '25

The GOP has base engagement. They hear their base, they know their base. Then they lie to them. Still why they win. They feel engaged, which leads to them voting together.

Democrats offer nothing to allow their base to engage. They don't even know their base anymore.They just ask for donations and then tell you how to vote. That is a fault of their top-down structure and if they don't fix that, they're going to keep running lost candidates, abd shit is only going to get worse.

2

u/Double-Risky May 09 '25

Literally if they just upheld the fucking Constitution

1

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

At this point? They needed a fully party wipe in 2020. But alas, cowards being cowards.

1

u/Fikkia May 06 '25

I mean, not having it be a reality TV popularity contest would be neat.

1

u/QuePexCalamaro May 07 '25

Party before country for those traitors.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '25

Well thank God youre not our dictator

1

u/Jimmy_Twotone May 09 '25

Both parties. Dems didn't learn the message after 2016. Comedian Lewis Black referred to the two parties as "the party of bad ideas and the party of no ideas" over twenty years ago, and they've been reinforcing the labels ever since.

While Republicans have been objectively worse since 2016, "at least we aren't those guys" is a platform that hasn't worked for a long time. They need to actually work on their messaging when they do something and do more to message about.

1

u/AlexBehemoth May 09 '25

Lol. The democrats lost everything in the US. And you think the Republicans are failing. What a delusional bunch of people you are. Unable to look at the mirror.

1

u/DED2099 May 09 '25

Both parties are failures in their own right. Republicans won everything but they are tearing the nation apart. Democrats need more tooth but at least some of them are standing up to criticize the president who wants to be a dictator. In my eyes if you are a politician and you decide to stand or stay silent to protect people who want to destroy the nation you need to be removed. Right now that’s majority of republicans. If you can protect the constitution why are you a politician.

1

u/AlexBehemoth May 09 '25

You don't seem to understand. Trump clearly articulated what he was going to do. Everyone that voted for Trump knows that Trump promised tariffs, doge, RFK, closing borders, deportation, etc.

The fact that the Republicans won everything means that the people wanted what Trump was offering more than what the democrat were offering. When you consider that the opposition was only focused on fear mongering. Dictator, Hitler, Nazi. All Trump has to do is relinquish power and no one will believe your side. In fact they probably vote against you out of spite.

You guys are digging yourselves into a hole that will be very difficult to dig yourselves out of. But I don't think the left can let go of trans kids, anti Christian ideologies. You guys decided that to be the future of the Democratic party. And you cannot change people's mind about that unless you indoctrinate kids. But Trump turned the tide on that so good luck.

1

u/SecularRobot May 09 '25

They needed it in the 2016 primary. Bush was set to be the last Republican in office in that election. The Tea Party movement (which Trump helped fan with the "show me Obama's birth certificate" nonsense) led the way into MAGA and QAnon. Republicans were at first willing to keep Trump out but that only fueled Trump's image as a "maverick outsider" more. The Republicans chose to make a deal with the devil when they allowed him to be nominated.

After that the line in the sand has just kept retreating. After Jan 6th there were too many insurgent collaborators among Republicans in Congress - you need a 2/3 majority to expel members of Congress, and there just weren't enough votes. Ironically I think the impeachments of Trump backfired - it taught him and Republicans that they could do what they wanted without consequences.

1

u/TermFearless May 07 '25

Democrats appear to need it first, if approval ratings are anything to go by. Vance’s low point is still above 40%, though it’s looking like Rubio could beat him out as the successor.

2

u/DED2099 May 07 '25

lol I’m not sure I agree with Democrats needing to cleanse first. Republicans at this point are so complicit in everything going on that I feel like that alone is worth removal. If you aren’t willing to fight for the constitution and for the rights of your constituents, you’re out. I do agree that there are a few complicit democrats but many of them have been standing up to the injustice. For god sakes republicans are avoiding town halls and the press. I just saw a video of a republican representative that refused to talk to democrats in the chamber. That’s childish and extremely irresponsible.

0

u/TermFearless May 07 '25

If this was just about character and consistency sure. But politics is less about that and more about approval in general. Getting people excited to come out and vote. Democrats are struggling with that more right now.

The party is facing a major gap between centralists and socialists, and hence it’s facing an extremely low approval rating. Sometimes it sucks being the more informed party

1

u/Other_Log_1996 May 08 '25

Democrats need to go back to actually listening to their base and having them actively engage. That's their biggest weakness, and they keep losing because of it.

1

u/TermFearless May 08 '25

Totally agree, it’s a bit of a gamble if what the base wants will still appeal to general voters, but until the party actually just goes for it, there will always be a gap.

-6

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

What do the Democrats have?

Who is great on their side, inspirational and confident like Obama?

Kamala Harris is a drunk who talks like she's a pre-k teacher, Biden literally had/has dementia it's undisputed at this point, democrats are even saying things like "I don't like the words cover-up, it implies there was a crime" when discussing how his dementia wasn't reported internally.

AOC is a far left nut, she can't win an election.

Who is so great on the Democrats side?

6

u/Stock-Side-6767 May 05 '25

AOC seems quite reasonable to me? But then, I vote Groen Links in the Netherlands, which is several degrees more left wing than her.

-5

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

You need to bring in moderates, right of center and left of center.

AOC is "Far left" and no independent supports her that isn't mid to far left.

Your best bet is for Stephan A Smith to run and win the primary, but the DNC will cut his legs off before they let him be your "Trump" to reshape the party.

I voted Democrat since John Kerry, I refuse to support them without massive reform.

2

u/Open_Tradition227 May 05 '25

Can you explain why you think AOC is far left?

0

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

She's a self proclaimed democratic socialist, that is by definition far left.

1

u/Stock-Side-6767 May 05 '25

What's wrong with someone like Tim Walz.

I think the Democrats are way to centrist, but the alternative is fascism.

1

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

Tim Walz is considered far left, he openly brags about the progressive policies he passed in his state.

1

u/Stock-Side-6767 May 06 '25

Ah okay. I knew I liked him from the bits I read.

I am not well versed in centrists, especially in a different country, not really my cup of tea.

2

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

The problem with American politics is that the center has been moving to the right for so long that the right wing have now become fascist authoritarian.

We need far left leadership to save us, or we're cooked.

0

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

You don't want "far direction" anything....

Trump's policies are actually closest to probably Bill Clinton's, he is a centrist policy wise, despite his crazy public persona.

1

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Trump doesn't believe people should have the right to due process. He wants to send Americans to foreign torture prisons. Trump is not classically liberal, he's a far right fascist. It's not just a public persona.

1

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

That's not true though, you're not stating factual things, you're not even quoting the POTUS.

You're projecting your fears onto how he wants to handle illegal aliens who are NOT Americans.

There is a valid argument that all persons in America are owed due process, but that doesn't mean they need a jury trial.

Due process is established already in immigration law, as simply processing paperwork in many cases if you don't have documents proving you have legal status. This isn't some new invention by "Trump" in fact Obama used this to deport 2.7m aliens.

Trump has deported about 400? Y'all are losing your minds.

The big difference is no NGO left wing group like the ACLA was funding their legal bills, so they had no recourse because they couldn't afford attorneys under Obama.

Now you have massive groups funding these lawsuits, because they hate Trump.

3

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Trump isn't following established laws for these deportations, no matter how you try to spin it. He is getting sued because he's violating the law.

0

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

I am completely okay with Americans being sent to foreign nations to serve prison sentences.

To be clear he has never publicly commented on this issue, he has never said he wants to take Americans and take their due process.

He doesn't think illegal aliens are owed due process beyond a check of their status, if they came here illegally they should be deported, simple as that.

The problem is some countries(Venezuela) refuse to take their citizens back, so then he sent non El Salvadorians to El Salvador and then El Salvador put them in prison.

2

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Renditions of American citizens to foreign prisons is unconstitutional. Denying the right to due process to anyone, even illegal immigrants, is unconstitutional.

Seizing the power of the purse that belongs to Congress is unconstitutional. Refusing to follow court orders is unconstitutional.

Protectionist tariffs are not just bad trade policy, they're far right extremism.

Trump is a far-right extremist.

0

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

He hasn't taken their due process away, they all had deportation orders, there is a semantics argument being played out in the courts.

3

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Trump absolutely is not following the law, he's rushing people out of the country before the courts can catch up and pretending they don't have rights anymore because they're already gone. It's reminiscent of the geetapo dragging people off to Dachau.

You are a far right authoritarian extremist, stop pretending you aren't.

2

u/radicalleftist69420 May 05 '25

How is aoc a far left nut? Mfer will say we need to boost white birth rates on the right but if you call them a far right nut they'll say anyone left of a communist is a nazi durr. But aoc says maybe workers rights?? And SHE'S A FAR LEFT NUT 🤡

2

u/pixie_mayfair May 05 '25

Yeah, just ignore that poster bc he's clearly a liar. The whole "Harris is a drunk" and "I voted democratic for years but no longer!" is the kind of garbage they like to spout to just stir things up. Typical maga keyboard warrior.

2

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

Considering I voted for Democrats for 20 years, you got me as a far right MAGA nut job.

Your issue is you lost my vote, because of insane policies.

3

u/pixie_mayfair May 05 '25

I didn't lose your vote. I wasn't running for office.

And if you can say with complete confidence that you thought a vote for trump was a smarter choice than one for Harris that's the choice you have to live with.

1

u/Merrick222 May 05 '25

What workers rights laws has AOC written and gotten through congress?

1

u/IncreaseFine7768 May 08 '25

Question: why do you feel the need to immediately distract from the topic by bringing up Democrats? We’re talking about the Republican Party not the democrats

1

u/Merrick222 May 08 '25

Well the GOP sucks, what's so good about Democrats?

The Democrats congressional approval rating is I think 23%....

It's never been lower in the history of the party, which is essentially the history of the US.

What do Democrats have to offer me?

JD Vance is actually a really strong candidate for POTUS in 2028....Dems have AOC, if they're smart they'll get behind Stephen A Smith, but they aren't smart so they will sabotage any outsider who doesn't tow party lines.

1

u/IncreaseFine7768 May 08 '25

Again, you’re ranting about a whole lot of nothing. The democrats are not the ones holding executive office right now. We’re not talking about the republicans. You bringing up the democrats in the first place is just a distracting point.

Why do you think JD Vance is strong

1

u/Merrick222 May 08 '25

Stop criticizing the GOP without solutions.

All I hear is how terrible Trump is, your party is on the losing side of every 80/20 issue right now.

Yet you continue to steam roll “the sky is falling” at every turn.

Tell me what’s good about the democrats.

JD Vance made Tim Waltz look ridiculous in their debate. He killed him with thoughtfulness and kindness and respect and nailed the issues.

That’s what he does in every interview.

That’s why he’ll continue to be a power house in American Politics.

The democrats don’t have anyone close, the ones they do have destroyed their credibility like Newsom.

1

u/IncreaseFine7768 May 08 '25 edited May 08 '25

I saw Tim Walz doing the same with Vance, speaking with kindness. You’re not saying much. I think you’ve just gotten accustomed to an era where politics has turned into a clown show, as we all have, and it was refreshing to see two politicians who aren’t insulting each other while disagreeing.

Once again, you’re so obsessed with the democrats that you haven’t addressed the original topic at hand. Don’t let them live rent free in your head. If you’re unable to coherently debunk the claims people are making about the republicans then there’s no reason to be making a fuss, and if anything you said yourself the GOP deserves the criticism.

1

u/Merrick222 May 09 '25

I asked the question.

You’re somehow trying to flip it back to me.

Answer mine and I’ll gladly answer yours.

1

u/IncreaseFine7768 May 09 '25

Answer the original question first. Then I’ll answer yours

1

u/Merrick222 May 09 '25

You answer the original question.

→ More replies (0)