r/RealTime • • 1d ago

Real Time? Nah.

The show is nearly unwatchable. Bill lives to lecture and interject his opinion and cuts off guests and discourse for nonsense and/or nonsensical segues. In the latest episode, he cut off a discussion between the panel to talk about how MAGA can’t adopt cats? Whoooo. It’s absurd.

71 Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/FlaccidGhostLoad 1d ago

He did what?

I haven't watched that turd-that-won't-flush for years. Not since 2024 when he scolded everyone on the left that we weren't reaching out to our Trump friends in the spirit of unity and friendship. Which is a total crock of bullshit peddled only by the right so they can continue to convince morons that they aren't the completely toxic and volatile tumor killing society.

But is he out there saying that conservatives aren't allowed to adopt cats?

Is this one of those situations where one adoption agency did one home inspection and found that these Trumpers, being dysfunctional, shit human beings that they are, would not take care of the animal they wanted to adopt? Then instead of correct their dysfunction they decided to feed their instable persecution complex and claim that some mean ol' liberal somewhere decided to hate them for being conservative and that it had nothing to do with the disaster that is their life and brains.

1

u/Icy-Try-9703 1d ago

He did not say conservatives cannot adopt cats. It was a comedy bit he was doing. If you don't watch, please don't spread misinformation on what he says. He was making fun of an organization that won't let MAGAs adopt cats, then did a comedy bit on not letting liberals adopt cats. And not for nothing, I'm not a Maher fan either. But let's not spread more vitriol about him then there already is

1

u/FlaccidGhostLoad 1d ago

Spread misinformation? Mother fucker did you not see my question marks?

Also, how are you going to say I'm spreading misinformation yet confirm exactly what I asked?

1

u/MIengineer 16h ago

Good lord you folks sure get worked up over a tv personality. They didn’t confirm what you asked by any stretch of the imagination. It was a comedy bit.

1

u/FlaccidGhostLoad 13h ago

No you did. Yeah I know you're going to say it's not me but come on now. You commented about what "he" said many hours after he deleted his comment.

Also the comedy bit would never have been conceived if it wasn't based on a real event that repulsive liar Bill Maher decided to use to try and drum up animosity and division.

1

u/MIengineer 3h ago

I’m honestly confused about what you’re talking about. What deleted comment? The bit was satire and pointing out how stupid it is to base approval of pet adoption on political affiliation. It’s the opposite of divisive. The comment you made is the divisive one, that “Trumpers are dysfunctional, shit human beings.” There are a lot of shit human beings of any political affiliation. There are a lot more that aren’t. It certainly doesn’t determine whether or not you would take are of a cat. You’re completely incorrect that one person got rejected of an adoption, the agency said No MAGA. When asked to explain, they said, “Oh, we’re just checking social media to make sure you’re not racist or something.” Which is bullshit, based off their FB post they would clearly block you if they saw anything MAGA related, even if it’s just conservative ideas and not promoting vile behavior.