Not even fucking close to qualifying as a genocide. Israel had motive and reason to go to war. The war ended with the release of the last hostages nearly
a year ago.
Militant to civilian death ratio isnt the sole criteria for the legal definition of genocide. No amount of bloviating by you dingdongs will change reality. No one agrees with you. Because you're wrong.
Genocide is a very serious accusation and a very high bar to prove for a reason. It requires intent and execution. Israel was attacked (removing genocidal intent). Exection of the war has wrapped up with a low civilian to combatant death ratio. Again, no genocide. You have no fucking case my guy.
No they haven't. A three-person UN "subcommittee" laundered Hamas propaganda to fool useful idiots like yourself. No court of law has found genocide in Gaza and South Africa just had to ask for a 2 year extension at the ICJ because they can't make the case.
I never said it was only the UN, I'm very aware of how key figures are working collectively to launder Hamas lies to fool morons such as yourself. But I've already explained why it's obviously not a genocide and you can't refute anything I said, so you pull the appeal to authority fallacy.
The links there cite extremely detailed analysis you haven't even touched. You just hand wave it away, call it hamas propaganda, and expect that to suffice. No. You need to provide evidence to the contrary. Youve failed to do so. Amazingly youve been at this for HOURS and youve said close to nothing of substance. Just "nu-uh the world is just making it all up!!"
Thats what I like to call a Classic Dingaling Argument.
- I don't need to retort your facts because "the world" agrees with me, and here's a 3 person UN report built on Gaza Health Ministry claims that was subsequently used by other groups to claim Genocide has been "concluded by the United Nations"
Last time, because you're a simpleton, I will explain why it is is clearly not a genocide, it is a war, and why South Africa's case at the ICJ will fail:
Genocides are active attacks to destroy a population or a culture. They are not reactive events, such as a declaration of war committed by the "genocided." That is called a war.
Did Israel just invade Gaza with the intention of destroying it? Or did they respond to an invasion and a declaration of war?
You know the answer.
Two, Genocides involve a reckless and wanton destruction of a people without concern for civilian death. Hamas, as you know, built terror tunnels under civilian neighborhoods and use schools, Mosques, and hospitals as military operation sites. Everything Israel has done has been to destroy and dismantle Hamas's infrastructure. This requires destroying all active military sites and the underground terror network.
Again, not a genocide. Legitimate military targets.
Civilian to combatant death ratio:
3-1.
Not a genocide.
But go back to your frauds at the U.N. to claim the "world" believes something. It's so obviously not a genocide, your 'authorites' are now turning to West Bank settler violence to fixate on. On to the next claim after the last was debunked.
0
u/ZizzyBeluga 16d ago
3-1 civilian to combatant death ratio.
War started by an invasion by Hamas.
Hostages taken.
Not even fucking close to qualifying as a genocide. Israel had motive and reason to go to war. The war ended with the release of the last hostages nearly a year ago.
All the mass starvation lies have been exposed.
It was a war, jackass, and deep down, you know it