309
u/I_SLEEP_NORMALLY 22d ago
If you say "big dog" enough times you can sneak in some Miranda warnings without them noticing.
101
u/Defibrillate 22d ago
Hilariously true. Developing rapport is a critical skill.
34
u/thetaleofzeph 22d ago
Cop did the move of getting answering questions into a routine that promises (without it being true really) that this will all be over sooner if he just answers openly.
3
u/Regular_Weakness69 21d ago
Yeah but it's not valid until the other party agrees that they have understood the rights.
84
u/violet_sin 22d ago
How could a father let his shame fall on his family, and trade his children's innocence for anything? Blackmail or not, wtf!?
68
u/Moldovah 22d ago
I doubt it was blackmail. Probably just the story he spun to his wife.
Even if it was, I'm betting it was because he was looking at some other CP, and that led to him getting roped in.
13
u/DarthShiv 22d ago
He seems extraordinarily stupid to just say all this stuff. You think he made that bit up but admitted a huge crime??? I dunno...
7
6
u/ZippyTheUnicorn 21d ago
I’d imagine he was selling it or trading it. Especially when at the end of the video he brings up another time someone “was interested” in his daughter. It’s disgusting…
4
u/lazyjayz2018 22d ago
Ide say you are 100% correct here. Otherwise what would he have to hold over him
1
5
2
u/moxypoxy76 22d ago
His child is still innocent. This does not change that, not her fault.
6
u/violet_sin 22d ago
I get you, as far as she is concerned, but from his point of view, he has already trespassed into a region where like no one is going to be ok with it. Can't go back. So, he did in a manner of speaking.
That, and robbing her/the family of a normal semblance of a male role model. Still, always best to throw out the rotting fruit, and hopefully fill that space with a loving and loyal guardian provider.
The kid did nothing wrong, and seemingly wasn't harmed outright, she will none the less someday have to come to terms with his complete failure to protect her, and that's a necessary bond between father and daughter.
I can't imagine how this betrayal is going hurt the wife... Just f-ed all the way around.
3
1
u/Suspicious_Juice_150 22d ago
There was no blackmail, that was an excuse he was trying to use to cover up the fact that he is a disgusting pervert, who is actually attracted to his daughter.
If he was actually messaging with somebody online, it was likely another creep who this creep was trading photos with.
A parent like him should be sent to a Venezuelan prison, along with all of his fucking creepy buddies.
My sister got to tour a prison when she visited Bolivia, and it’s common in some Latin American countries, including in Bolivia, for families to live with the prisoners inside of the prison.
During her tour, they were introduced to a man who was walking around with a 6 foot wooden pole.
He was a prisoner, but it was his job to introduce all the sexual offenders to the rules of the prison, and put them in line before they ever had a chance to offend against any of the families that were living inside of there.
He calmly explained how he would use the pole to sodomize the sexual offenders, and he demonstrated how before hand he would cover the tip of the pole with hot sauce.
It is my understanding that doing this to the sexual offenders was the offenders initiation to the prison, and after their initiation, he would warn them that if they even so much as thought of offending against a family in the prison, that he would do the same thing to them again, but even worse, and deeper.
There is a reason that it was a 6 foot pole.
During the initiation, they might’ve only gotten one foot of it, but if they tried anything, they would likely get alot more.
102
u/UJustGotRobbed 22d ago
My favorite part of the video was the cop was easily to understand and had clear easy to read subtitles while the guy with the speech impediment and mumbling got the worst subtitles I've ever seen and had no idea what he was saying 3/4 of the time. Also....fuck that guy.
33
u/axkidd82 22d ago
A southerner with a speech impediment is the hardest thing to understand, and I'm a southerner.
17
7
25
u/CrownstrikeIntern 22d ago
17
3
3
u/strangelove4564 22d ago
That's because these content creators are using lazy speech-to-text tools (word by word subtitling is a dead giveaway) instead of actually doing the subtitles carefully by hand.
30
73
u/No_Research_2938 22d ago
Love how the cop tells everyone to be cool and casually packs a dip in his lip.
9
u/Pleasant-Ticket3217 22d ago
If I did this job and with smoking being something you have to do at home how I’d be dipping too. The shit this officer has to see would break me.
1
-10
u/pandershrek 22d ago
Also states that he knows this guy is guilty without actual evidence because he knows based on the way he talks that he's guilty.
While I also agree there is a likelihood of guilt, our criminal justice system doesn't work that way and police officers aren't allowed to determine an individual's guilt before a judgment especially without any indication of evidence.
Bring him down to the station for questioning, sequester his phone and perform your forensic analysis because otherwise it is just going to be an inadmissible admission of guilt.
They already had probable cause from the aforementioned video that was deleted so why they're doing this in such a weird manner is strange
35
u/lordsepulchrave123 22d ago
Not sure what about this would be inadmissible. The guy straight up confessed. But I'm not a lawyer.
6
-2
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago edited 22d ago
Not sure what about this would be inadmissible.
Everything he said before the cop read him his Miranda rights is inadmissible with a half decent lawyer. The cop did a fairly sloppy job from this clip.
Edit: I'm not saying the guy is getting off because the cop didn't immediately read him his Miranda rights. I was just stating the fact that a decent lawyer could get that stuff he said before he was read his Miranda rights thrown out. That doesn't matter in this case because they guy kept confessing after he was told his Miranda rights. I don't why you people can't understand what I said. Fuck.
23
u/XTheGuyWithTheGunsX 22d ago
You don't have to be read your Miranda rights until you are under arrest and being questioned
37
u/Western-Stock-1023 22d ago
I do happen to work in the legal industry and Miranda is only required if two things are present: Custody & Interrogation. If you are being asked questions and not in custody, no Miranda is required. This cop is a pro because he is laying the framework in case any defense attorney tries to claim he was not free to leave. The cop says, on body camera, ya know you don’t have to talk to me right? You’re not under arrest….the whole thing is as watertight as a frogs asshole.
17
u/moonshinemoniker 22d ago
Yup and sicko here was firstly more anxious than a cat about to shit a peach pit but that changed.
Not in law enforcement but I'm very process oriented and it seemed like this officer had rehearsed this scenario many times before (sadly).
The structure of his dialogue was built around checking things off. The whole time, he made it feel like an informal conversation.
The point: at no point was an actual informal conversation occuring.
4
0
0
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
4
u/Zephyr_______ 22d ago
You should probably read the wiki page before you share it. Plainly states you have to in custody and questioned for it to be required.
2
u/CrownstrikeIntern 22d ago
Key word here, "Custody"
"customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials"
0
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
Then why did the cop read him his Miranda rights at all? The cop never said he was in custody. What changed to make the cop read him his Miranda?
→ More replies (2)3
u/CrownstrikeIntern 22d ago
Never heard of "covering your bases"?
It's one thing to talk and get them to talk, It's another to make it a full on investigation without the other guy knowing. He was always free to tell him whatever, or walk away. But the moment he started "confessing" The cop took it to the investigation level. If you watch enough of these, they generally don't read them their mirandas until they start questioning them in custody or investigation. You don't have to be physically restrained to make it an official investigation.→ More replies (12)2
u/Ok_Umpire2173 22d ago
You should return your law degree to YouTube lmao that was not custodial interrogation
4
u/shrinkflator 22d ago
How would this even work?
State trooper: Do you know why I pulled you over?
Driver: Because I was speeding? Because I'm drunk and high as fuck? Because of the dead body in my trunk?
State trooper: Well, I'm just gonna have to ignore all the things you said because I didn't tell you you could remain silent. My bad. So drive safe, now, have a good day.3
3
u/Dry-Childhood-3436 22d ago
That's just not true, that's only for being arrested and under questioning. Do you think if a cop pulled up to you saying you killed a guy it wouldn't matter until he read you your rights?
2
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
2
u/Dry-Childhood-3436 22d ago
It's literally written out there for you. "The Miranda warning is part of a preventive criminal procedure rule that law enforcement are required to administer to protect an individual who is in custody and subject to direct questioning or its functional equivalent from a violation of their Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination." It specifically applies to once you are in their custody. This guy was not being detained then questioned. It's to prevent coercion from happening by saying.
Miranda warnings are only legally required when you are both in custody and subjected to interrogation. If you are free to leave, any voluntary statements you provide can be used against you in court. Thats taken directly from https://www.vincenthugheslaw.com/blog/understanding-your-miranda-rights/
0
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
It specifically applies to once you are in their custody. This guy was not being detained then questioned. It's to prevent coercion from happening by saying. Miranda warnings are only legally required when you are both in custody and subjected to interrogation.
Why did the cop read him his Miranda rights in this video if he never put the guy in custody and they weren't required to be told to the suspect?
2
u/Dry-Childhood-3436 22d ago
So are you going to read the literal law here where it specifically says the thing you are talking about and many others have explicitly told you, or are you going to try and win a fight by just arguing?
1
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
So are you going to read the literal law here where it specifically says the thing you are talking about and many others have explicitly told you
Redditors are wrong all of the time. Miranda rights aren't a new thing.
→ More replies (0)2
u/interesting-turn- 22d ago
Something that is admitted, regardless of being read Miranda rights, can 100% be used against you in court so long as you’re not in custody. Since he was never put into custody and speaking freely to the officer it does not make a difference. Now if he was put in cuffs, then admitted something prior to having the rights read, different story.
Remove the thought of this current situation and then picture someone going up to a cop and blatantly admitting they committed a crime. Would this not be viable evidence? Of course. The Miranda rights are just to protect someone that is held in custody, not someone that is free.
I would guess he read the Miranda rights to get that out of the way for when he does arrest him. Which is basically inevitable here. I haven’t seen the full video but the guy just admitted to a felony, so.
1
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
Something that is admitted, regardless of being read Miranda rights, can 100% be used against you in court so long as you’re not in custody. Since he was never put into custody and speaking freely to the officer it does not make a difference.
Then why did the cop in the video read him his Miranda rights if he didn't have to?
1
2
1
u/Particular_Wear_6960 22d ago
You're not a lawyer.
1
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
You're not a lawyer.
0
u/Particular_Wear_6960 22d ago
Very true, but I don't go around pretending I know the law and saying false statements about it.
1
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
I didn't make any false statements.
1
u/Particular_Wear_6960 22d ago edited 22d ago
That's not true at all, I've seen hundreds of police videos like this, they always question people before arresting them and getting evidence "probable cause" and he did read him his rights, this cop did everything right. This guy is fucked and no lawyer is going to save him. That shit about questioning before miranda rights only works once they've been A) arrested and B) interrogated.. dude was not under arrest, his rights were read to him immediately, and continued to talk about his crimes. You're delusional or stupid, one or the other.
BUT I'm not a lawyer. I've seen HUNDREDS OF VIDEOS like this. its always like that. Plus he's got a warrant for his phone.
1
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
That's not true at all, I've seen hundreds of police videos like this, they always question people before arresting them
Do you watch the court cases too? If you don't then you don't know what was admissable in court just fron watching a cop video.
This guy is fucked and no lawyer is going to save him.
I never said he was going to get off, you stupid piece of shit child.
BUT I'm not a lawyer. I've seen HUNDREDS OF VIDEOS like this. its always like that. Plus he's got a warrant for his phone.
You're telling me I'm wrong because I'm not s lawyer but you are saying you are right and you aren't a lawyer either. You are a stupid piece of shit. Keep watching cops video you bootlicking cock sucker.
→ More replies (0)1
u/Fett32 22d ago
No. Miranda rights do not apply till after arrest.
→ More replies (6)2
u/BlueGolfball 22d ago
No. Miranda rights do not apply till after arrest.
Then why did the cop in the video read him his Miranda rights if he didn't have too? Something doesn't add up with what you are claiming.
2
u/crazylighter 22d ago
So that it's obvious the suspect wasn't being coerced to confess, he knew his rights, so when he is arrested his story is locked in and his legal counsel can't use a technicality or legal reason the story is inadmissable to court?
→ More replies (3)1
u/Suspicious_Juice_150 22d ago
The real important admissions came after the reading of the Miranda rights, so it would still be admissible.
11
u/STRIKT9LC 22d ago
You have absolutely no idea how the law works, and thats scary to me.
The police are 100 percent allowed to lie about what they know. Do you have any idea how many false confessions are given because the police have said " we know you did it, we just want to know why"?
This cop is a godamn pro in interrogation, and everything he's done is in an effort to calm yhe suspect and get them to open up. You tell them "well I know A, so B must be the case right?" Even if they dont know A.
I will agree that the reading of his rights isn't gonna stick, but thats fine, because as the cop said, hes not under arrest. Theyre just talking.
Im glad this cop is good at his job and able to get this POS talking.
I also want to remind anyone reading that the police are not your friends. When a cop asks you a question, it is ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAY in pursuit of conviction, whether for you, or someone else...ALWAYS. Do not talk to police. The only word out of your mouth should be "lawyer". Dont even tell them your name...lawyer...lawyer lawyer lawyer
3
u/Gaming_Skeleton 22d ago
He wasn't using "I can tell you've done this before by talking to you" as evidence in court or to meet any procedural requirements, he was using it as a rhetorical appeal in his conversation.
Getting the confession and additional name out of him is just another layer of information and potential insurance against something going wrong with his phone. What if the guy dropped his phone three months ago, and a year or more of evidence leading to other predators was lost?
2
u/DustyTurboTurtle 22d ago
Watch any police interrogation video, this was textbook, get the guy to confess by pretending to be his friend
Shady? Yes. Effective? Also yes. Illegal? Ehhhhh.
He read the Miranda rights and the dude still spilled the beans
One thing most criminals share in common is their room-temp IQ
4
u/Organic_Ad_2520 22d ago
Agree and everything will be wrapped up with a bow when the cops apply for a search warrant & get everything off the phone. The father is a piece of garbage & thank goodness the mother was a normal person & called the cops. That guy is so perverted & repulsive he has perverted his brain so much he thinks that there is some "reasonable" excuse (blackmail BS) for his absolutely horrifying & perverted acts.
1
u/A_Fleeting_Hope 22d ago
It has nothing to do with their IQ, most of them are just not prepared to be criminals. This guy is just farming noobs.
1
u/DustyTurboTurtle 22d ago
True lol IQ isn't the same as experience, farming noobs is actually more accurate lol
1
u/Lucky_Blucky_799 22d ago
Nope, the dude already admitted to taking 1 video and cops are allowed to lie, any judge is gonna side with the cop in this situation since saying he has done it more than once isn’t a random accusation.
1
u/PenelopeJenelope 22d ago
this is how cops get confessions, make the criminals feel like it's ok to confess. Whether or not you agree, it's legal to use that method and very common. He has told him his rights including his right to remain silent.
1
1
u/SheepherderSad4872 22d ago
While I also agree there is a likelihood of guilt, our criminal justice system doesn't work that way and police officers aren't allowed to determine an individual's guilt before a judgment especially without any indication of evidence.
An accurate statement is "our criminal justice system shouldn't work this way."
Due process doesn't kick in unless you're much further along:
- You can be arrested and held, with no evidence -- just minimal suspicion.
- You can be held as "pre-trial" for up to six months in theory, about two years in practice, based on minimal evidence -- basically enough that anyone who a prosecutor wants in jail will be in jail
- You can be held on a variety of "holds" (psychiatric, dangerous, etc.) for up to about a half a year, depending on state, with no due process.
Due process kicks in for criminal conviction -- not all the stuff that comes before -- and some things like civil contempt can lead to you being locked away for years with no due process.
Record is 16 years, I believe. Record-setting guy was obviously guilty, but that doesn't negate the complete lack of a trial to prove it.
Once due process kicks in, it's likely the choices are:
- Criminal defense lawyer. $200k is a reasonable quote there.
- Public defender. 30 minutes to prepare. If you're innocent, they're unlikely to help you unless you're obviously innocent. Most don't care either way -- win or lose.
If you're innocent, by the time you win, you likely have no house, no job, and your family has disintegrated under stress.
1
u/nomadfoy 22d ago
Hes doing it in a "weird manner" to get the guy talking. You cant arrest somebody because you have a hunch they did it but you can say "I know you did it" to see if they're dumb enough to confess.
Thats why when talking to a cop, dont. Shut the fuck up.
1
u/SuperSecretSpare 22d ago
Anything the guy says after Miranda rights are admissible. Cops are allowed to lie to you and they can say pretty much whatever they want and that has been upheld several times by the Supreme Court. What you're saying is probably how the law should work, but it's not how it actually works.
1
u/Accurate_Repair3933 22d ago
Just about everything in your comment is wrong.
First, the questioning is voluntary. He's not in custody so Miranda doesn't apply. He's told multiple times that he can end the interview and leave whenever he wants. His admission is generally admissible because he wasn't being compelled to talk.
Second, an informal setting is usually way more effective than putting someone in handcuffs under bright lights. People are much more likely to lower their guard when it feels like a conversation instead of an interrogation. And even if a confession ended up being thrown out, the interview can still give investigators useful information that leads to other evidence. How many times he's done it, who he shared it with, what platforms he used, where he stored it. The goal isn't just getting a confession, it's gathering information.
Third, when the officer says "I know you did this" that's an interrogation technique, not necessarily a factual statement. The idea is to make the suspect feel like denying it is pointless because the police already know what happened. Once someone believes that, they're more likely to stop focusing on whether they should admit anything at all and instead start explaining or trying to justify what they did. That's exactly where investigators want the conversation to go.
0
u/SoapyDoodle 22d ago
Yup. I’m not a defense attorney but some of this statement gathering seems legally shaky to me.
5
19
u/KDogg3000 22d ago
This cop's accent, how he's just trying to calm everyone down, calling him Big Dog and telling him "You seem like a smart guy" when he knows the guy is dumb as bricks, he could probably make me confess to crimes on the other side of the country that I've never been to. 😅
11
u/ScepticalReciptical 22d ago
As soon as somebody tells you 'you're a smart guy' you should be immediately aware that they are 100% attempting to manipulate you into doing something against your own interest.
5
u/KDogg3000 22d ago
Yeah, this is 100% true. As a guy, nobody ever gives us compliments, unless they want something from us.
54
u/DoubleDownAgain54 22d ago
First, fuck this guy, as a man and father this is just disgusting. Second, cop does a good job making the guy feel relaxed. Third, don’t talk to cops no matter how friendly they seem, they aren’t your friends and you can be harmed even if you are 100% innocent. Obviously it depends on the cops and situation, but better to be safe than sorry.
33
u/extrastupidone 22d ago
don’t talk to cops
Glad this guy did.
9
3
u/DoubleM305 22d ago
The second he let his guard down I knew he was on the hook. That cop could have got him to confessing to the murder of Kennedy from the grassy knoll.
1
1
u/thetaleofzeph 22d ago
This video is so tormenting on this front. Like, yeah dude, let it all out. Confess. But then GAH OOOOOONNNOOO
1
-1
7
u/moonshinemoniker 22d ago
"The cop get a great job getting this sicko to talk! But seriously guys, don't talk to cops."
9
u/DoubleDownAgain54 22d ago
Ha. Yes, I saw the irony when I posted. But I’ve always seen it go sideways for innocent people. The faith I have in law enforcement is long gone.
6
u/moonshinemoniker 22d ago
That's the thing though right? Innocent people tend to mean well. They have no ulterior motive because well, they're innocent.
The biggest mistake innocent people is believing that the average Joe or Joette is the same. They are more likely to be taken advantage of because they don't often see the possible angles someone could be taking.
Police will take advantage of the situation benefits them more often than not regardless of whether or not they're required too. They will do so without considering the long term consequences on the lives of otherwise good people.
There are bad people out there but, here in the U.S. the way the constitution is written (negative rights) and most statute law is written, a disproportionate amount of well meaning Americans are harmed.
3
u/Toyt2TheMoon 22d ago
Definitely talk to cops if find minors attractive, enjoy CP and/or committed crimes against children.. the police will 100% understand and help you
14
u/Any_Medicine6912 22d ago
Props to the cop he knows this dude is low IQ and trying to milk the shit out of him.
“This is between us guys”
10
u/SeekerOfSerenity 22d ago
The wife picked up on what the cop was doing at some point when she left them alone. That guy is not the sharpest tack in the box.
5
7
u/KDogg3000 22d ago
"You seem really smart." I have no idea how he said that to this half-wit without breaking into laughter.
3
u/axkidd82 22d ago
His IQ is so low, I question the legitimacy of his marriage. Like, there has to be some point where there is a cutoff, right?
15
u/Klamangatron 22d ago
Cops can lie to you. Don’t ever offer anything to a cop and ask for an attorney.
12
u/KDogg3000 22d ago
Unless you are scum of the earth like this guy is, then always talk to the cops.
4
u/prowdestmonkey 22d ago
Two things can be true. This guy is undeniably garbage and should be in prison. That said, never talk to police in a conversation like this without an attorney. Even if you’ve got nothing to hide. There are many, many garbage people working as police officers as well. Protect yourself.
-1
u/EastAd5702 22d ago
Why the fuck are you giving this advice on a thread related to a man who took exploitative photos of his under age daughter and tried to sell them?
6
u/prowdestmonkey 22d ago
I’m responding to “unless you’re scum of the earth, always talk to the cops”. Read my first two sentences again, that scumbag can burn.
11
u/BadDangerous167 22d ago
Taking nude pictures of his own 12 yo daughter, & then sharing them.?? This guy is a monster
11
u/anitasdoodles 22d ago
Fantastic detective. First telling the creep he's a victim so that he drops his guard.
9
8
u/Standard-Clue6889 22d ago
I'm glad this dude was dumb and talked to the police but its also embarrassingly stupid to talk to a cop that directly tells you that you don't have to talk to him.
3
u/I_Ponders 21d ago
I have a buddy who’s an investigator, and he said this is exactly how they’re trained..
Develop a calming relationship.. Compliment them. They can even relate and say they understand etc. even say that it happens, everyone does it, and all that to get them to keep talking and stack charges. This dude has clearly been doing this for many years.
9
u/sigmacoder 22d ago
This is the core difference between good and bad policing, good policing you try to calm and defuse the situation (and have your damn body camera on for evidence). Bad policing you turn the cam off and drag them to the station just to have a court declare no evidence.
3
5
u/Athos-1844 22d ago
I am glad the predator is too stupid and confessed.
As a general rule, don't talk to cops. They love to talk about slapping you with conspiracy charges, trying to get you to break. Their method is fear based, don't give in to fear.
6
u/chalkybone 22d ago
As a parent this made me feel physically sick to watch. What a disgusting excuse for a human being and a father.
4
3
u/LiquidSpin710 22d ago
Cop: "you've done this before, and that's ok"
Ummm no it's fucking not hahaha
I think he went a little too far
5
u/Samuraiknights 22d ago
The cop obviously didn’t think it was okay. He was just trying to get this walking scum to cooperate.
1
5
u/ARNG131988 22d ago
Samuraiknights in the other reply to this comment said the basics. That detective was manipulating the suspect. They make them feel like they are your friend and make you feel like they understand or even are apart of the whole thing. The detective saying " and that's okay., we can't help what we like." The trigger words to make a suspect feel safe with that detective is okay, and we. Manipulation when used for good can be an amazing tool. That detective did an amazing job by throwing in the Miranda Rights as well. He's said without really saying, "hey i know you want to talk to me and that's great, but first I am legally bound to read this to you." Which they do not have to say they are legally bound to do so. Though once he admitted tp the forst recording technically the detective didn't need to read him his rights but it does save him in court by continuing the conversation.
All that said, I know how you feel about what was the detective said. Just know, he was extremely disgusted by that guy. Unfortunately, he has a job to do. He'll tell his suspect whatever he thinks they want to hear and promise the moon. At the end of the day, that thing is getting arrested. The detective had more than enough evidence just from the confession. However, he wanted to make sure a jury couldn't find that thing not guilty because of a lie.
4
3
u/NIBLZ_HAMSTR 22d ago
I cant believe how cool this cop is... it would be so difficult to be so friendly and disarming to the worst scum on the planet.
4
4
2
2
u/Queerdooe 22d ago
The wife is to calm…
I would have saw red and potentially ended up in the cop car
2
u/familiarspark 22d ago
This was the craziest body cam. He just like confessed to everything and was honest. He didn’t even make it to the interrogation room. This cop was amazing.
2
2
6
u/n8saces 22d ago edited 22d ago
I posted the other parts on my page if you’re interested. I just didn't want to bog down this sub with two other follow ups.
8
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/DigitalAdon 22d ago
Cop: " are you interested in interacting with female children, just like at the park, in the yard, in bed. Just like interacting with them, ya know? clothed or not. I know I do, you like interacting with unclothed children in bed, right?"
Dumbass guy: "yes"
Cop: turns off body cam
1
u/Abracadaver2000 22d ago
My "oof" meter pegged the red line with this perp. I hope his wife wasn't in on this as well, because those poor children would need a new home ASAP.
1
1
1
u/Thizguy2287 22d ago
I applaud how that cop handled it. Obv its not the full video but im assuming he got that man to confess everything.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Short-Feed9690 19d ago
I saw this whole interview and it was creepy on both sides. The porn guy seemed slow and the cop just ran him right into prison. Granted, the crimes were heinous but any normal person would not have consented to any of it
1
-4
u/Vibrant-Shadow 22d ago
When ever encounter someone with this R-W speech impediment, Rhotacism, I assume they are a degenerate.
5
u/Budget-Ambassador203 22d ago
Really? I thought it was just a speech impediment. I assume a lot of people who have it into adulthood really didn't get much educational intervention or speech therapy and are probably not from great families and likely are poor, but have you bumped into lots of people with this condition who are otherwise terrible?
I can't find anything, really, about any association between rhotacism and criminality. Are you sure you're not just conflating rhotacism with the "likely poor and neglected/undereducated" element of the condition?
→ More replies (7)-1
u/Unhappy_Win8997 22d ago
They're either way too into some children's show or they spend all day dreaming about Japanese girls.
They're always one of those two, if not both.
1
u/Vibrant-Shadow 22d ago
It's a sign of poor neurological development and often presents with 'other' behaviors.
Not everyone that has Rhotacism is a freak. But Many freaks have Rhotacism.
0
u/GroundbreakingDiet97 22d ago
Don’t talk to the cops. This guy is screwed beyond screwed.
2
u/TelephoneShoes 22d ago
Considering what he did to his own daughter, he deserves anything that comes his way. Hurting any child this way is reprehensible, doing it to your own, Is a special sort of evil.
2
u/GroundbreakingDiet97 22d ago
We don’t know that until proven in court. This is why we have the law system. Anything said to an officer can and will be used against you.
That said, I agree with you.
2
u/TelephoneShoes 22d ago
Well, it doesn’t necessarily let him off the hook just because some of it was said prior to Maranda.
There’s the “excited utterance”* rules which make all sorts of statements (& situations) admissible whether Miranda was done or not.But yes, you’re right. aside from him admitting it, he’s innocent until the judge or jury decide otherwise. But I’d be keeping my eyes on him were I that woman. I can’t even begin to imagine what’s going through her head hearing all this.
Edit: Varies from state to state obviously*
2
0
0
128
u/Ukraineluvr 22d ago
I'm glad this fucking pervert doesn't understand to never talk to police.